A New Set of BTS, RA, and Treaty Mods

Please post here for questions and discussion about scenario design, art and sound modding and the game editor for WITP Admiral's Edition.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
1EyedJacks
Posts: 2304
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 6:26 am
Location: Reno, NV

Re: A New Set of BTS, RA, and Treaty Mods

Post by 1EyedJacks »

RangerJoe wrote: Sun Feb 04, 2024 6:22 pm
1EyedJacks wrote: Sun Feb 04, 2024 4:53 pm
JanSako wrote: Fri Feb 02, 2024 8:30 pm Depends on how 'plausible' you want to go or how far off.
I do not see it plausible to go with 0 BB's. BB's was what won the previous wars & no major naval power would go all in on an untested concept like the CV. That is what CV's were in the 20's.
Going heavy on CV's and having more of them in the build Q once their power has been demonstrated (say after Pearl), yeah, by all means. Obviously the lead time needed to build matters too, of course.

Funny, I was going to bring up the example of tank not being a (mainstream) major factor in land war planning until it prove it's worth in Spain (a bit) and Poland, then I remembered that SOV went pretty much all in on tanks. That they were not considered a 'major player' pre-ww2 or that they did not really know what to do with all those thousands of tanks at the beginning is a different issue, of course! :-)

I am just thinking that if the tank gamble did not work, the Soviets still had Infantry & especially artillery to fall back to. What would Japan have if an all-in on CV did not work?

Or, putting an alt-history hat on, what sort of event would be plausible that would demonstrate that the all-in CV is a valid doctrine change?
Yamamoto was in the US for a bit - what would he have seen realistically? The Hosho was the first actual flat top - right? Yamamoto was in the US in the early 20s, did flight training in 1924 (Japan), and was back in the US from 26-28. America and the British Navy were filling out DB airframes. I'm not sure when the first Torpedo Plane came out - the TBD-1?

Ummmmm . . .

Maybe the first torpedo plane came out before the First World War?

". . . The first successful aerial torpedo drop was unofficially performed by the later RFC pilot Charles Gordon Bell on 27 July 1914 - dropping a Whitehead torpedo from a Short S.64 seaplane. Gordon Bell was followed the next day by RNAS pilot Arthur Longmore, when officially testing an aerial torpedo. The success of these experiments led to the construction of the first purpose-built operational torpedo aircraft, the Short Type 184, built from 1915."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerial_torpedo
lol - sorry - I meant a carrier-capable TB - I should use my words like a big-boy. :D
TTFN,

Mike
User avatar
1EyedJacks
Posts: 2304
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 6:26 am
Location: Reno, NV

Re: A New Set of BTS, RA, and Treaty Mods

Post by 1EyedJacks »

So of those 26 pre-war CLs - could we have a few more that can be upgraded to torpedo broadsides? I just have this dream of 3-6 CL firing massive broadsides of torpedoes... :lol: :lol:
TTFN,

Mike
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18044
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

Re: A New Set of BTS, RA, and Treaty Mods

Post by RangerJoe »

1EyedJacks wrote: Sun Feb 04, 2024 10:41 pm
RangerJoe wrote: Sun Feb 04, 2024 6:22 pm
1EyedJacks wrote: Sun Feb 04, 2024 4:53 pm

Yamamoto was in the US for a bit - what would he have seen realistically? The Hosho was the first actual flat top - right? Yamamoto was in the US in the early 20s, did flight training in 1924 (Japan), and was back in the US from 26-28. America and the British Navy were filling out DB airframes. I'm not sure when the first Torpedo Plane came out - the TBD-1?

Ummmmm . . .

Maybe the first torpedo plane came out before the First World War?

