The Soviets had no problems railing troops around during 1941 ... So denying the Soviets of any rail capacity at all would fly in the face of history.
Were they railing troops to some defensive positions further to the east, or were they railing troops to the west to counterattack ? [Rhetorical]. So by having no rail cap and newly raised formations arriving in the western districts, I would think the scenario would be flying with history.
... denying replacements would not be proper since these people had already joined the cause. If anything they should receive MORE replacements for holding on to cities.
Say for example, new 13th Army divisions arrive at Minsk on turn x, so if the Axis occupy the arrival hex before turn x then those divisions don't arrive.
Some of these guys shouldn't even have a proficiency of 20.
Especially if they are running 400 miles to the rear ! Well, we are starting them at 40%, and the mobile units are nuetered. We'll have to see how that works out when two players have a go at it.
Perhaps give the Soviet maximum lines of retreat ...
I had thoughts in the past about using exclusion zones for this, but it seems a bit contrived. I mean, if we go that far, why not start the scenario in December 1941 so the players don't have to put up with the mundane opening of the campaign ?
Also do away with the gamey German tactic of running ant units all over the map to cut off the Soviets.
We are making a valiant effort in this regard, but its difficult.

















