Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
The current TOE of the Australian Divisions are killers...and the upgraded TOE does add some AA and a MTN guns but at a great reduction in firepower...so I can't see a reason to upgrade them. Merely given them a supporting AA unit.
What happens to the excess devices after a TOE upgrade? Goes back to the pool eventually?
What happens to the excess devices after a TOE upgrade? Goes back to the pool eventually?
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Toying with the idea of using 3 fleet carriers ambush the returning battleships after the next bombardment run....totally depends upon what Japan is doing with the KB, but I think it would be pretty successful. At present the KB is a tad too close...and, sadly, I fear I will do the October upgrades instead....but I bet there will still be this opportunity in two weeks time. We shall see and start making provisions for this crazy op. By then tho, it is likely their will be akes in the Marianas.
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Less load cost will make the Division easier to transport and land amphibiously. 25 pounder guns take a while to unload.Lowpe wrote: Sun Feb 27, 2022 1:54 pm The current TOE of the Australian Divisions are killers...and the upgraded TOE does add some AA and a MTN guns but at a great reduction in firepower...so I can't see a reason to upgrade them. Merely given them a supporting AA unit.
What happens to the excess devices after a TOE upgrade? Goes back to the pool eventually?
animated armor image.jpg
I am sure the excess devices are sent to the pools. Arrival time probably depends on where the unit was when the upgrade happened.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
- JohnDillworth
- Posts: 3104
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 5:22 pm
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
My experience attacking BB's with carriers at this point in the war is torpedoes don't work. You might end up getting a dozen hits with bombs that don't penetrate nor do much beyond some operational damage and you will lose a lot of SBD's doing it. BB's can soak up a lot of dive bomber hits without suffering any critical damage. You mileage may vary.
Lowpe wrote: Sun Feb 27, 2022 2:24 pm Toying with the idea of using 3 fleet carriers ambush the returning battleships after the next bombardment run....totally depends upon what Japan is doing with the KB, but I think it would be pretty successful. At present the KB is a tad too close...and, sadly, I fear I will do the October upgrades instead....but I bet there will still be this opportunity in two weeks time. We shall see and start making provisions for this crazy op. By then tho, it is likely their will be akes in the Marianas.
animated armor image.jpg
Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
October 1, 1942
The only attack today by Japan:
The only attack today by Japan:
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Very good point! Thanks for reminding me.JohnDillworth wrote: Sun Feb 27, 2022 11:28 pm My experience attacking BB's with carriers at this point in the war is torpedoes don't work.

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Fair point, but I bet these troops never see a transport....they are going to be slogging thru overland to Vinh and Hong Kong I hope.BBfanboy wrote: Sun Feb 27, 2022 9:59 pm
Less load cost will make the Division easier to transport and land amphibiously. 25 pounder guns take a while to unload.
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
This picture does not appear, even if clicked on. Can you try to reattach it, please? (your pictures are always very informative!)
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
I wonder why...it is there on my screen.
Last edited by Lowpe on Tue Mar 01, 2022 12:07 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Huh, now it doesn't appear on my screen with this last post?
That was drag and drop and load file methods....oh well?
I guess no graphics for awhile?
But, no worries, we have emojiis!
Combat report for the above battle in China:
Ground combat at 78,51 (near Chihkiang)
Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 17672 troops, 360 guns, 1315 vehicles, Assault Value = 790
Defending force 29634 troops, 122 guns, 29 vehicles, Assault Value = 721
Japanese adjusted assault: 611
Allied adjusted defense: 1417
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2
Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:
Japanese ground losses:
430 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 28 disabled
Non Combat: 3 destroyed, 15 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 15 disabled
Vehicles lost 47 (7 destroyed, 40 disabled)
Allied ground losses:
1161 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 168 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Assaulting units:
17th Tank Regiment
1st Tank Division
2nd Tank Division
Guards Tank Division
12th Army
6th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
Defending units:
86th Chinese Corps
5th Chinese Cavalry Corps
20th Chinese Corps
43rd Cavalry Regiment
50th Chinese Corps
4th Chinese/A Corps
24th Indian Mountain Gun Regiment
20th Artillery Regiment
That was drag and drop and load file methods....oh well?
I guess no graphics for awhile?

But, no worries, we have emojiis!

