Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3741
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock

Post by Captain Cruft »

This looks like the AI to me, not a human ...
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock

Post by Lowpe »

Ok, I gotta work on my turn a little.

Some other salient points...

The allied 4Es are intact and whole, and pre beta coordinate attacks very nicely.

The KB is in Singapore, with about the entire Japanese fleet and there is no, as in zero, fuel there. Oddly, there are some tankers scattered singly in ports all over the place.

There are no capital ships in the home islands, truk, central pacific, north pacific, really, anywhere, but Singapore and off Java. And I am including Destroyers in my loose interpretation of capital ship here. Most subs are between Baker and Hawaii with full torpedo loads.

Sapporo HI shut down due to lack of fuel. I shut off the Merchant shipyards and stopped a lot of xakls. Miri is still heavily damaged and has only 6k supply. There still seem to be enemy minefields at Balikpapen.

There is no ASW effort. Well, maybe one squadron of Petes somewhere.

I am woefully short of AKEs, AS, ARs, ACMS, AVs and I am bleeding losses from low garrisons all over the place.

I will put up shots of the theaters later but there isn't much to see. It is quite distressing and I have reached my limit for now.

My rough plan: Economy, Rest and Reorganize. I think my opponent will be very aggressive in Java so I will try to ultimately use that against him...and I need to understand unrealistic R&D.

The few political points I have will be used in changing leaders...I have some real winners in some of the fighter squadrons. 25 air...jeesh.














Spidery
Posts: 1821
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 5:47 am
Location: Hampshire, UK

RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock

Post by Spidery »

Looks like you could do with more Vehicle production and you may as well provide it by converting Armament factories as you have an impressive stockpile of armaments. Something like converting 100 factories (if supply is available).

What is the supply situation like?

Is engine production okay or has he over expanded the R&D factories?

User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock

Post by Lowpe »

The Java Front.

Image
Attachments
Java.jpg
Java.jpg (154.78 KiB) Viewed 460 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL:
Is engine production okay or has he over expanded the R&D factories?

Here is the engine production for 31-35. Less than 10 in pool for all but the 31. I will put some tracker posts up later...



Image
Attachments
engines.jpg
engines.jpg (34.03 KiB) Viewed 460 times
User avatar
CaptBeefheart
Posts: 2617
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2003 2:42 am
Location: Seoul, Korea

RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock

Post by CaptBeefheart »

Holy Sisyphean task, Batman! Good luck!

Cheers,
CC
Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: Captain Cruft

This looks like the AI to me, not a human ...

No, definitely a person. My mind rebels at all the fragments, the utter chaos, that resulted from looking for a big win and ignoring everything else.



User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock

Post by Lowpe »

Major Capital ships lost, doesn't look too bad, but the IJN has lost lots of ships. British Carrier losses might provide some opportunities.



Image
Attachments
capitalshiplosss.jpg
capitalshiplosss.jpg (64.61 KiB) Viewed 463 times
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock

Post by obvert »

Well, this should be fun to put back together. No pressure at least. If you can get what you need in the DEI and get production, oil/fuel shipments and other logistical details back in order, you should be alright.

Good luck!
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3741
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock

Post by Captain Cruft »

I took over a game back in the WitP days. It was nothing like as messy as this but it was still a lot of fun sorting things out.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock

Post by Lowpe »

Engine R and D.

Image
Attachments
enginerandd.jpg
enginerandd.jpg (58.51 KiB) Viewed 465 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock

Post by Lowpe »

Resources, Supplies, etc.

Image
Attachments
supplystockpiles.jpg
supplystockpiles.jpg (131.24 KiB) Viewed 465 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock

Post by Lowpe »

Total ship losses.

Image
Attachments
Moreshiplosses.jpg
Moreshiplosses.jpg (54.22 KiB) Viewed 467 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock

Post by Lowpe »

The Chart.

Image
Attachments
industrychart.jpg
industrychart.jpg (99.84 KiB) Viewed 467 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock

Post by Lowpe »

Here are some monster air units. I doubt they could have fit on the cvls....

Image
Attachments
Largeairunits.jpg
Largeairunits.jpg (83.78 KiB) Viewed 465 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock

Post by Lowpe »

Planes losses courtesy of tracker.

Image
Attachments
trackerplanelosses.jpg
trackerplanelosses.jpg (111.38 KiB) Viewed 466 times
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3741
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock

Post by Captain Cruft »

He did some "Akagi resize" tricks ...
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: Captain Cruft

He did some "Akagi resize" tricks ...

I will be returning them to the pools...nothing quite like 100 obsolete planes on the front lines using up air capacity, supplies and support.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock

Post by Lowpe »

On ship losses, further examination shows about 100 of my losses have come courtesy of the 1000 bomb and another 20 or so with the 500 pounder. All over the place including the DEI and IO.

10-15 mine losses...hit the destroyers hard.

User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9304
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock

Post by Lokasenna »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

ORIGINAL: Captain Cruft

He did some "Akagi resize" tricks ...

I will be returning them to the pools...nothing quite like 100 obsolete planes on the front lines using up air capacity, supplies and support.

Why not keep them around as training groups?
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”