Disaster at Shortland!

Uncommon Valor: Campaign for the South Pacific covers the campaigns for New Guinea, New Britain, New Ireland and the Solomon chain.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Tankerace, siRkid

ruffels
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2003 5:47 am
Location: Whitby, Ontario, Canada

Disaster at Shortland!

Post by ruffels »

Well, I should have listened. I thought I could. I KNEW I could...but I was wrong. Sent the entire Pacific Fleet and two Marine Divisions against Shortland after a long and intense bombing campaign. My boys are getting shot up on the beach and almost my entire merchant marine is on the bottom :( The 1st Marine Headquarters is down to 70 men :eek: The Japs had 60,000 troops on the island and a fortress at 9 :mad: Well, we've got that down to 7 and I may end up taking the island but at what a cost!
Furthur to the plane issue at one point I had 98 Wildcats on CAP above the fleet and they were attacked by 18 zeroes. What's that 5 to 1? Well each side took 8 losses. Doesn't seem right.
Hey, is there anyway to transfer troops from transports to LST's. I thought about this later. That would have alowed me to keep my transports a hex away and move the troops in on those. Is this possible. Am I an idiot?

More later...
User avatar
Hornblower
Posts: 1361
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 1:02 am
Location: New York'er relocated to Chicago

If your and Idiot, then so am I!!

Post by Hornblower »

If your and Idiot, then so am I!! - I had the same sort of experiance at Kevieng. I thought there was 1 division there, so I tossed in 2 marine div's. Much to my suprise there was @60,000 total Japanese troops there!!! :eek: :eek: (apparently it was a Japanese dumping ground when I cut off supply to rabaul- thank goodness they weren't all Inf) When everything was all said and done I had to pull in 3 more divisions, and use every level bomber I could lay my hands on to finally take it..
HMSWarspite
Posts: 1405
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 10:38 pm
Location: Bristol, UK

Post by HMSWarspite »

Use the recon, Luke. Lots of recon. :)
I have a cunning plan, My Lord
User avatar
pasternakski
Posts: 5567
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2002 7:42 pm

Post by pasternakski »

The problem with recon is the limited size of the information window. If you get detailed information about the units present, you only see five units, no matter how many are actually there. If all you get is the type of unit, you still only see 10, and you have no idea how strong they might be.
Put my faith in the people
And the people let me down.
So, I turned the other way,
And I carry on anyhow.
User avatar
mogami
Posts: 11053
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2000 8:00 am
Location: You can't get here from there

Recon

Post by mogami »

Hi, Thats been fixed in WITP you now get a total for the hex.
Image




I'm not retreating, I'm attacking in a different direction!
ruffels
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2003 5:47 am
Location: Whitby, Ontario, Canada

There they were...gone!

Post by ruffels »

Continuing on my tale of woe...the 1st and 2nd Marine Divisions were wiped out. How depressing :( So I lost countless ships, two divisions and I'm now 2000 points behind the AI and its March 43. I'll fight on...
User avatar
von Murrin
Posts: 1611
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2001 10:00 am
Location: That from which there is no escape.

Post by von Murrin »

Ow. Owwwww.... Stop...

When in doubt, throw every division you have at it.

My personal invasion "trigger" numbers for the big Japanese bases:

Shortlands: 4ID + Support.
Rabaul: 6ID + Support.
Kavieng: 5-7ID + Support. Depends on the previous two.

Allied for good measure:

Luganville: 4ID + Support
Noumea: The kitchen sink.
Townsville: 3ID pre-11/42; post-11/42 Impossible?
Brisbane: Impossible?
I give approximately two fifths of a !#$% at any given time!
User avatar
Hornblower
Posts: 1361
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 1:02 am
Location: New York'er relocated to Chicago

Post by Hornblower »

EWWWWW... Sorry. So long as you learn from it, its not a total loss. At least thats what I tell myself
User avatar
pauk
Posts: 4156
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Zagreb,Croatia

recon

Post by pauk »

HMSWarspite wrote:Use the recon, Luke. Lots of recon. :)
:D :D :D :D
Image
User avatar
pasternakski
Posts: 5567
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2002 7:42 pm

Post by pasternakski »

Mogami wrote:Hi, Thats been fixed in WITP you now get a total for the hex.
I might have to buy you a beer or three yet.
Put my faith in the people
And the people let me down.
So, I turned the other way,
And I carry on anyhow.
markbroughton
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 9:13 pm
Location: Bedfordshire

Post by markbroughton »

I thought it was just me

I tried to land 2 Marine divs and support at Shortland and got creamed. I lost 18000+ troops I managed to withdraw some of the units which are now recovering at Nomoua.

