Is Attrition rule is Bias at 1:1?

[Rexzapper]

ORIGINAL: chuckfourth
Look its no wonder I have concerns about the game. Moderators in both games are Bias or at best too ignorant to be in the role. WITE 1 was definitely bias making it a 80$ lemon. I am not making that mistake again.

In WITE 1 bullying me was condoned by the Moderator. Same thing is happening here, that tells you there is still a problem with the game.

Ouch, how rude, I think you're not right, honestly

[Bamilus]

ORIGINAL: chuckfourth

Look its no wonder I have concerns about the game. Moderators in both games are Bias or at best too ignorant to be in the role. WITE 1 was definitely bias making it a 80$ lemon. I am not making that mistake again.

In WITE 1 bullying me was condoned by the Moderator. Same thing is happening here, that tells you there is still a problem with the game.

Cya!

[GloriousRuse]

Yes, those mods and devs with their PhDs, exhaustive research, real world operational and strategic level experience, decades of designing war games centered on WWII, and literally hundreds of test games in HvH, HvAI, and AIvAI with wins on each side reasonably distributed and updates made where results began straying too far form the historical, they are clearly guilty of ignorance and bias because of a misinterpretation of a rule combined with a burning desire for ubermensch to take Moscow as a default outcome. We all just missed it until we were shown the light; I hereby award you the Internet Medal of Truth for your service to the community.

[Erik Rutins]

Hi everyone,

One of the key forum rules is civility. Even if you strongly disagree with a poster, consider their question invalid or dislike something about a game or consider you would have designed it differently, all discussion has to remain polite and without personal attacks. I'm locking this thread, as I don't think from a game standpoint there's more to be learned here, but also as a warning to avoid making arguments personal in the future.

Regards,

- Erik