". . . The first successful aerial torpedo drop was unofficially performed by the later RFC pilot Charles Gordon Bell on 27 July 1914 - dropping a Whitehead torpedo from a Short S.64 seaplane. Gordon Bell was followed the next day by RNAS pilot Arthur Longmore, when officially testing an aerial torpedo. The success of these experiments led to the construction of the first purpose-built operational torpedo aircraft, the Short Type 184, built from 1915."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerial_torpedo
lol - sorry - I meant a carrier-capable TB - I should use my words like a big-boy. :D

From a seaplane carrier:
"On 12 August 1915 a Short Type 184, piloted by Flight Commander Charles Edmonds, was the first aircraft in the world to attack an enemy ship with an air-launched torpedo.[18] Operating from HMS Ben-my-Chree in the Aegean Sea, Edmonds took off with a 14-inch-diameter (360 mm), 810-pound (370 kg) torpedo to fly over land[10] and sank a Turkish supply ship in the Sea of Marmara.[5]

Five days later, a Turkish steamship was sunk by a torpedo aimed again by Edmonds. His formation mate, Flight Lieutenant G. B. Dacre, sank a Turkish tugboat after being forced to land on the water with engine trouble. Dacre taxied toward the tugboat, released his torpedo and was then able to take off and return to Ben-My-Chree.[19][20] A limitation to using the Short more widely as a torpedo bomber was that it could only take off carrying a torpedo in conditions of perfect flying weather and calm seas, and, with that load, could only fly for a little more than 45 minutes before running out of fuel. "
"In 1931, the Japanese Navy developed the Type 91 torpedo, intended for a torpedo bomber to drop from a height of 330 feet (100 m) and a speed of 100 knots (190 km/h; 120 mph). . . . "

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerial_torpedo

From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubishi_B1M

"While working with the Mitsubishi company, the British aircraft designer Herbert Smith designed the 2MT1 two-seat biplane torpedo bomber which flew for the first time in January 1923.[1] It went into Japanese Navy service as the Type 13-1 carrier-borne attack aircraft or B1M1, and was followed by the 2MT2 and 2MT3 variants (also designated B1M1). The redesigned Type 13-2 was designated B1M2. The final version, the Type 13-3 or B1M3, had the company designation 3MT2 and was a three-seater. Total production was 443.[1] The B1M was powered by a 450 hp (340 kW) Napier Lion or Hispano-Suiza engine according to version. "


From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_T2D

"The first three T2D-1's were delivered to the torpedo bomber squadron VT-2 on 25 May 1927,[1] being used for successful trials aboard the aircraft carrier Langley. A further nine T2D-1's were ordered in 1927, these normally being operated as floatplanes, partly owing to criticism from the Army of the Navy operating large land-based bombers,[1] and partly as its large size prevented Langley from embarking a full airwing."

So I do believe that Yamamoto would have been familiar with aerial torpedoes and torpedo aircraft, even the World War I float planes dropping them since Japan was an Allied power and active in the Med.
Last edited by RangerJoe on Mon Feb 05, 2024 1:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17538
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

Re: A New Set of BTS, RA, and Treaty Mods

Post by John 3rd »

1EyedJacks wrote: Sun Feb 04, 2024 10:52 pm So of those 26 pre-war CLs - could we have a few more that can be upgraded to torpedo broadsides? I just have this dream of 3-6 CL firing massive broadsides of torpedoes... :lol: :lol:
Just the sort of thing all JFB want!!! :lol:
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18044
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

Re: A New Set of BTS, RA, and Treaty Mods

Post by RangerJoe »

John 3rd wrote: Mon Feb 05, 2024 1:01 am
1EyedJacks wrote: Sun Feb 04, 2024 10:52 pm So of those 26 pre-war CLs - could we have a few more that can be upgraded to torpedo broadsides? I just have this dream of 3-6 CL firing massive broadsides of torpedoes... :lol: :lol:
Just the sort of thing all JFB want!!! :lol:
At range 2K, at night, with little or no moonlight plus a storm, the Japanese trio of CL(TTs) surprise the 6 American carriers operating in a group resulting in all six carriers suffering multiple torpedo hits while Japanese escape unscathed . . .
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17538
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

Re: A New Set of BTS, RA, and Treaty Mods

Post by John 3rd »

COMPLETELY REALISTIC!

