stretegic warfare subs and air?

World in Flames is the computer version of Australian Design Group classic board game. World In Flames is a highly detailed game covering the both Europe and Pacific Theaters of Operations during World War II. If you want grand strategy this game is for you.

Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets

User avatar
AxelNL
Posts: 2389
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2011 12:43 pm
Location: The Netherlands

RE: stretegic warfare subs and air?

Post by AxelNL »

ORIGINAL: Omnius

AxelNL,
Thanks for allaying my fears to having just upgraded to the public beta 1.215.

Omnius

My pleasure[8D]
Ur_Vile_WEdge
Posts: 585
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:10 pm

RE: stretegic warfare subs and air?

Post by Ur_Vile_WEdge »

One of the things that (tiny tiny drop of resentment in a great sea of awesome) irks me in WiF in general is that the battle of the Atlantic is a bit too easy for the Allies. IRL, the Brits and their associated dependents lost about 14 millionish tonnes of shipping. That's around 80 convoy points, if you go for the 6 CP= 1 million tons.

I don't think I've ever seen a game where the British lost 80 convoys. Not even close. Too easy to stuff the 0 boxes with airplanes, put a cruiser in the 4, and suddenly it's really hard to get the sub thing going.


And the strategic bombing campaign. I recently saw a breakdown of the Luftwaffe losses, and I hadn't realized just how many of their planes were being shot down over Germany itself to try to parry the strat bombers. It was an astoundingly high figure, and that's again something I don't see too much of in WiF.
"When beset by danger,
When in deadly doubt,
Run in little circles,
Wave your arms and shout."
User avatar
yvesp
Posts: 2083
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 3:10 pm

RE: stretegic warfare subs and air?

Post by yvesp »

ORIGINAL: Ur_Vile_WEdge

One of the things that (tiny tiny drop of resentment in a great sea of awesome) irks me in WiF in general is that the battle of the Atlantic is a bit too easy for the Allies. IRL, the Brits and their associated dependents lost about 14 millionish tonnes of shipping. That's around 80 convoy points, if you go for the 6 CP= 1 million tons.

I don't think I've ever seen a game where the British lost 80 convoys. Not even close. Too easy to stuff the 0 boxes with airplanes, put a cruiser in the 4, and suddenly it's really hard to get the sub thing going.


And the strategic bombing campaign. I recently saw a breakdown of the Luftwaffe losses, and I hadn't realized just how many of their planes were being shot down over Germany itself to try to parry the strat bombers. It was an astoundingly high figure, and that's again something I don't see too much of in WiF.

Yes, but historically the allies were pretty bad with merchant shipping during the first years of the war.
So comparing the naval war in the atlantic to history is akin to comparing the Russian campaign with history : why do German corps retreat in better positions when, historically, Hitler would stick them in place to be more easily destroyed ?
User avatar
micheljq
Posts: 791
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 3:03 pm
Location: Quebec
Contact:

RE: stretegic warfare subs and air?

Post by micheljq »

By april 1944 the war in the air was won by the allies (cost was heavy on allies side too) in the sense that Luftwaffe was no longer a threat.

This allowed the allies to have practically total air superiority for D-Day in june.

The sub war in Atlantic I see it that way. It will push pressure on the Commonwealth to protect the convoys in a lot of sea zones. Commonwealth has almost to do a naval action in the first impulse of each turn to protect the convoys. Protection of the convoys cost oil each turn to Commonwealth (when you play with oil) and later USA. By 1941-42, it is putting pressure on Commonwealth's economy, later with U.S. lend lease this will be easier.

Michel.


Michel Desjardins,
"Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious" - Oscar Wilde
"History is a set of lies agreed upon" - Napoleon Bonaparte after the battle of Waterloo, june 18th, 1815
Post Reply

Return to “World in Flames”