Godzilla {J: Andav} vs. Rodan {A: witpqs}

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1942 June 24

Post by witpqs »

1942 June 24

Here is a look at the Intel Monkey filters I used to get the information for Sian. Remember I then "Export"-ed the information displayed to a CSV file; edited the file in a nice text editor to quickly cut out the stuff I didn't want and add a tiny bit (the "-" characters) to get the list posted earlier.

Image
Attachments
420625SianIM.jpg
420625SianIM.jpg (970.92 KiB) Viewed 236 times
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18300
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: 1942 June 24

Post by RangerJoe »

Pearl Harbor continues to undergo enemy reconnaissance and our numerous ASW TF and search plus ASW aircraft are not able to make contact. DL today is 2/2. Where could they be? We are forming 2 more ASW TF (2x DD each) to fill in a couple of gaps in our ASW TF coverage, but we have no gaps in our search coverage. What is the maximum range of those Japanese submarine-capable float planes?

I don't know the range of the float planes. But I do have a suggestion. If you have not done so, CAP/LRCAP every TF in the area with a few fighters at an altitude of 6k to 8k, they just might shoot the plane down.

As far as that raider is concerned, a few PBYs on Naval attack might be able to tell you what it is as well as drive it away.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1942 June 24

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe
Pearl Harbor continues to undergo enemy reconnaissance and our numerous ASW TF and search plus ASW aircraft are not able to make contact. DL today is 2/2. Where could they be? We are forming 2 more ASW TF (2x DD each) to fill in a couple of gaps in our ASW TF coverage, but we have no gaps in our search coverage. What is the maximum range of those Japanese submarine-capable float planes?

I don't know the range of the float planes. But I do have a suggestion. If you have not done so, CAP/LRCAP every TF in the area with a few fighters at an altitude of 6k to 8k, they just might shoot the plane down.
Something that's been interesting to me is turn after turn the TF's at PH have never had a DL. Karachi, Bombay, SF, LA, Sydney, and so on all have some TF's get scanned. But not PH. I've been wondering if it's due to the sheer number of fighters on CAP duty there?

Anyhow, I'm not going to LRCAP all those ASW TF's. It's not practical to LRCAP the convoys coming and going, which you should read as "I'm too lazy to do that." [:'(]


As far as that raider is concerned, a few PBYs on Naval attack might be able to tell you what it is as well as drive it away.
We should have a good look at it in no more than two turns. Which reminds me: I need to look at the CL's float planes and make sure they have proper orders.
User avatar
zuluhour
Posts: 5244
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 4:16 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: 1942 June 24

Post by zuluhour »

Do you have the agreement about the correct planes on IJN subs?
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18300
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: 1942 June 24

Post by RangerJoe »

Actually, you shouldn't have to CAP every ASW TF, just one in each area. But yes, it can get tedious.

The art of being lazy is not putting off 'til tomorrow what you can do today, the art of being lazy is not bothering to do it at all. [8D]
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1942 June 24

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: zuluhour

Do you have the agreement about the correct planes on IJN subs?
Yes, I think so. I mean: Walter takes care of that. Whatever it is.
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18300
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: 1942 June 24

Post by RangerJoe »

The subs usually come with Glens. But could you imagine putting Rufes on them to fly CAP and shoot down PBYs in the middle of nowhere?
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1942 June 24

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

The subs usually come with Glens. But could you imagine putting Rufes on them to fly CAP and shoot down PBYs in the middle of nowhere?
Not Walter.
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

1942 June 25

Post by witpqs »

1942 June 25

INVADED
Katherine, Changsha, Sian are invested.

CHANGED OWNERSHIP
Tockangbesi-eilanden is occupied by the Japanese



Overall
• No carrier sightings. Squadron Hosho-1 seen in action over Katherine.

• 3 battleships at Pearl Harbor will be finished upgrades in 3 days, another in 5 days. North Carolina will be at Pearl Harbor in about 10 days. I am inclined to wait 3 or 5 days to load for Cantankerous Olfactory but will only wait 10 if circumstances dictate.