Combat report for the above battle in China:
Ground combat at 78,51 (near Chihkiang)
Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 17672 troops, 360 guns, 1315 vehicles, Assault Value = 790
Defending force 29634 troops, 122 guns, 29 vehicles, Assault Value = 721
Japanese adjusted assault: 611
Allied adjusted defense: 1417
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2
Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:
Japanese ground losses:
430 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 28 disabled
Non Combat: 3 destroyed, 15 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 15 disabled
Vehicles lost 47 (7 destroyed, 40 disabled)
Allied ground losses:
1161 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 168 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Assaulting units:
17th Tank Regiment
1st Tank Division
2nd Tank Division
Guards Tank Division
12th Army
6th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
Defending units:
86th Chinese Corps
5th Chinese Cavalry Corps
20th Chinese Corps
43rd Cavalry Regiment
50th Chinese Corps
4th Chinese/A Corps
24th Indian Mountain Gun Regiment
20th Artillery Regiment
Last edited by Lowpe on Mon Feb 28, 2022 1:36 pm, edited 4 times in total.
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
October 2, 1942
This series of air missions shows why a fleet engagement with the Japanese KB would be a bad idea. My pilots are decent, but every attack the IJ fighters manage to get thru to the bombers.
This action is in the Gilberts, a bit east of Makin....picture it in your mind!
Morning Air attack on TF, near Makin at 138,125
Weather in hex: Moderate rain
Raid spotted at 20 NM, estimated altitude 16,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 9 minutes
Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 16
A6M2-N Rufe x 2
A6M5 Zero x 2
Allied aircraft
P-40E Warhawk x 31
F4F-4 Wildcat x 11
TBF-1 Avenger x 15
Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 2 destroyed
A6M5 Zero: 1 destroyed
Allied aircraft losses
P-40E Warhawk: 1 destroyed
TBF-1 Avenger: 2 destroyed, 7 damaged
Japanese Ships
CA Mikuma
DD Suruyame
DD Susuki
Aircraft Attacking:
10 x TBF-1 Avenger launching torpedoes at 200 feet
Naval Attack: 1 x 22.4in Mk 13 Torp.
3 x TBF-1 Avenger launching torpedoes at 200 feet
Naval Attack: 1 x 22.4in Mk 13 Torp.
This series of air missions shows why a fleet engagement with the Japanese KB would be a bad idea. My pilots are decent, but every attack the IJ fighters manage to get thru to the bombers.
This action is in the Gilberts, a bit east of Makin....picture it in your mind!

Morning Air attack on TF, near Makin at 138,125
Weather in hex: Moderate rain
Raid spotted at 20 NM, estimated altitude 16,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 9 minutes
Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 16
A6M2-N Rufe x 2
A6M5 Zero x 2
Allied aircraft
P-40E Warhawk x 31
F4F-4 Wildcat x 11
TBF-1 Avenger x 15
Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 2 destroyed
A6M5 Zero: 1 destroyed
Allied aircraft losses
P-40E Warhawk: 1 destroyed
TBF-1 Avenger: 2 destroyed, 7 damaged
Japanese Ships
CA Mikuma
DD Suruyame
DD Susuki
Aircraft Attacking:
10 x TBF-1 Avenger launching torpedoes at 200 feet
Naval Attack: 1 x 22.4in Mk 13 Torp.
3 x TBF-1 Avenger launching torpedoes at 200 feet
Naval Attack: 1 x 22.4in Mk 13 Torp.
Last edited by Lowpe on Mon Feb 28, 2022 1:31 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Morning Air attack on TF, near Makin at 138,125
Weather in hex: Moderate rain
Raid spotted at 19 NM, estimated altitude 16,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 8 minutes
Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 8
A6M2-N Rufe x 1
Allied aircraft
P-40E Warhawk x 18
F4F-4 Wildcat x 6
SBD-3 Dauntless x 12
TBF-1 Avenger x 7
Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 2 destroyed
A6M2-N Rufe: 1 destroyed
Allied aircraft losses
SBD-3 Dauntless: 1 destroyed, 3 damaged
TBF-1 Avenger: 1 destroyed, 2 damaged
Japanese Ships
DD Kagero
CL Tenryu, Bomb hits 1, on fire
DD Kisaragi
Aircraft Attacking:
6 x TBF-1 Avenger launching torpedoes at 200 feet
Naval Attack: 1 x 22.4in Mk 13 Torp.
4 x SBD-3 Dauntless releasing from 3000'
Naval Attack: 1 x 1000 lb SAP Bomb
7 x SBD-3 Dauntless releasing from 2000'
Naval Attack: 1 x 1000 lb SAP Bomb
Weather in hex: Moderate rain
Raid spotted at 19 NM, estimated altitude 16,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 8 minutes
Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 8
A6M2-N Rufe x 1
Allied aircraft
P-40E Warhawk x 18
F4F-4 Wildcat x 6
SBD-3 Dauntless x 12
TBF-1 Avenger x 7
Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 2 destroyed
A6M2-N Rufe: 1 destroyed
Allied aircraft losses
SBD-3 Dauntless: 1 destroyed, 3 damaged
TBF-1 Avenger: 1 destroyed, 2 damaged
Japanese Ships
DD Kagero
CL Tenryu, Bomb hits 1, on fire
DD Kisaragi
Aircraft Attacking:
6 x TBF-1 Avenger launching torpedoes at 200 feet
Naval Attack: 1 x 22.4in Mk 13 Torp.
