Rodina Struggle (Morvael vs Cpt Flam)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21

User avatar
M60A3TTS
Posts: 4784
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 1:20 am

RE: Turn 47 or May 7, 1942

Post by M60A3TTS »

Zakharov is worthy of a guards army. Klykov is third rate and should be replaced.
User avatar
morvael
Posts: 11763
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Poland

RE: Turn 47 or May 7, 1942

Post by morvael »

ORIGINAL: chaos45

either way thats a massive pocket you will most likely secure this turn......

Well, it's May so the weather may be my friend or enemy. It all depends where the mud will appear.
chaos45
Posts: 2015
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2001 10:00 am

RE: Turn 47 or May 7, 1942

Post by chaos45 »

even with mud---it doesnt look like he got more than a tank BDE in the way---some bombing followed by a ground attack should get the hex and just save one unit to step in...because good luck the soviets moving Germans in the mud lol
User avatar
morvael
Posts: 11763
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Poland

RE: Turn 47 or May 7, 1942

Post by morvael »

But I'm afraid to be involved in a contest like the battle near the Sea of Azov in October 1941, where my isolated SS troops fought with isolated Soviet troops for weeks. That left them totally exhausted, despite air supply.
User avatar
Icier
Posts: 564
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 1:23 pm
Location: a sunny beach nsw

RE: Turn 47 or May 7, 1942

Post by Icier »

How is your armor?
I found under the new amendments, that my armor suffered losses greater than before.
Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
User avatar
morvael
Posts: 11763
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Poland

RE: Turn 47 or May 7, 1942

Post by morvael »

Armor is fine, but I have trouble replacing motorized infantry. My motorized infantry divisions operate at 30-45% TOE, while panzers at 45-60% TOE. This is of course mostly due to them being sent far away from railhead turn after turn (penetrating enemy lines), where they have trouble replacing losses. Infantry is at 55-65%.
User avatar
morvael
Posts: 11763
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Poland

RE: Turn 47 or May 7, 1942

Post by morvael »

Panzer report

Image
Attachments
panzers.jpg
panzers.jpg (297.69 KiB) Viewed 343 times
User avatar
STEF78
Posts: 2088
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 3:22 pm
Location: Versailles, France

RE: Turn 47 or May 7, 1942

Post by STEF78 »

Ouch, such big Pocket early may 1942 isn't a good news for the russians!

Summer will be very long....
GHC 9-0-3
SHC 10-0-4
User avatar
morvael
Posts: 11763
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Poland

RE: Turn 47 or May 7, 1942

Post by morvael »

It's way too short [:(]
User avatar
Icier
Posts: 564
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 1:23 pm
Location: a sunny beach nsw

RE: Turn 47 or May 7, 1942

Post by Icier »

ORIGINAL: morvael

Armor is fine, but I have trouble replacing motorized infantry. My motorized infantry divisions operate at 30-45% TOE, while panzers at 45-60% TOE. This is of course mostly due to them being sent far away from railhead turn after turn (penetrating enemy lines), where they have trouble replacing losses. Infantry is at 55-65%.
I had similar figures & found it took over 2 months plus to get my motorized up 70% TOE & I had them
sitting in Prussia....mind you it doesnt help that there are TOE upgrades during this period.
Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
User avatar
morvael
Posts: 11763
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Poland

RE: Turn 47 or May 7, 1942

Post by morvael »

It's just showing there is a global shortage of manpower. The system doesn't allow to prioritise some formations so much, that the rest will be starved. So my divs have to make do with what is on hand. Some got two weeks off the line, but I lacked spare divisions, so some are fighting without breaks since June 41 [:)]
chaos45
Posts: 2015
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2001 10:00 am

RE: Turn 47 or May 7, 1942

Post by chaos45 »

The best way to prioritize manpower is setting your unit ToE levels and disband un-needed units that soak up manpower and equipment.
User avatar
Icier
Posts: 564
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 1:23 pm
Location: a sunny beach nsw

RE: Turn 47 or May 7, 1942

Post by Icier »

Disband anti aircraft units.....also check out the German cities ...if the Russians get that far the city's ack-ack wont make any difference.
Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
User avatar
cpt flam
Posts: 2353
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 4:34 am
Location: caen - France

Turn 48 or May 14, 1942

Post by cpt flam »

Andrei Grechko (61 Army) is promoted Général-Leitenant
despite mud pocket is closed with no possibility to reopen[:(]

Image
Attachments
screenshot.1.jpg
screenshot.1.jpg (2.31 MiB) Viewed 346 times
User avatar
cpt flam
Posts: 2353
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 4:34 am
Location: caen - France

RE: Turn 48 or May 14, 1942

Post by cpt flam »

and to make things worst
two panzer corps break havoc in Crimea
few losses
1 150 for 4 030 men
30 vs 110 Art

Image
Attachments
screenshot.2.jpg
screenshot.2.jpg (1.58 MiB) Viewed 345 times
Aditia
Posts: 573
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 9:06 pm

RE: Turn 48 or May 14, 1942

Post by Aditia »

Holy cow, that is more than a million men in that pocket?
chaos45
Posts: 2015
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2001 10:00 am

RE: Turn 48 or May 14, 1942

Post by chaos45 »

Ya that pocket will hurt...the only good news is, it will take him 2-3 turns to wipe it out.
User avatar
morvael
Posts: 11763
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Poland

RE: Turn 48 or May 14, 1942

Post by morvael »

The saga of the Orel pocket begins. It will hold out for many weeks, and will require redirecting two panzer corps to assist the infantry, because without that help they would spend whole summer mopping up. And the number of tied infantry is huge.

As for the Crimea I thought it went very bad, at the last minute I had to send one panzer corps away to help 4.PzA with the souther pincer near Orel, and I found it hard to break level 3 forts in the Crimea with just one infantry and two panzer corps.
User avatar
morvael
Posts: 11763
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Poland

RE: Turn 31 or January 15, 1942

Post by morvael »

ORIGINAL: Shermanny

You are going to be scarily vulnerable come March 1942. The bulges on either flank of Moscow both invite encirclement. The face of his salient at Moscow might be thinly held, and in that case, he can attack out of the face and create a situation where your lines get thinner and thinner on both flanks.

Long, thin lines and exposed salients are opportunities for the highly mobile Germans.

If you were to pull back in a timely fashion, especially in the North where there is nothing that much needs to be defended anyhow, you could give some depth and mass to your defenses elsewhere.


I was afraid cpt flam would heed the advice of Shermanny, who was spot on [:)]
User avatar
Icier
Posts: 564
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 1:23 pm
Location: a sunny beach nsw

RE: Turn 31 or January 15, 1942

Post by Icier »

I would be interested in the German strength...if what I think are your numbers, it will be a limited
offensive.
Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”