• The presence of the scout PB approaching Hawaiian waters is a bit curious. Is the Empire up to something or is this pure distraction? If they are up to something: what?


West Coast USA, Alaska, Hawaii
• Enemy sub activity near San Francisco.

• Enemy surface activity near Johnston Island. The PB has moved ENE.

• All convoys report no contacts.

• The CL TF might intercept the PB tonight or tomorrow. Due to enemy movement today it will be overtaking the PB from astern. Only one CL has float planes (2 of them) and they are searching 100% during daylight.

• A second (old) CL TF has formed at Pearl Harbor to get in front of the intruder.


Pacific
• Enemy sub activity near Pago Pago, Suva.

• All convoys report no contacts.

• Got one!
Submarine attack near Ailinglaplap at 133,118

Japanese Ships
xAKL Kaito Maru, Torpedo hits 1, heavy damage

Allied Ships
SS Trigger

xAKL Kaito Maru is sighted by SS Trigger
SS Trigger launches 2 torpedoes at xAKL Kaito Maru

• During the replay I could have sworn I saw a BB flash on the screen, but I assume it would show up in the report (which it does not).
Sub attack near Ponape at 118,109

Japanese Ships
DD Yugure
DD Kuretake

Allied Ships
SS Haddock

SS Haddock launches 4 torpedoes at DD Yugure
Haddock diving deep ....
DD Kuretake fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Kuretake fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Kuretake fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Kuretake fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Kuretake attacking submerged sub ....
Escort abandons search for sub


New Zealand, Australia, New Caledonia, New Hebrides, Solomons, Papua New Guinea, New Britain
• Enemy sub activity near Sydney

• All convoys report no contacts.

• Sydney port is now size 9; the airfield (8) will now build.

• A good raid on the tanks. 3x B-17's for 2x Zero's. They put two squadrons up today.
Morning Air attack on 8th Tank Regiment, at 76,128 (Katherine)

Weather in hex: Moderate rain

Raid spotted at 20 NM, estimated altitude 5,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 6 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 14

Allied aircraft
B-17E Fortress x 15

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 1 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
B-17E Fortress: 10 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
Vehicles lost 13 (3 destroyed, 10 disabled)

Aircraft Attacking:
4 x B-17E Fortress bombing from 5000 feet
Ground Attack: 8 x 500 lb GP Bomb
3 x B-17E Fortress bombing from 5000 feet
Ground Attack: 8 x 500 lb GP Bomb
5 x B-17E Fortress bombing from 5000 feet
Ground Attack: 8 x 500 lb GP Bomb
3 x B-17E Fortress bombing from 5000 feet
Ground Attack: 8 x 500 lb GP Bomb

CAP engaged:
3rd Ku S-1 with A6M2 Zero (9 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
9 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 10000 , scrambling fighters between 0 and 10000.
Raid is overhead
Hosho-1 with A6M2 Zero (5 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
5 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 10000 , scrambling fighters between 0 and 10000.
Raid is overhead

• Now 3 enemy units at Katherine but the strength and identity of the 3rd unit are unknown.

• The additional B-17 Sqns have finished their journey, flying from Brisbane to Cloncurry without losses. A few stragglers are still following.

• Several squadrons of USA B-26's which have been training at Melbourne are moving to Alice Springs. For now they will ferry supplies to Tennant Creek.


Philippines


DEI, Dutch new Guinea, Borneo, Malaya


China
• Supply is lacking.
Ground combat at Sian (83,41)

Japanese Bombardment attack

Attacking force 2988 troops, 159 guns, 335 vehicles, Assault Value = 2630

Defending force 82698 troops, 238 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 1071

Allied ground losses:
480 casualties reported
Squads: 18 destroyed, 15 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 9 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 4 (1 destroyed, 3 disabled)

Assaulting units:
23rd Tank Regiment
37th Division
34th Division
17th Division
3rd Division
36th Division
3rd Tank Regiment
41st Division
12th Tank Regiment
13th Tank Regiment
25th Division
15th Tank Regiment
9th Tank Regiment
11th Tank Regiment
5th Ind.Hvy.Art Battalion
1st Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
11th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
7th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
2nd Medium Field Artillery Regiment
3rd Hvy.Artillery Regiment
2nd Hvy.Artillery Regiment
4th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
15th Ind.Medium Field Artillery Regiment
8th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
6th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
10th Medium Field Artillery Regiment

