Kane and Unable ;] - Game over 1945.

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Mike McCreery
Posts: 4362
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2013 2:58 pm

RE: Kane and Unable ;]

Post by Mike McCreery »

The pacific has not changed much. Just dropped off a bunch of naval support to Tabituea and began heavy bombing operations.



Image
Attachments
pacific.jpg
pacific.jpg (364.66 KiB) Viewed 220 times
Image
User avatar
Mike McCreery
Posts: 4362
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2013 2:58 pm

RE: Kane and Unable ;]

Post by Mike McCreery »

Score

Image
Attachments
score.jpg
score.jpg (457.13 KiB) Viewed 220 times
Image
User avatar
Mike McCreery
Posts: 4362
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2013 2:58 pm

RE: Kane and Unable ;]

Post by Mike McCreery »

Japanese Ships Sunk - Lots of ships have disappeared off this list unfortunately. Particularly the smaller carriers that I hit earlier. As you can see MrKane retains most of his naval capabilities.

Image
Attachments
japshipssunk.jpg
japshipssunk.jpg (96.73 KiB) Viewed 220 times
Image
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 11130
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Kane and Unable ;]

Post by PaxMondo »

Think you are doing very well against a capable opponent.
Pax
User avatar
Mike McCreery
Posts: 4362
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2013 2:58 pm

RE: Kane and Unable ;]

Post by Mike McCreery »

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo

Think you are doing very well against a capable opponent.

Thank you, your opinion is one I respect on this forum.
Image
User avatar
CaptBeefheart
Posts: 2623
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2003 2:42 am
Location: Seoul, Korea

RE: Kane and Unable ;]

Post by CaptBeefheart »

Thanks for this very entertaining AAR. I would agree you are doing a great job. His industry is going to be in trouble now that you've taken or blocked most of the oil.

To be fair to Mr. Kane, though, he's done pretty well in the air. Having parity in air loss points at this stage is pretty good for the Imperial player. Also, his VP position in general is pretty good.

Regarding his Oz mission, I skimmed over that part of the AAR so I'm not too clear. I recall one comment mentioning you were not prepared for an invasion like that, so was his withdrawal more in line with respecting your point of view or because he saw increasing risk in hanging around coupled with diminishing returns?

Cheers,
CC
Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.
User avatar
Mike McCreery
Posts: 4362
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2013 2:58 pm

RE: Kane and Unable ;]

Post by Mike McCreery »

ORIGINAL: Commander Cody

Thanks for this very entertaining AAR. I would agree you are doing a great job. His industry is going to be in trouble now that you've taken or blocked most of the oil.

To be fair to Mr. Kane, though, he's done pretty well in the air. Having parity in air loss points at this stage is pretty good for the Imperial player. Also, his VP position in general is pretty good.

Regarding his Oz mission, I skimmed over that part of the AAR so I'm not too clear. I recall one comment mentioning you were not prepared for an invasion like that, so was his withdrawal more in line with respecting your point of view or because he saw increasing risk in hanging around coupled with diminishing returns?

Cheers,
CC

He quit moving on OZ because we agreed that he would stop moving on Sydney/Melborne and wiping out the Australian troops. I probably would have quit the game if he conquered Australia.

As a counter I agreed no 4EB attacks below 10,000' which had not been discussed before that.

He won auto-victory anyway so the point is really moot.

We had agreed from the beginning that AV was not going to end the game so I was not prepared for him waging war like it was a factor.
Image
User avatar
Mike McCreery
Posts: 4362
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2013 2:58 pm

RE: Kane and Unable ;]

Post by Mike McCreery »

I smashed the HI at Soerbaja a few turns ago. Took it down to 2/39. Low and behold today I am looking and it is at 4/37. If it was you, would you tell your opponent about his supply leak?



Image
Attachments
soerbaja.jpg
soerbaja.jpg (187.98 KiB) Viewed 220 times
Image
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Kane and Unable ;]

Post by Lowpe »

So, that is Heavy Industry...it probably means there is a lot of supply there, and Japan wants to use up the supply and fuel before you get your hands on it.

Looking at the map, it is unlikely he can ship anything out of Java.

