
Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Incredibly cheeky of Japan not to wait another day.[;)]


- Attachments
-
- Bgo6QNl.jpg (192.41 KiB) Viewed 353 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
I don't think I will challenge this IJN fleet, unless troop transports appear. The Dutch warships will rebase to Busselton and await developments.


- Attachments
-
- Bgo6QNl.jpg (184.16 KiB) Viewed 353 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
IJA pushing hard on Sian...from two angles. I have retreated from the southern Sian road hold and will move them closer to Sian.


- Attachments
-
- Bgo6QNl.jpg (513.53 KiB) Viewed 353 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
This tells me there is at least some damaged ships at Marcus or in the area...they are within a sprinting range of Lexington and Enterprise. Of course, there are probably 50 Zeroes there...


- Attachments
-
- Bgo6QNl.jpg (158.63 KiB) Viewed 353 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
ORIGINAL: Lawless1
Yes to DL but no to MDL.
Is the a way to determine MDL?
If you play very close attention to the replay yes...and the mouseover does show mdl it is the number after the slash. The manual does a good job on explaining mdl.
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
You really have to fight the temptation to use these bad girls...but the sad fact is they cannot be protected at this stage of the game.
Radar upgrades coming and then shakedown cruises to get their night experience up. I probably should have transferred all their float planes off right away for training and work around Pearl.

Radar upgrades coming and then shakedown cruises to get their night experience up. I probably should have transferred all their float planes off right away for training and work around Pearl.

- Attachments
-
- Bgo6QNl.jpg (196.89 KiB) Viewed 353 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
I do plan on using Warspite though. I will build a defensive SAG around her, and attempt to use her safely...good crew, decent Captain, full radar. Her repairs are finished.[:)]


- Attachments
-
- Bgo6QNl.jpg (407.4 KiB) Viewed 353 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
So if you are still on Dec. 28th (last date I saw on a screenshot), you gained four days by accelerating Warspite's refit on Dec. 7th? That's not bad on three weeks of repairs.ORIGINAL: Lowpe
I do plan on using Warspite though. I will build a defensive SAG around her, and attempt to use her safely...good crew, decent Captain, full radar. Her repairs are finished.[:)]
![]()
I presume you can now accelerate Colorado through the current and Jan 42 refit? Getting Colorado earlier than Feb. 1 with upgraded AA and radar will be a bonus, but DDs to escort her will be an issue. Let's hope your opponent has not staked out the Strait of Juan de Fuca with subs waiting for these two to make their debuts in the game.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
ORIGINAL: BBfanboy
So if you are still on Dec. 28th (last date I saw on a screenshot), you gained four days by accelerating Warspite's refit on Dec. 7th? That's not bad on three weeks of repairs.
I presume you can now accelerate Colorado through the current and Jan 42 refit? Getting Colorado earlier than Feb. 1 with upgraded AA and radar will be a bonus, but DDs to escort her will be an issue. Let's hope your opponent has not staked out the Strait of Juan de Fuca with subs waiting for these two to make their debuts in the game.
Yep...Dec 28th. Colorado will get rushed now...but, you can't rush the refit that starts in Jan.
I have lots of ASW ships in the area, and will patrol with more air to escort Warspite out.

- Attachments
-
- il_fullxfu..876_rjx6.jpg (440.54 KiB) Viewed 353 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Turn is away...and the deathstar, such that it is, is heading for Marcus...won't make much progress today as the op points spent rearming and reloading was high. Even managed to replenish missing plane frames. I plan on a naval bombardment and close in raid on Marcus.
Hoping we avoid the Iboats.
Hoping we avoid the Iboats.
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Supplies in China now up to 134K, adding every day...but soon Ramree will come under threat, as I can see Japan sending units up the Chiang Mai railway.
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
This is like hunting the Bismark, but sides reversed, a thrill ride with each combat replay.
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Dec 28, 1941
Dorniers continue to do good work...

Dorniers continue to do good work...

- Attachments
-
- animatedarmorimage.jpg (83.49 KiB) Viewed 353 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Chinese hold for now, 1-2...but, elsewhere invasion Australia continues!


- Attachments
-
- admiral.jpg (366.52 KiB) Viewed 353 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
All out for Oz!


- Attachments
-
- animatedarmorimage.jpg (269.13 KiB) Viewed 353 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Here they come...


- Attachments
-
- animatedarmorimage.jpg (233.58 KiB) Viewed 353 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Dec is cyclone season.
You could do with a big Cat 5 in the Coral Sea right about now.
You could do with a big Cat 5 in the Coral Sea right about now.
Currently playing my first PBEM, no house rules Scenario 1 as IJ.
AAR link (no SolInvictus): https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4684655
AAR link (no SolInvictus): https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4684655
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Ok...this could be glorious! I don't think Japan knows I could refuel, rearm, take plane replacements and Lexington is still combat ready after taking two 20cm hits (one of which to the flight deck).
We have the intel advantage and will be able to get behind the IJN...the IJN has no bombers, letting us set maximum effort into an offensive strike.

We have the intel advantage and will be able to get behind the IJN...the IJN has no bombers, letting us set maximum effort into an offensive strike.

- Attachments
-
- animatedarmorimage.jpg (385.43 KiB) Viewed 353 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
I think there is another CVE sunk too...that is a shocking amount of losses in December -- even for a scenario 2 game I think.


- Attachments
-
- animatedarmorimage.jpg (123.88 KiB) Viewed 353 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
That is impressive
Really shows that a very ambitious attack has big drawbacks.
Have you considered the possibility that he will land directly at Sydney btw?
Really shows that a very ambitious attack has big drawbacks.
Have you considered the possibility that he will land directly at Sydney btw?