Defending units:
98th Chinese/A Corps
4th Chinese Cavalry/B Corps
12th Chinese/A Corps
9th Chinese/C Corps
16th Chinese/B Corps
33rd Chinese/A Corps
4th Chinese Cavalry/C Corps
88th Chinese/B Corps
9th Chinese/B Corps
88th Chinese/A Corps
12th Chinese/C Corps
27th Chinese/A Corps
93rd Chinese/B Corps
129th Red Chinese Division
51st Chinese Corps
38th Chinese/C Corps
93rd Chinese/A Corps
57th Chinese/B Corps
4th Chinese Cavalry/A Corps
12th Chinese/B Corps
61st Chinese/A Corps
57th Chinese/A Corps
38th Chinese/B Corps
16th Chinese/C Corps
92nd Chinese/B Corps
92nd Chinese/A Corps
98th Chinese/B Corps
93rd Chinese/C Corps
33rd Chinese/C Corps
61st Chinese/C Corps
9th Chinese/A Corps
88th Chinese/C Corps
27th Chinese/C Corps
38th Chinese/A Corps
27th Chinese/B Corps
92nd Chinese/C Corps
33rd Chinese/B Corps
16th Chinese/A Corps
98th Chinese/C Corps
57th Chinese/C Corps
15th Chinese Base Force
120th Red Chinese Division
12th Chinese Base Force
37th Group Army
13th Group Army
4th Group Army
Red Chinese Army
61st Chinese/B Corps

• The only AVG Sqn currently in China is pulling out to free up supply for ground troops.


India, Burma, Thailand, Indochina
• Beginning naval search from Trivandrum and Trincomalee; covering most of the approaches to and past Ceylon. Neither the Catalina nor Hudson IIIa squadron is trained as much as I want them to be.


Japan, Korea, Manchuria, Russia
• Keeping them honest.
ASW attack near Tsu at 108,63

Japanese Ships
PB Hong Kong Maru
PB Takunan Maru #8
PB Karimo Maru
PB Yahonui Maru

Allied Ships
SS Trout

SS Trout is sighted by escort
Trout diving deep ....
PB Karimo Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
PB Yahonui Maru attacking submerged sub ....
PB Karimo Maru fails to find sub and abandons search
PB Yahonui Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
PB Yahonui Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
PB Yahonui Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
PB Yahonui Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
Escort abandons search for sub


Complete combat report attached.
Attachments
combatreport.txt
(15.89 KiB) Downloaded 3 times
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1942 June 25

Post by witpqs »

1942 June 25

Current situation.

Image
Attachments
420626Johnston.jpg
420626Johnston.jpg (245.21 KiB) Viewed 236 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: 1942 June 25

Post by Lowpe »

What are we to discern from your last picture?[&:] I obviously am missing something AFB related![:D]
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1942 June 25

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

What are we to discern from your last picture?[&:] I obviously am missing something AFB related![:D]
I should have selected the hex so it would have been highlighted... The enemy PB toward the lower left hand corner of the picture. The pic is just so you can see where it is relative to everything else.

I sort of wonder if a small incursion is meant to trigger a carrier strike; perhaps the Empire has no info on the whereabouts of our carriers?
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20425
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: 1942 June 25

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: witpqs

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

What are we to discern from your last picture?[&:] I obviously am missing something AFB related![:D]
I should have selected the hex so it would have been highlighted... The enemy PB toward the lower left hand corner of the picture. The pic is just so you can see where it is relative to everything else.

I sort of wonder if a small incursion is meant to trigger a carrier strike; perhaps the Empire has no info on the whereabouts of our carriers?
Or he is looking for holes in your search coverage.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1942 June 25

Post by witpqs »

Or he is looking for holes in your search coverage.
Yeah, I sorta wondered about that too. The PB spent two days in the same spot, supporting the idea he wanted it to be seen. I mean a lone PB is not exactly an ambush force. I have also wondered if it sat there as bait because he knows how far my planes can search: a couple of my carriers or some cruisers show up to sink it and KB1 charges in some just outside of search coverage.

I am wondering if he plans any further expansion into the South Pacific. He's only gone to the Solomon Islands and no further in that area; the Gilbert Islands haven't been cleaned up yet. Maybe he's trying to get an idea of my carriers' location before he commits. He knows there are summer upgrades for the Lexington's and the Yorktown's. He doesn't (yet) know I am deferring them.
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20425
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: 1942 June 25

Post by BBfanboy »

Maybe you could fool him - send your Omaha CLs 6 hexes east of the PB then put their float planes on naval attack at 100 feet ... PBs have poor AA and poor damage control.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1942 June 25

Post by witpqs »

I want to confirm something important to preparing for the upcoming operation: carriers can still conduct normal operations with up to 115% of their rated aircraft complement, right?

In other words, Lex has capacity 90, so she can operate up to 90 + 13.5 = 103 aircraft, right?
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

1942 June 26

Post by witpqs »

1942 June 26

INVADED
Katherine, Changsha, Sian, Mengtze are invested.

CHANGED OWNERSHIP



Overall
• No carrier sightings. Sqn Hosho-1 in action over Katherine.


West Coast USA, Alaska, Hawaii
• Enemy sub activity near Pearl Harbor,

• All convoys report no contacts.

• And so... there were two.
Night Time Surface Combat, near Johnston Island at 170,118, Range 8,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
PB Kyo Maru #8, Shell hits 2, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk

Allied Ships
CL Concord
CL Raleigh, Shell hits 1
DD Gridley
DD McCall
DD Maury

Improved night sighting under 96% moonlight
Maximum visibility in Partly Cloudy Conditions and 96% moonlight: 11,000 yards
Range closes to 20,000 yards...
Range closes to 14,000 yards...
Range closes to 8,000 yards...
CONTACT: Japanese lookouts spot Allied task force at 8,000 yards
CONTACT: Allied lookouts spot Japanese task force at 8,000 yards
CL Raleigh engages PB Kyo Maru #8 at 8,000 yards
PB Kyo Maru #8 sunk by CL Concord at 8,000 yards
Combat ends with last Japanese ship sunk...
Night Time Surface Combat, near Johnston Island at 167,116, Range 8,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
PB Nikkai Maru, Shell hits 20, and is sunk

Allied Ships
CL Concord
CL Raleigh, Shell hits 2
DD Gridley
DD McCall
DD Maury

Improved night sighting under 96% moonlight
Maximum visibility in Partly Cloudy Conditions and 96% moonlight: 11,000 yards
Range closes to 20,000 yards...
Range closes to 14,000 yards...
Range closes to 8,000 yards...
CONTACT: Japanese lookouts spot Allied task force at 8,000 yards
CONTACT: Allied lookouts spot Japanese task force at 8,000 yards
DD Maury engages PB Nikkai Maru at 8,000 yards
Range closes to 3,000 yards
CL Raleigh engages PB Nikkai Maru at 3,000 yards
Range closes to 2,000 yards
CL Raleigh engages PB Nikkai Maru at 2,000 yards
DD McCall engages PB Nikkai Maru at 2,000 yards
Nagashima, B. orders Japanese TF to disengage
Range increases to 3,000 yards
CL Raleigh engages PB Nikkai Maru at 3,000 yards
DD Maury engages PB Nikkai Maru at 3,000 yards
DD Gridley engages PB Nikkai Maru at 3,000 yards
CL Raleigh engages PB Nikkai Maru at 3,000 yards
DD Maury engages PB Nikkai Maru at 3,000 yards
DD McCall engages PB Nikkai Maru at 3,000 yards
DD Gridley engages PB Nikkai Maru at 3,000 yards
PB Nikkai Maru sunk by CL Raleigh at 3,000 yards
Combat ends with last Japanese ship sunk...

• So what were they doing?


Pacific
• All convoys report no contacts.