4 x SBD-3 Dauntless releasing from 3000'
Naval Attack: 1 x 1000 lb SAP Bomb
7 x SBD-3 Dauntless releasing from 2000'
Naval Attack: 1 x 1000 lb SAP Bomb
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Makin at 138,125
Weather in hex: Clear sky
Raid spotted at 7 NM, estimated altitude 20,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 3 minutes
Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 15
A6M2-N Rufe x 1
A6M5 Zero x 2
Allied aircraft
P-40E Warhawk x 20
F4F-4 Wildcat x 7
TBF-1 Avenger x 8
Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 1 destroyed
A6M2-N Rufe: 1 destroyed
Allied aircraft losses
P-40E Warhawk: 1 destroyed
F4F-4 Wildcat: 1 destroyed
TBF-1 Avenger: 5 destroyed
TBF-1 Avenger: 1 destroyed by flak
Japanese Ships
CA Mikuma
Weather in hex: Clear sky
Raid spotted at 7 NM, estimated altitude 20,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 3 minutes
Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 15
A6M2-N Rufe x 1
A6M5 Zero x 2
Allied aircraft
P-40E Warhawk x 20
F4F-4 Wildcat x 7
TBF-1 Avenger x 8
Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 1 destroyed
A6M2-N Rufe: 1 destroyed
Allied aircraft losses
P-40E Warhawk: 1 destroyed
F4F-4 Wildcat: 1 destroyed
TBF-1 Avenger: 5 destroyed
TBF-1 Avenger: 1 destroyed by flak
Japanese Ships
CA Mikuma
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Makin at 138,125
Weather in hex: Clear sky
Raid spotted at 17 NM, estimated altitude 18,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 7 minutes
Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 5
A6M5 Zero x 1
Allied aircraft
P-40E Warhawk x 33
F4F-4 Wildcat x 7
SBD-3 Dauntless x 13
TBF-1 Avenger x 8
Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 1 destroyed
Allied aircraft losses
SBD-3 Dauntless: 1 destroyed, 1 damaged
TBF-1 Avenger: 1 destroyed, 2 damaged
Japanese Ships
DD Yukikaze
DD Tawakaze
CL Tenryu
DD Yamanagiri
DD Kisaragi
Aircraft Attacking:
7 x TBF-1 Avenger launching torpedoes at 200 feet
Naval Attack: 1 x 22.4in Mk 13 Torp.
5 x SBD-3 Dauntless releasing from 2000'
Naval Attack: 1 x 1000 lb SAP Bomb
3 x SBD-3 Dauntless releasing from 3000'
Naval Attack: 1 x 1000 lb SAP Bomb
4 x SBD-3 Dauntless releasing from 4000'
Naval Attack: 1 x 1000 lb SAP Bomb
Weather in hex: Clear sky
Raid spotted at 17 NM, estimated altitude 18,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 7 minutes
Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 5
A6M5 Zero x 1
Allied aircraft
P-40E Warhawk x 33
F4F-4 Wildcat x 7
SBD-3 Dauntless x 13
TBF-1 Avenger x 8
Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 1 destroyed
Allied aircraft losses
SBD-3 Dauntless: 1 destroyed, 1 damaged
TBF-1 Avenger: 1 destroyed, 2 damaged
Japanese Ships
DD Yukikaze
DD Tawakaze
CL Tenryu
DD Yamanagiri
DD Kisaragi
Aircraft Attacking:
7 x TBF-1 Avenger launching torpedoes at 200 feet
Naval Attack: 1 x 22.4in Mk 13 Torp.
5 x SBD-3 Dauntless releasing from 2000'
Naval Attack: 1 x 1000 lb SAP Bomb
3 x SBD-3 Dauntless releasing from 3000'
Naval Attack: 1 x 1000 lb SAP Bomb
4 x SBD-3 Dauntless releasing from 4000'
Naval Attack: 1 x 1000 lb SAP Bomb
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
In China, picture it....massive front, the IJA Tank Army of the Apocalypse attacks again....China is bringing in more artillery and a fresh Corp...should be arriving over the next few days. Will rotate back the more disabled corps to recover.
