Sakhalin - Best combo of port size and L.I. expansion

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
User avatar
RADM.Yamaguchi
Posts: 849
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2019 5:09 pm

Sakhalin - Best combo of port size and L.I. expansion

Post by RADM.Yamaguchi »

Obviously not this guy!

Image
Attachments
Toyohara.jpg
Toyohara.jpg (48.02 KiB) Viewed 309 times
mind_messing
Posts: 3394
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 11:59 am

RE: Sakhalin - Best combo of port size and L.I. expansion

Post by mind_messing »

1. Another large industry centre to provide CAP for when B29s arrive, and one that is removed from the organic air defence network of Honshu-Hokkaido

2. A LOT of supply that can be used better elsewhere.

3. Coastal hex, so can be bombarded.

4. The time taken to expand LI at the base - nearly two years. You'll never (?) pay back the cost (someone check my back of napkin maths please).
User avatar
geofflambert
Posts: 14887
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 2:18 pm
Location: St. Louis

RE: Sakhalin - Best combo of port size and L.I. expansion

Post by geofflambert »

Increase LI where the supply is needed like in China or Manchukuo or Singapore which is near to resources which can be shipped there on a short hop. Sakhalin is a fairly protected route, you're either going to have to put resources on ships or the supplies they make, what's the point? More LI in Hokkaido makes more sense.

mind_messing
Posts: 3394
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 11:59 am

RE: Sakhalin - Best combo of port size and L.I. expansion

Post by mind_messing »

ORIGINAL: geofflambert

Increase LI where the supply is needed like in China or Manchukuo or Singapore which is near to resources which can be shipped there on a short hop. Sakhalin is a fairly protected route, you're either going to have to put resources on ships or the supplies they make, what's the point? More LI in Hokkaido makes more sense.

Plus, quicker uptime to repair factories.

Expanding 1 LI site by 700 = 700 days to full operation.

Expanding 20 LI sites by 35 = 35 days to full operation.
User avatar
RADM.Yamaguchi
Posts: 849
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2019 5:09 pm

RE: Sakhalin - Best combo of port size and L.I. expansion

Post by RADM.Yamaguchi »

Very , Very helpful. Thank you.

expand small
where supply is needed
little to no shipping required
preferably inland
out of range of bombers

perhaps expand HI a little
all the above plus
extra fuel available
User avatar
RADM.Yamaguchi
Posts: 849
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2019 5:09 pm

RE: Sakhalin - Best combo of port size and L.I. expansion

Post by RADM.Yamaguchi »

i really didn't intend to expand LI there

break even at 694 LI is 5/12/45. But you'd still have over 3mm resources there still.
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18294
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Sakhalin - Best combo of port size and L.I. expansion

Post by RangerJoe »

Expand in Manchukuo and northern China. Safer from enemy bombers and less likely to be targeted until the Soviets come in - unless you take them out early. Expand in Fusan to draw more resources there so those extra resources can be shipped two hexes to Japan.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
RADM.Yamaguchi
Posts: 849
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2019 5:09 pm

RE: Sakhalin - Best combo of port size and L.I. expansion

Post by RADM.Yamaguchi »

I think if you expand L.I. by 20 and you have the resources the payback is reached in 11 months.
User avatar
jdsrae
Posts: 2795
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 6:58 am
Location: Gandangara Country

RE: Sakhalin - Best combo of port size and L.I. expansion

Post by jdsrae »

ORIGINAL: RADM.Yamaguchi

Obviously not this guy!

Image

Apparently that was a question put to the 1941 Joint IJ Army/Navy Logistics Officer Basic Course.

You wouldn’t save “all” that fuel. You’d still need 1/20th of it to move the supply instead!
Currently playing my first PBEM, no house rules Scenario 1 as IJ.
AAR link (no SolInvictus): https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4684655
alimentary
Posts: 142
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:56 pm

RE: Sakhalin - Best combo of port size and L.I. expansion

Post by alimentary »

Expand LI by 20, expending 20,000 supplies.