New Zealand, Australia, New Caledonia, New Hebrides, Solomons, Papua New Guinea, New Britain
• Enemy sub activity near Sydney, Vanikoro.

• All convoys report no contacts.

• These experience sub hunters will follow the concentration of subs in SE Australia.
ASW attack near Sydney at 91,167

Japanese Ships
SS I-171, hits 1

Allied Ships
KV Auricula
KV Hollyhock
KV Aster

SS I-171 is located by KV Auricula
KV Hollyhock fails to find sub, continues to search...
KV Aster fails to find sub and abandons search
KV Hollyhock attacking submerged sub ....
KV Hollyhock fails to find sub, continues to search...
KV Hollyhock fails to find sub, continues to search...
KV Hollyhock attacking submerged sub ....
Escort abandons search for sub
Sub attack near Sydney at 91,168

Japanese Ships
SS I-172

Allied Ships
KV Hollyhock
KV Auricula
KV Aster

SS I-172 launches 2 torpedoes at KV Hollyhock
KV Hollyhock fails to find sub, continues to search...
KV Aster fails to find sub and abandons search
KV Hollyhock fails to find sub, continues to search...
KV Hollyhock attacking submerged sub ....
KV Hollyhock fails to find sub, continues to search...
KV Hollyhock fails to find sub, continues to search...
Escort abandons search for sub

• 4x Zero versus 3x B-17's lost but it mattered to the day's ground battle.
Morning Air attack on 47th Infantry Regiment, at 76,128 (Katherine)

Weather in hex: Partial cloud

Raid spotted at 10 NM, estimated altitude 10,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 2 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 10

Allied aircraft
B-17E Fortress x 12

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 2 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
B-17E Fortress: 1 destroyed, 4 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
74 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Aircraft Attacking:
5 x B-17E Fortress bombing from 5000 feet
Ground Attack: 8 x 500 lb GP Bomb
2 x B-17E Fortress bombing from 5000 feet
Ground Attack: 8 x 500 lb GP Bomb
2 x B-17E Fortress bombing from 5000 feet
Ground Attack: 8 x 500 lb GP Bomb
2 x B-17E Fortress bombing from 5000 feet
Ground Attack: 8 x 500 lb GP Bomb

CAP engaged:
3rd Ku S-1 with A6M2 Zero (6 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
6 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 10000 , scrambling fighters between 0 and 10000.
Raid is overhead
Hosho-1 with A6M2 Zero (4 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
4 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 10000 , scrambling fighters between 0 and 10000.
Raid is overhead

Also attacking 4th Division ...
Also attacking 47th Infantry Regiment ...

• Our very low experience tank guys are getting schooled. The modifiers were nice to see.
Ground combat at Katherine (76,128)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 16564 troops, 125 guns, 79 vehicles, Assault Value = 557

Defending force 3935 troops, 21 guns, 122 vehicles, Assault Value = 118

Japanese adjusted assault: 99

Allied adjusted defense: 72

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 3)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 2

Combat modifiers
Defender: preparation(-)
Attacker: disruption(-), fatigue(-), supply(-)

Japanese ground losses:
324 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 25 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Vehicles lost 12 (3 destroyed, 9 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
285 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 6 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 19 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Vehicles lost 12 (1 destroyed, 11 disabled)

Assaulting units:
8th Tank Regiment
4th Division
47th Infantry Regiment

Defending units:
1st Tank Battalion
8th Cav Recce Regiment
19th Australian Battalion
Katherine RAAF Base Force

• That supply(-) for the Imperials might be critical. If we can hold on for a week we will (without interference) close the entry hex side and have more tanks on the scene. The B-17's will pick up the pace to do their part.


Philippines


DEI, Dutch new Guinea, Borneo, Malaya


China
• They're trying to wear us down and it's working.
Ground combat at Sian (83,41)

Japanese Bombardment attack

Attacking force 2988 troops, 159 guns, 335 vehicles, Assault Value = 2666

Defending force 82000 troops, 235 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 1068

Allied ground losses:
229 casualties reported
Squads: 11 destroyed, 25 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 2 (1 destroyed, 1 disabled)

Assaulting units:
34th Division
17th Division
15th Tank Regiment
25th Division
37th Division
3rd Division
41st Division
23rd Tank Regiment
3rd Tank Regiment
12th Tank Regiment
9th Tank Regiment
13th Tank Regiment
36th Division
11th Tank Regiment
15th Ind.Medium Field Artillery Regiment
2nd Hvy.Artillery Regiment
1st Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
7th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
2nd Medium Field Artillery Regiment
6th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
11th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
8th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
4th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
5th Ind.Hvy.Art Battalion
3rd Hvy.Artillery Regiment
10th Medium Field Artillery Regiment

Defending units:
27th Chinese/C Corps
51st Chinese Corps
93rd Chinese/C Corps
92nd Chinese/A Corps
16th Chinese/B Corps
12th Chinese/A Corps
12th Chinese/C Corps
33rd Chinese/A Corps
98th Chinese/A Corps
38th Chinese/A Corps
61st Chinese/A Corps
9th Chinese/C Corps
9th Chinese/B Corps
4th Chinese Cavalry/A Corps
38th Chinese/B Corps
92nd Chinese/C Corps
27th Chinese/A Corps
16th Chinese/C Corps
93rd Chinese/B Corps
92nd Chinese/B Corps
61st Chinese/B Corps
27th Chinese/B Corps
12th Chinese/B Corps
61st Chinese/C Corps
9th Chinese/A Corps
38th Chinese/C Corps
88th Chinese/C Corps
33rd Chinese/C Corps
57th Chinese/B Corps
129th Red Chinese Division
4th Chinese Cavalry/C Corps
16th Chinese/A Corps
88th Chinese/B Corps
33rd Chinese/B Corps
98th Chinese/B Corps
93rd Chinese/A Corps
57th Chinese/A Corps
88th Chinese/A Corps
98th Chinese/C Corps
57th Chinese/C Corps
4th Group Army
Red Chinese Army
120th Red Chinese Division
15th Chinese Base Force
12th Chinese Base Force
37th Group Army
13th Group Army
4th Chinese Cavalry/B Corps

• We have moved a C-47 Sqn (current strength 9 aircraft) from Ledo to Chengtu. Even though it will reduce supply flow into China until sent back, for now it will increase supplies available for defense in Sian.

• An enemy unit has now moved into Mengtze, south of Sian.


India, Burma, Thailand, Indochina
• India is saved: the 267th Tank Bde has arrived. with Exp 5.


Japan, Korea, Manchuria, Russia


Complete combat report attached.
Attachments
combatreport.txt
(24.71 KiB) Downloaded 3 times
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18300
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: 1942 June 26

Post by RangerJoe »

I want to confirm something important to preparing for the upcoming operation: carriers can still conduct normal operations with up to 115% of their rated aircraft complement, right?
I looked it up before and I posted it in a thread. Yes, up to 115% but with a supposed increase in Ops losses

edited to include the link where this was discussed:

CV has 1 too many planes

In other words, Lex has capacity 90, so she can operate up to 90 + 13.5 = 103 aircraft, right?
That is correct according to the manual.
India is saved: the 267th Tank Bde has arrived. with Exp 5.
I buy it out early when it is weak with a lot of devices disabled and use if for garrison while it is training.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1942 June 26

Post by witpqs »

It might just be the Babes scenarios have a little more research in the land TOE's, but this unit withdraws in 307 days. At least the equipment will go to experienced units. [:'(]
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20425
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: 1942 June 26

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: witpqs

It might just be the Babes scenarios have a little more research in the land TOE's, but this unit withdraws in 307 days. At least the equipment will go to experienced units. [:'(]
In my game I gave 267th Tank Bde a good leader (with good admin skill) and put it in Madras with lots of supply and a regional HQ. It took until December 1942 to get morale 90 and experience 30. [:(]
But by then most of the TOE had filled out/recovered from disablement and I felt the tanks would tear up IJA tanks and troops without A/T guns. Might be a good unit to use in a strategic reserve role if the Japanese move into India.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”