Tora^3 dennishe(J) vs Khyberbill (A) DBB-C with stacking limits

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
dennishe
Posts: 1081
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:25 am
Location: Leiden, the Netherlands

RE: Fuel

Post by dennishe »

ORIGINAL: Cannonfodder

You could use it to take a location, you do not need to keep all the troops to garrison the places you take.

That is indeed what I will do. I meant that I will not try to take OZ, NZL or India or some other crazy location and end up in a battle on attrition from which there is no escape...
steverodgers801
Posts: 181
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 4:13 am

RE: Fuel

Post by steverodgers801 »

I do have a use for all those battalion , they can relieve larger units in India
User avatar
CyrusSpitama
Posts: 222
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 2:36 am
Location: Naw'lins, Luzianna

RE: Fuel

Post by CyrusSpitama »

ORIGINAL: dennishe

In the meantime I have solved my little problem with the Dutch bombers getting trough the Japanese cap too easily. [:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D] Apparently, chosing the right altitude can be very critical.


What varying lvls of CAP did you use?


I just caught up on the AAR and am enjoying the progress so far. Might I request a view of the overall map?

Banzai !
"I'm sure the universe is full of intelligent life. It's just been too intelligent to come here." - Arthur C. Clarke
User avatar
dennishe
Posts: 1081
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:25 am
Location: Leiden, the Netherlands

RE: Fuel

Post by dennishe »

This is the situation halfway Januari 1942. Little is happening at the moment. I'm waiting for minesweepers and amphibious TFs to move the units out of Singapore. In the meantime I'm also preparing an invasion of Kupang and Java, and I'm setting up the fuel convoy system.

I'm not sure which units I placed at which altitudes (too long ago), but for sure one Zero squadron was at 10000 feet and two others at 15000 and 20000. The Allies were coming in around 10000 as well.

Image
Attachments
AAR_19.jpg
AAR_19.jpg (190.26 KiB) Viewed 287 times
User avatar
dennishe
Posts: 1081
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:25 am
Location: Leiden, the Netherlands

The battle for the Philippines

Post by dennishe »

Khyberbill found out that I only moved little troops to the Philippines and that except for the main force all other hexes were poorly defended. Remarkably he was able to move from one contended hex to another (Always thought that this was impossible???). Anyways I don't think this is bad for the empire. Although this may cost me some units, I can now take on units one at a time without them being dug in behind huge fortresses. I have quite ome AV still in Manilla, which is the only opportunity for the Allies to get some supplies. Moreover the 38th division will land at Iba if this will be necessary. Otherwise they will sail on to Java. A very interesting turn of events for sure...

Image
Attachments
AAR_20.jpg
AAR_20.jpg (62.8 KiB) Viewed 287 times
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: The battle for the Philippines

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: dennishe

Khyberbill found out that I only moved little troops to the Philippines and that except for the main force all other hexes were poorly defended. Remarkably he was able to move from one contended hex to another (Always thought that this was impossible???). Anyways I don't think this is bad for the empire. Although this may cost me some units, I can now take on units one at a time without them being dug in behind huge fortresses. I have quite ome AV still in Manilla, which is the only opportunity for the Allies to get some supplies. Moreover the 38th division will land at Iba if this will be necessary. Otherwise they will sail on to Java. A very interesting turn of events for sure...

Image
You can do that as long as you own that hex side within the hex you are leaving. But retreating to a hex that contains enemy AV is forbidden.
User avatar
dennishe
Posts: 1081
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:25 am
Location: Leiden, the Netherlands

ASW warfare

Post by dennishe »

In my game with Khyberbill neither side managed to score a single ASW hit on a submarine. Something appears to be wrong. Is anybody else having this problem?
User avatar
CyrusSpitama
Posts: 222
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 2:36 am
Location: Naw'lins, Luzianna

RE: ASW warfare

Post by CyrusSpitama »

As many of us have discovered, especially as Japan, early ASW consists mostly of detection with the very rare hit. If you are training adequate squadrons in key areas, you should start seeing some hits starting around o... say Feb' 42 ?
"I'm sure the universe is full of intelligent life. It's just been too intelligent to come here." - Arthur C. Clarke
User avatar
dennishe
Posts: 1081
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:25 am
Location: Leiden, the Netherlands

RE: ASW warfare

Post by dennishe »

ORIGINAL: CyrusSpitama

As many of us have discovered, especially as Japan, early ASW consists mostly of detection with the very rare hit. If you are training adequate squadrons in key areas, you should start seeing some hits starting around o... say Feb' 42 ?

I'm not worried about the Japanese ASW not hitting anything. But Khyberbill also hasn't scored a single hit. Not even a dent in any of my subs...
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: ASW warfare

Post by witpqs »

I'm in a Babes 28-C game started Dec 2011, game now just hitting Oct 1942. No such problems.
JocMeister
Posts: 8258
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:03 am
Location: Sweden

RE: ASW warfare

Post by JocMeister »

In my DBB-L game 5 Japanese and 5 Allied subs have been sunk by DCs in 10/42.
Image
User avatar
offenseman
Posts: 768
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 11:05 pm
Location: Sheridan Wyoming, USA

RE: ASW warfare

Post by offenseman »

Enjoying this so far! Subscribed and looking forward to more.