As a result you get +20 supply per day. That takes 1000 days to pay back. That's more than 11 months.
User avatar
RADM.Yamaguchi
Posts: 849
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2019 5:09 pm

RE: Sakhalin - Best combo of port size and L.I. expansion

Post by RADM.Yamaguchi »

my spreadsheet skills peaked at Lotus123.

you're right. i cacurite 9/11/44.
fcooke
Posts: 1158
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2002 10:37 pm
Location: Boston, London, Hoboken, now Warwick, NY

RE: Sakhalin - Best combo of port size and L.I. expansion

Post by fcooke »

123 - that takes me back quite a bit. I found that interface completely non-intuitive. And then there was Lotus Notes. That made 123 look like a gem. Of course now Microsoft keeps tinckering with Excel and IMO making it harder to use. But it is me just being older and cranky.
User avatar
geofflambert
Posts: 14887
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 2:18 pm
Location: St. Louis

RE: Sakhalin - Best combo of port size and L.I. expansion

Post by geofflambert »

I wouldn't expand HI at all. As to resources, you'll have way more than you'll ever use. Don't get tense about resources sitting around in the Philippines or the DEI unused and unshipped. You get plenty for the home islands close at hand. As for refineries you have far more capacity than you'll ever use. Never waste supply points repairing any refineries, ever. Oil fields maybe, if you plan on holding them a long enough time. Leave the refinery at Port Arthur to draw oil from the continent, don't ship any there. Also, pull oil out of China on small tankers and ship it to Nagasaki. If you don't create enough suction oil will just sit in Urumchi and other spots, PA by itself isn't enough of a draw. I like to keep small tankers just sitting in Chinese ports, Hankow and Canton in particular just sucking. It may take a week or more to fill the tanker but that's ok.

User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Sakhalin - Best combo of port size and L.I. expansion

Post by Lowpe »

I do like to build a port up in Sakhalin to rearm the super heavy BBs. I normally don't use the AKE workaround...and have had great success using them in the Aleutians in 1942.

User avatar
Q-Ball
Posts: 7403
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 4:43 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

RE: Sakhalin - Best combo of port size and L.I. expansion

Post by Q-Ball »

ORIGINAL: geofflambert

I wouldn't expand HI at all. As to resources, you'll have way more than you'll ever use. Don't get tense about resources sitting around in the Philippines or the DEI unused and unshipped. You get plenty for the home islands close at hand. As for refineries you have far more capacity than you'll ever use. Never waste supply points repairing any refineries, ever. Oil fields maybe, if you plan on holding them a long enough time.

I agree with all this, except that I think it makes sense to expand HI in Singapore and on Java.

The payback on supplies is 500 days; you won't need to move any resources or fuel there, and it will provide local supply source in case the SRA is cut-off from the Home Islands.

As long as you can hold those spots through mid-'43, I think it makes sense to expand HI there
User avatar
dasboot1960
Posts: 438
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 1:38 pm
Location: St Augustine, Florida

RE: Sakhalin - Best combo of port size and L.I. expansion

Post by dasboot1960 »

Thank you all for turning just about ALL I have ever heard or read about repairing/expanding LI on it's head!
Down like a CLOWN!
User avatar
dasboot1960
Posts: 438
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 1:38 pm
Location: St Augustine, Florida

RE: Sakhalin - Best combo of port size and L.I. expansion

Post by dasboot1960 »

[&o]
Down like a CLOWN!
User avatar
geofflambert
Posts: 14887
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 2:18 pm
Location: St. Louis

RE: Sakhalin - Best combo of port size and L.I. expansion

Post by geofflambert »

ORIGINAL: jdsrae

You wouldn’t save “all” that fuel. You’d still need 1/20th of it to move the supply instead!

This is a key point. You have to have supply and it really hurts to waste any. You can't really waste resources. You'll never have enough ships to move much of it around and it's really hard to run out of.

Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”