That taught me an important lesson.
User avatar
Hard Sarge
Posts: 22145
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2000 8:00 am
Location: garfield hts ohio usa
Contact:

RE: There they were...gone!

Post by Hard Sarge »

Hi Ruffels
did you bypass Shortland and cut them off first, or did you go head on to them ?

next time by pass that base, land on the big Island and build up the Airfields there, let Shortland rot on the vine for a month or so, and pound them with air

once you don't see Flak coming up you have pretty much burned out there supply levels (keep some ships in the port area and planes on long range cap over the field)

then plot your landings

most games, if Cannel don't become a major battle field, the troops go to shortland instead

HARD_Sarge
Image
User avatar
pasternakski
Posts: 5567
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2002 7:42 pm

RE: There they were...gone!

Post by pasternakski »

What Sarge said.

And be sure to bring along plenty of combat engineers to deal with fortifications.

Clear any minefields, then run a group of battleships on bombardment missions for a few weeks.

You have to be patient. Isolate, reduce, then invade.
Put my faith in the people
And the people let me down.
So, I turned the other way,
And I carry on anyhow.
joliverlay
Posts: 661
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2003 5:12 am

RE: Disaster at Shortlands---for Japanese

Post by joliverlay »

HARD Sarge is right....bypass them and hit them where they aint!

In one of my Scenario 19 PBMs my opponent fortified IRAU, the Canal, and some other small islands north of Esprito Santo. He also held PM and Gillia.

My solution- I took Russel Island (Rossel??) near Gillia Gillia and then went to Shortland. It had almost no garrison!!! Now in 5/43 I've got LBA and CVs across his supply lines! I imagine he has three divisions or more out of supply. I've also bypassed Gilla and PM and landed on the north side of PM.....bypasing more enemy troops!

I can't wait for WIP
User avatar
Odin
Posts: 1045
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Germany, Wanne-Eickel

RE: Disaster at Shortlands---for Japanese

Post by Odin »

I my current game i took Munda and i´m loading right now base forces and seabees on it to upgrade the airfield...the next objective should be Kieta, because recon flights show mw that shortland has a strong garrison and 3 coastal defence units.

I will take Kieta, build it up and block shortland, later i will send some units from Noumea and kill whats left on this starving island[:D]
Image
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: Disaster at Shortlands---for Japanese

Post by crsutton »

Yes, if you are the Allies and have air superiority, then you should never be attack a base that has any supply. Bomb the port for a while. It will be a lot easier then to take it.
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
madflava13
Posts: 1501
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Alexandria, VA

RE: Disaster at Shortlands---for Japanese

Post by madflava13 »

Did anyone check the date on that original post? Let's hope he still needs the advice 3 months later! The one positive of that hacker is some unanswered questions are getting taken care of finally!

hehe
"The Paraguayan Air Force's request for spraying subsidies was not as Paraguayan as it were..."
User avatar
Odin
Posts: 1045
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Germany, Wanne-Eickel

RE: Disaster at Shortlands---for Japanese

Post by Odin »

Ups...*lol*
Image
User avatar
Hard Sarge
Posts: 22145
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2000 8:00 am
Location: garfield hts ohio usa
Contact:

RE: Disaster at Shortlands---for Japanese

Post by Hard Sarge »

LOL
yes, I seen the date of the first post, but it was something that I knew the anwser to, so posted anyways :)

HARD_Sarge
Image
User avatar
foliveti
Posts: 375
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 7:24 pm
Location: Buffalo, NY

RE: There they were...gone!

Post by foliveti »

ORIGINAL: pasternakski

What Sarge said.

And be sure to bring along plenty of combat engineers to deal with fortifications.

Clear any minefields, then run a group of battleships on bombardment missions for a few weeks.

You have to be patient. Isolate, reduce, then invade.
While I realize this thread is 3 months old, it raises an interesting question. It indicates that using combat engineers helps against fortifications. How does that work?
Frank
Post Reply

Return to “Uncommon Valor - Campaign for the South Pacific”