Very aggressive move toward Palembang so early. It was very nice of him to give you that gift. :) Singers as well.
Sometimes things said in Nitwit sound very different in English.
User avatar
dennishe
Posts: 1081
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:25 am
Location: Leiden, the Netherlands

RE: ASW warfare

Post by dennishe »

Finally, one of my ASW ships managed to score depth charge hits on an enemy submarine near Kupang. Kupang fell after a Japanese invasion and except for Java, most of the Dutch east Indies are in Japanese hands, while it is not even February yet. Japanese troops are also marching into Burma, where the Allies have also retreated. I didn't want to take Magwe yet because I first want to put up a fighter cap. Yet since it was abandoned, Magwe turned and I quickly had to put up a long range cap from Thailand. Fortunately, the Allies are not bombarding yet. I'm not going to repair anything in Magwe, but I do want to get as much oil out as possible.

Image
Attachments
AAR_22.jpg
AAR_22.jpg (215.63 KiB) Viewed 287 times
User avatar
dennishe
Posts: 1081
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:25 am
Location: Leiden, the Netherlands

RE: ASW warfare

Post by dennishe »

Khyberbill is reinforcing the atolls south of Java. Good. This will be their death trap then. After the capture of Java I will have major ports (to rearm bombardement TFs) and sufficient airfields for my bombers. The Allied troops on the Island will die or become POWs.



Image
Attachments
AAR_23.jpg
AAR_23.jpg (48.38 KiB) Viewed 287 times
User avatar
dennishe
Posts: 1081
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:25 am
Location: Leiden, the Netherlands

RE: ASW warfare

Post by dennishe »

February 2nd 1942: Khyberbill has gone on the offensive at Luzon, but since the 38th division landed things are going bad for him fast. The 14th Army took control over Clark Field and the 38th division captured all USAFFE HQs at Subic Bay. A few units are isolated in the Philippinian jungle, while all others are stuck at Bataan.


Image
Attachments
AAR_24.jpg
AAR_24.jpg (73.63 KiB) Viewed 287 times
User avatar
dennishe
Posts: 1081
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:25 am
Location: Leiden, the Netherlands

The battle of Java

Post by dennishe »

The Imperial Japanese Army is landing troops all along the northern coastline of Java. There appear to be short range auxiliary vessels and obsolete Dutch bombers present on the islands. The Dutch units have gathered at the southern coastline of Java. I think I have landed already quite some troops (half of the 25th Army; while the rest is at Sumatra and landed at Port Blair). Tomorrow also units of the 1st and 2nd raiding force will land at the eastern tip of Java. Besides Java and Port Blair, Japanese units also landed at and captured Baker Island.

Image
Attachments
AAR_25.jpg
AAR_25.jpg (66.09 KiB) Viewed 287 times
User avatar
dennishe
Posts: 1081
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:25 am
Location: Leiden, the Netherlands

RE: The battle of Java

Post by dennishe »

Earlier I mentioned that I'm organizing my economy to fight in '44 and '45 and that I'm saving as much HI as possible. Besides HI, engines are also money in the back and starting from the beginning of February I'm ramping up engine production. (December '41 and January were used to ramp up vehicles)


Image
Attachments
AAR_26.jpg
AAR_26.jpg (83.57 KiB) Viewed 288 times
User avatar
dennishe
Posts: 1081
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:25 am
Location: Leiden, the Netherlands

Strategy

Post by dennishe »

I expect Burma to be a major battlefield in this war. I do not intend to move into India, as this would cost a lot of resources and in case of a defeat may result in a Stalingrad-like isolation of an entire army behind enemy lines. Instead Burma is an ideal place to defend. Especially with the new stacking limits. Supplies will be a major factor in this war. The Japanese bombers will play an important role in the battle as they will bombard British (and Dutch, Australian, Chinese and American) units marching trough the jungle. The bombers will operate from lvl 4 bases that are directly connected to a railroad line to Bangkok or Saigon. Hence these bases can easily be supplied. Also the locations of these bases that I picked are very difficult to take by the Allies. Also they will be outside Allied fighter range for quite some time. Only some fighter groups will be stationed in Burma itself.

Image
Attachments
AAR_27.jpg
AAR_27.jpg (366.97 KiB) Viewed 287 times
User avatar
rook749
Posts: 1175
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 3:41 am

RE: Strategy

Post by rook749 »

ORIGINAL: dennishe

I expect Burma to be a major battlefield in this war. I do not intend to move into China, as this would cost a lot of resources and in case of a defeat may result in a Stalingrad-like isolation of an entire army behind enemy lines. Instead Burma is an ideal place to defend. Especially with the new stacking limits. Supplies will be a major factor in this war. The Japanese bombers will play an important role in the battle as they will bombard British (and Dutch, Australian, Chinese and American) units marching trough the jungle. The bombers will operate from lvl 4 bases that are directly connected to a railroad line to Bangkok or Saigon. Hence these bases can easily be supplied. Also the locations of these bases that I picked are very difficult to take by the Allies. Also they will be outside Allied fighter range for quite some time. Only some fighter groups will be stationed in Burma itself.

Image

That is a well thought defensive plan, one I hope my opponent does not see :).

Rook749
User avatar
offenseman
Posts: 768
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 11:05 pm
Location: Sheridan Wyoming, USA

RE: Strategy

Post by offenseman »

I like the concept but it might be interesting if you found a way to take Kunming as a very hard to take place that is in range of Ledo. The Allies can use massive amounts of air from Ledo to supply China and thus always keep your flank troublesome.
Sometimes things said in Nitwit sound very different in English.
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”