Ground combat at 78,51 (near Chihkiang)
Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 17453 troops, 360 guns, 1314 vehicles, Assault Value = 753
Defending force 28789 troops, 122 guns, 29 vehicles, Assault Value = 610
Japanese adjusted assault: 398
Allied adjusted defense: 985
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2
Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), supply(-)
Attacker:
Japanese ground losses:
580 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 41 disabled
Non Combat: 9 destroyed, 13 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 10 disabled
Vehicles lost 27 (18 destroyed, 9 disabled)
Allied ground losses:
547 casualties reported
Squads: 3 destroyed, 76 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 8 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Assaulting units:
17th Tank Regiment
2nd Tank Division
1st Tank Division
Guards Tank Division
12th Army
6th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
Defending units:
86th Chinese Corps
20th Chinese Corps
43rd Cavalry Regiment
50th Chinese Corps
5th Chinese Cavalry Corps
4th Chinese/A Corps
24th Indian Mountain Gun Regiment
20th Artillery Regiment
Ground combat at 78,51 (near Chihkiang)
Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 17453 troops, 360 guns, 1314 vehicles, Assault Value = 753
Defending force 28789 troops, 122 guns, 29 vehicles, Assault Value = 610
Japanese adjusted assault: 398
Allied adjusted defense: 985
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2
Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), supply(-)
Attacker:
Japanese ground losses:
580 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 41 disabled
Non Combat: 9 destroyed, 13 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 10 disabled
Vehicles lost 27 (18 destroyed, 9 disabled)
Allied ground losses:
547 casualties reported
Squads: 3 destroyed, 76 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 8 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Assaulting units:
17th Tank Regiment
2nd Tank Division
1st Tank Division
Guards Tank Division
12th Army
6th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
Defending units:
86th Chinese Corps
20th Chinese Corps
43rd Cavalry Regiment
50th Chinese Corps
5th Chinese Cavalry Corps
4th Chinese/A Corps
24th Indian Mountain Gun Regiment
20th Artillery Regiment
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
And finally, a slug of Chinese in the mountains north of Ankang are forced to retreat by the lesser Tank Army of the Apocalypse....which is bad, I had hoped they didn't have a valid retreat path. However, now they will head out in three different vectors to cut IJ supply lines and eventually be reborn in Chungking.
Ground combat at 81,40 (near Tienshui)
Japanese Shock attack
Attacking force 16977 troops, 159 guns, 671 vehicles, Assault Value = 649
Defending force 20996 troops, 75 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 32
Japanese adjusted assault: 627
Allied adjusted defense: 178
Japanese assault odds: 3 to 1
Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), fatigue(-), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker: shock(+)
Japanese ground losses:
173 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 17 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Allied ground losses:
7101 casualties reported
Squads: 376 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 287 destroyed, 25 disabled
Engineers: 24 destroyed, 4 disabled
Guns lost 33 (29 destroyed, 4 disabled)
Units retreated 5
Defeated Allied Units Retreating!
Assaulting units:
51st Recon Regiment
15th Tank Regiment
3rd Tank Regiment
13th Tank Regiment
40th Division
12th Tank Regiment
23rd Tank Regiment
18th Tank Regiment
9th Tank Regiment
19th Tank Regiment
11th Tank Regiment
1st Mortar Battalion
51st Ind.Mtn.Gun Battalion
Defending units:
57th Chinese Corps
13th Chinese Corps
76th Chinese/B Corps
76th Chinese/A Corps
76th Chinese/C Corps

Ground combat at 81,40 (near Tienshui)
Japanese Shock attack
Attacking force 16977 troops, 159 guns, 671 vehicles, Assault Value = 649
Defending force 20996 troops, 75 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 32
Japanese adjusted assault: 627
Allied adjusted defense: 178
Japanese assault odds: 3 to 1
Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), fatigue(-), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker: shock(+)
Japanese ground losses:
173 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 17 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Allied ground losses:
7101 casualties reported
Squads: 376 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 287 destroyed, 25 disabled
Engineers: 24 destroyed, 4 disabled
Guns lost 33 (29 destroyed, 4 disabled)
Units retreated 5
Defeated Allied Units Retreating!
Assaulting units:
51st Recon Regiment
15th Tank Regiment
3rd Tank Regiment
13th Tank Regiment
40th Division
12th Tank Regiment
23rd Tank Regiment
18th Tank Regiment
9th Tank Regiment
19th Tank Regiment
11th Tank Regiment
1st Mortar Battalion
51st Ind.Mtn.Gun Battalion
Defending units:
57th Chinese Corps
13th Chinese Corps
76th Chinese/B Corps
76th Chinese/A Corps
76th Chinese/C Corps
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Ok, I don't think I can do an AAR with no pictures.
Guess I will post something on the Tech folder...

Guess I will post something on the Tech folder...
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
I don't see it either.
Intel Monkey: https://sites.google.com/view/staffmonkeys/home
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
oh well, no joy.
Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Nomad is also reporting that he cannot post images. Forum is still having issues getting migrations done, I guess. It was down this morning when I tried to get to it.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth