OT: Question: The Battle of Savo Island

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
User avatar
Footslogger
Posts: 1250
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 11:46 pm
Location: Washington USA

OT: Question: The Battle of Savo Island

Post by Footslogger »

What was the single most fault, for the Allies defeat at The Battle of Savo Island?

Command?

Communication?

User avatar
btd64
Posts: 15137
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:48 am
Location: Lancaster, OHIO

RE: OT: Question: The Battle of Savo Island

Post by btd64 »

ORIGINAL: Footslogger

What was the single most fault, for the Allies defeat at The Battle of Savo Island?

Command?

Communication?


I vote for Communication. A lack of communication, or a breakdown of communication, caused ships to be out of position. Sightings were poorly pasted along. My 2 cents....GP
IntelUltra7 16cores, 32gb ram, NvidiaGeForceRTX 2050
DW2-Alpha/Beta Tester
WIS Manual Team Lead & Beta Support Team

"Do everything you ask of those you command" Gen. George S. Patton
WiS Discord channel coming soon....
Buckrock
Posts: 676
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:10 am
Location: Not all there

RE: OT: Question: The Battle of Savo Island

Post by Buckrock »

There were multiple factors influencing the result that night but if I had to pick the most significant that influenced the final combat result of 4-0 in cruiser losses, I'd choose Allied communications as well. Failure between the various groups and individual ships to pass on vital sighting and encounter information led to a fatal lack of Allied situational awareness as the enemy were conducting their attacks. Having said that, the Allied failures didn't automatically mean they were bound to suffer such a major tactical defeat. The Japanese still had to be good enough on the night to take the opportunity offered and run with it.
This was the only sig line I could think of.
LeeChard
Posts: 1117
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:24 pm
Location: Michigan

RE: OT: Question: The Battle of Savo Island

Post by LeeChard »

Not putting your best radar equipped ship near the front of the column.
User avatar
MakeeLearn
Posts: 4274
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 1:01 pm

RE: OT: Question: The Battle of Savo Island

Post by MakeeLearn »



Communication of Commands.






User avatar
Lecivius
Posts: 4845
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 12:53 am
Location: Denver

RE: OT: Question: The Battle of Savo Island

Post by Lecivius »

Arrogance.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it!
User avatar
fodder
Posts: 2159
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 9:27 pm
Location: Daytona Beach

RE: OT: Question: The Battle of Savo Island

Post by fodder »

Night!
Image
rms1pa
Posts: 370
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 6:32 am

RE: OT: Question: The Battle of Savo Island

Post by rms1pa »

for what its worth ,

commanders had not made the conversion from peacetime to wartime modes of thought. i have been told the first thing said was "cease fire you are shooting at our own ships". having fueled floatplanes did not help.wardrooms still had stuffed chairs to burn and the paint not stripped. in game terms lack of night experience.

rms/pa
there is a technical term for those who confuse the opinions of an author's characters for the opinions of the author.
the term is IDIOT.
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9304
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: OT: Question: The Battle of Savo Island

Post by Lokasenna »

Lack of experience in night battles and particularly lack of experience in cooperating between commands.
User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: OT: Question: The Battle of Savo Island

Post by m10bob »

Some allied ships captains have been blamed for ignoring an old Napoleonic maxim to..."Follow the sound of the guns"..

The Cpt of the CA Chicago comes to mind.

It was still early in the war and some command personnel factors in combat had not been observed yet.

(Now I will be getting my flame retardant suit on, lol)...and yes...I am a combat vet.
Image

User avatar
zuluhour
Posts: 5246
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 4:16 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: OT: Question: The Battle of Savo Island

Post by zuluhour »

yes, the CO proved inept.
User avatar
Yaab
Posts: 5556
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:09 pm
Location: Poland

RE: OT: Question: The Battle of Savo Island

Post by Yaab »

Savo Island - only savy COs allowed.
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”