User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20697
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Kane and Unable ;]

Post by BBfanboy »

Any chance there is some FOW in the HI numbers between the two recons?
Lowpe may be right, but, unless he is withdrawing troops anyway, using up supply will reduce his troops ability to hold Java as long as possible.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 11130
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Kane and Unable ;]

Post by PaxMondo »

ORIGINAL: Wargmr

I smashed the HI at Soerbaja a few turns ago. Took it down to 2/39. Low and behold today I am looking and it is at 4/37. If it was you, would you tell your opponent about his supply leak?
It could easily be an oops on his part, but truthfully it is one of the things you need to watch carefully as IJ ... I would not break opsec on your part to tell him ... it isn't that big of a deal.
Pax
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Kane and Unable ;]

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Any chance there is some FOW in the HI numbers between the two recons?
Lowpe may be right, but, unless he is withdrawing troops anyway, using up supply will reduce his troops ability to hold Java as long as possible.

Once you can't ship fuel and oil out of Java, it is merely a pow camp...

FOW though is another good idea, the Allied recon always inflates it by at least 1 point...and if DL isn't that great...
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 11130
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Kane and Unable ;]

Post by PaxMondo »

9/13 detection ... i'd think very little FOW ...
Pax
User avatar
Mike McCreery
Posts: 4362
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2013 2:58 pm

RE: Kane and Unable ;]

Post by Mike McCreery »

It paused for a few turns but went up again last turn. Now HI is up to 7 at Soerbaja. Not enough to indicate constant repair. It could also indicate almost total supply collapse but he has hundreds of fighters on Java still so I am not buying that.

Burma has gone soft. Bombardments were getting stiff resistance up to a few days ago. Now his AV is dropping and resistance is dropping across the board. MrKane has ceded Prome and my armies are advancing.



Image
Attachments
burma1944.jpg
burma1944.jpg (513.49 KiB) Viewed 220 times
Image
User avatar
Mike McCreery
Posts: 4362
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2013 2:58 pm

RE: Kane and Unable ;]

Post by Mike McCreery »

Allied forces have recently captured singkawang, Sambas, Tawau, Kudat and Jesselton.

Forces tried to arrive at Kuching to reinforce and were destroyed. 3 large AK's of troops 100+ squads sunk. Not sure if MrKane plans on bringing in more but my main carrier force is 4 hexes west of Sambas right now so he may delay. Credit to sigint for telling me of inbound forces.

I want to explode Kudat and then move northeast into the phillipine islands. MrKane does not have a large airforce base in the phillipines that I have noted. The biggest is Clark Field at 8. Forces are landing on Luzon according to Sigint so I will not take the place without a fight.

Image
Attachments
borneo.jpg
borneo.jpg (417.62 KiB) Viewed 220 times
Image
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Kane and Unable ;]

Post by Lowpe »

He must be worried that with you having Singkawang, that an invasion along Thailand to Indochina is a very real threat! Hence his weakening of Burma.

You are doing very well.
User avatar
Mike McCreery
Posts: 4362
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2013 2:58 pm

RE: Kane and Unable ;]

Post by Mike McCreery »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

He must be worried that with you having Singkawang, that an invasion along Thailand to Indochina is a very real threat! Hence his weakening of Burma.

You are doing very well.


I dont mean he is moving troops, I mean across the board the counter battery fire has ceased and I am actually doing damage to his troops rather than taking counter battery damage. A large stack has moved out of Prome after it got hit by bombers. I think it is supply related. That could change as he retreats toward China.

His potential fears of Indochina are well founded :]


Image
adarbrauner
Posts: 1531
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 3:40 am
Location: Zichron Yaaqov, Israel; Before, Treviso, Italy

RE: Kane and Unable ;]

Post by adarbrauner »

This is tough time for Japan.
User avatar
Mike McCreery
Posts: 4362
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2013 2:58 pm

RE: Kane and Unable ;]

Post by Mike McCreery »

June 19, 1944
The Japanese are walking out of Burma en mass. Mr Kane has ceded Toungoo, Lashio and Taun-Gyi recently and there is movement at Rangoon and further along the trail. Whether he has decided it is a strategic move due to my capture of northern Borneo or critical supply problems I do not know.



Image
Attachments
burma1944jun.jpg
burma1944jun.jpg (478.5 KiB) Viewed 220 times
Image
User avatar
Mike McCreery
Posts: 4362
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2013 2:58 pm

RE: Kane and Unable ;]

Post by Mike McCreery »

Mandano just fell. It was weakly held by 5000 or so SNLF troops in 7 units. My main focus on this vector is Cotabato. I have several good units training for it. It is very weakly held by one Japanese unit.


Image
Attachments
mandano.jpg
mandano.jpg (396.32 KiB) Viewed 220 times
Image
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”