New Scenario for Testing...3 No Trump-2019

Post new mods and scenarios here.

Moderator: MOD_Command

Kitchens Sink
Posts: 402
Joined: Sun May 04, 2014 8:55 pm

RE: New Scenario for Testing...3 No Trump-2019

Post by Kitchens Sink »

For those that are interested, I have v2 of this scenario almost ready. I am waiting on the next CMANO Build Release to finalize it, as there are a lot of fixes in that Build that will help. I have made over 10 notebook-pages of changes (front and back, small print [X(]). Thanks to those that provided input, the majority of it was implemented.

The Scenario will be much harder now. You will have more toys to play with, but so will China. Also your adversary has more refined coordination of their defense and offense, and their stealthy assets now work much better.

Stay tuned [:D]
lamboman43
Posts: 97
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 10:38 pm

RE: New Scenario for Testing...3 No Trump-2019

Post by lamboman43 »

Do we have any idea when that build will release? I haven't stayed up to date on much recently.
magi
Posts: 1533
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 1:06 am

RE: New Scenario for Testing...3 No Trump-2019

Post by magi »

cool....
AndrewJ
Posts: 2450
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 12:47 pm

RE: New Scenario for Testing...3 No Trump-2019

Post by AndrewJ »

Looking forward to this!
User avatar
wild_Willie2
Posts: 2934
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Arnhem (holland) yes a bridge to far...

RE: New Scenario for Testing...3 No Trump-2019

Post by wild_Willie2 »

Lets see how this goes under the new beta :)
In vinum illic est sapientia , in matera illic est vires , in aqua illic es bacteria.

In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there are bacteria.
Kitchens Sink
Posts: 402
Joined: Sun May 04, 2014 8:55 pm

RE: New Scenario for Testing...3 No Trump-2019

Post by Kitchens Sink »

Willie, I will probably be updating this over the coming weekend as soon as the SR7 issues I'm reading about are worked out. In the meantime I wouldn't bother with the existing scenario version...the new one I have almost ready is a whole new ball game.
Raptorx7_slith
Posts: 801
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 10:14 pm

RE: New Scenario for Testing...3 No Trump-2019

Post by Raptorx7_slith »

ORIGINAL: Kitchens Sink

Willie, I will probably be updating this over the coming weekend as soon as the SR7 issues I'm reading about are worked out. In the meantime I wouldn't bother with the existing scenario version...the new one I have almost ready is a whole new ball game.

I can't wait! [:D]
User avatar
wild_Willie2
Posts: 2934
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Arnhem (holland) yes a bridge to far...

RE: New Scenario for Testing...3 No Trump-2019

Post by wild_Willie2 »

I just played through the first 24 hours of this scenario and it is way to easy now.... I suppressed the Chinese Af's with my SSM and destroyed their fleet and 70 enemy AC with only 20 losses myself..
It is way to easy to suppress Mei-Xiang AF an thus take out a large part of enemy combat power.

Lets see how good the next version is ;)

Good job on this scenario anyway.

W.


SIDE: China
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
1x Building (Control Tower)
5x H-6K Badger [God of War]
9x J-11D Flanker B [Su-27SK Copy]
8x J-16 Flying Shark [Su-27UBK Copy]
20x Su-35K Flanker E
14x J-20 Mighty Dragon
4x Su-35S Flanker E
6x Y-9 Cub [High New 9, KJ-500 Rotodome]
4x Y-9G Cub [High New 11]
5x J-10C Vigorous Dragon
2x Z-18YJ Super Frelon [Black Bat]
1x Type 093B Shang
6x Z-9D Dauphin 2
3x Type 072 Yukan [Tow 25]
6x J-31
4x HQ-16B TEL
1x Vehicle (HQ-16A FCR)
20x DF-16B [Penetrator] TEL
1x Radar (Big Bird D [91N6])
1x CSA-004 [Diamond DA42 Twin Star]
1x A/C Hangar (2x Large Aircraft)
1x Type 056A Jiangdao [593 Sanmenxia]
2x Type 055 Zheng He
1x Type 053H3 Jiangwei II [564 Yichang]
2x Type 901 [AOE]
3x JH-7B Flounder
1x Type 051B Luhai [167 Shenzhen]
1x Type 054A Jiangkai II [530 Xuzhou]
1x Type xxx MLP [868 Donghaidao]


SIDE: Far East Alliance
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
2x RQ-180 UAV
1x Radar (J/FPS-3 BMD Mod)
7x F-2B FS-X
1x F-35A Lightning II
1x P-3C Orion Update III
9x F-CK-1D Hsiung Ying [Ching Kuo MLU]
2x F-35A Lightning II
1x 793 Hai Lung [Zwaardvis Mod Class]
2x SH-2F Seasprite
In vinum illic est sapientia , in matera illic est vires , in aqua illic es bacteria.

In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there are bacteria.
User avatar
Dysta
Posts: 1909
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2015 9:32 pm

RE: New Scenario for Testing...3 No Trump-2019

Post by Dysta »

Even for AI, this is way beyond any kind of mistakes, strategically and tactically. I will see the pre-planned missions soon.
Kitchens Sink
Posts: 402
Joined: Sun May 04, 2014 8:55 pm

RE: New Scenario for Testing...3 No Trump-2019

Post by Kitchens Sink »

New version 2.1 attached to Original Post. Should be a challenge. If you played this before or not, read the scenario description and briefing carefully, lots has changed.

If Wild_Willie reports back that he played this version and destroyed all of China while losing 2 planes, I will retire from writing scenarios forever [;)]

Have Fun!
Raptorx7_slith
Posts: 801
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 10:14 pm

RE: New Scenario for Testing...3 No Trump-2019

Post by Raptorx7_slith »

TF Atago's improved Kongos have 29 empty VLS where Hyunmoo missiles should be.

Other than that I'm enjoying this quite a bit, especially the Trump tweets [:D]
Kitchens Sink
Posts: 402
Joined: Sun May 04, 2014 8:55 pm

RE: New Scenario for Testing...3 No Trump-2019

Post by Kitchens Sink »

Yes, there are two other Japanese ships that are the same. I emptied them of the Hyunmoo missiles on purpose. The only ones you have are on TF Sejong. I'll delete the TF Atago Hyunmoo magazines on the final version.
Raptorx7_slith
Posts: 801
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 10:14 pm

RE: New Scenario for Testing...3 No Trump-2019

Post by Raptorx7_slith »

ORIGINAL: Kitchens Sink

Yes, there are two other Japanese ships that are the same. I emptied them of the Hyunmoo missiles on purpose. The only ones you have are on TF Sejong. I'll delete the TF Atago Hyunmoo magazines on the final version.

Ah ok, what confused me was that they showed up in the WRA menu and not the magazines menu.
Kitchens Sink
Posts: 402
Joined: Sun May 04, 2014 8:55 pm

RE: New Scenario for Testing...3 No Trump-2019

Post by Kitchens Sink »

I'm going to be making some final tweaks/changes to this one over the coming weekend and will put it in the Community Scenario Pack folder on the forum.

If anyone has any comments or suggestions, let me know.

Thanks!
Excroat3
Posts: 436
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2015 12:36 am

RE: New Scenario for Testing...3 No Trump-2019

Post by Excroat3 »

ORIGINAL: Kitchens Sink

I'm going to be making some final tweaks/changes to this one over the coming weekend and will put it in the Community Scenario Pack folder on the forum.

If anyone has any comments or suggestions, let me know.

Thanks!
Is the latest version of the scenario in SR7? If so, you might want to wait until SR7 releases officially before submitting it to the scenario pack. I, for one, want to play this scenario but I haven't downloaded the SR7 beta, and I'm sure there are others.
Kitchens Sink
Posts: 402
Joined: Sun May 04, 2014 8:55 pm

RE: New Scenario for Testing...3 No Trump-2019

Post by Kitchens Sink »

Fair enough, I'll wait for awhile after SR7 Public version is released before adding to Community Pack. Yes, the current version is SR7 Build 906.20, but the Public version will have the lasers re-activated so the player action will change.

I'm in no hurry, I'll just move on to my next Global debacle scenario.
Kitchens Sink
Posts: 402
Joined: Sun May 04, 2014 8:55 pm

RE: New Scenario for Testing...3 No Trump-2019

Post by Kitchens Sink »

Now that lasers are active in the final SR7 Build, I can see that I have been way to aggressive in deploying LaWS systems onto CIWS units for the blue side, making blue-side facilities and airbases pretty close to invulnerable. I will need to take some of them out and re-think this issue in the final version.
lamboman43
Posts: 97
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 10:38 pm

RE: New Scenario for Testing...3 No Trump-2019

Post by lamboman43 »

There were lasers at the bases?! I didn't even notice that. It'll be interesting to see how they work out with missile defense when you update it.
Kitchens Sink
Posts: 402
Joined: Sun May 04, 2014 8:55 pm

RE: New Scenario for Testing...3 No Trump-2019

Post by Kitchens Sink »

Yeah, basically all of the Antelope and Centurion CIWS had a LaWS system added on. Some bases had up to 3 of these systems, and some were guarding radar installations and protecting certain missile units as well. Once they were activated in the latest Build...it was clearly WAY too much. Blue side could have fought off the combined cruise missile and air forces of the entire planet [X(]

I'm working on making things reasonable again.
Post Reply

Return to “Mods and Scenarios”