BANZAI!
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4016
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

Re: A New Set of BTS, RA, and Treaty Mods

Post by bigred »

RangerJoe wrote: Mon Feb 05, 2024 1:19 am
John 3rd wrote: Mon Feb 05, 2024 1:01 am
1EyedJacks wrote: Sun Feb 04, 2024 10:52 pm So of those 26 pre-war CLs - could we have a few more that can be upgraded to torpedo broadsides? I just have this dream of 3-6 CL firing massive broadsides of torpedoes... :lol: :lol:
Just the sort of thing all JFB want!!! :lol:
At range 2K, at night, with little or no moonlight plus a storm, the Japanese trio of CL(TTs) surprise the 6 American carriers operating in a group resulting in all six carriers suffering multiple torpedo hits while Japanese escape unscathed . . .
You JFB's got too much goodies now. No extra, this is unfair!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
btd64
Posts: 14161
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:48 am
Location: Lancaster, OHIO

Re: A New Set of BTS, RA, and Treaty Mods

Post by btd64 »

bigred wrote: Mon Feb 05, 2024 9:18 pm
RangerJoe wrote: Mon Feb 05, 2024 1:19 am
John 3rd wrote: Mon Feb 05, 2024 1:01 am

Just the sort of thing all JFB want!!! :lol:
At range 2K, at night, with little or no moonlight plus a storm, the Japanese trio of CL(TTs) surprise the 6 American carriers operating in a group resulting in all six carriers suffering multiple torpedo hits while Japanese escape unscathed . . .
You JFB's got too much goodies now. No extra, this is unfair!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You said it bigred. 😁....GP
Intel i7 4.3GHz 10th Gen,16GB Ram,Nvidia GeForce MX330

AKA General Patton

DW2-Alpha/Beta Tester
SCW Manual Lead & Beta Support Team

"Do everything you ask of those you command"....Gen. George S. Patton
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18044
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

Re: A New Set of BTS, RA, and Treaty Mods

Post by RangerJoe »

bigred wrote: Mon Feb 05, 2024 9:18 pm
RangerJoe wrote: Mon Feb 05, 2024 1:19 am
John 3rd wrote: Mon Feb 05, 2024 1:01 am

Just the sort of thing all JFB want!!! :lol:
At range 2K, at night, with little or no moonlight plus a storm, the Japanese trio of CL(TTs) surprise the 6 American carriers operating in a group resulting in all six carriers suffering multiple torpedo hits while Japanese escape unscathed . . .
You JFB's got too much goodies now. No extra, this is unfair!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What? Don't you want the game to be challenging? :lol:
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17538
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

Re: A New Set of BTS, RA, and Treaty Mods

Post by John 3rd »

You boys make me smile! Good to have a Mod Thread running again.
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17538
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

Re: A New Set of BTS, RA, and Treaty Mods

Post by John 3rd »

In the interests of showing FAIRNESS (to the AFB) I thought I would compile a Carrier Aircraft analysis of the changes created within the Mods. One MIGHT NOTE that the Allies come out ahead...
OOB CV.jpg
OOB CV.jpg (95.43 KiB) Viewed 776 times
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18044
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

Re: A New Set of BTS, RA, and Treaty Mods

Post by RangerJoe »

I used to play a RA scenario, version 5 something I think, and I liked to team the Charlotte and the Hermes in the Eastern DEI away from IJ land bases. It worked pretty well.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17538
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

Re: A New Set of BTS, RA, and Treaty Mods

Post by John 3rd »

Those Hybrid CAV/CLV are pretty useful. They don't have a lot of sorties so they are hmmmm...OK for a carrier but not really. They have serious guns for attack or defense but don't have a lot of ammo storage so they can fight but not for long. A real attempt at combining the concepts of cruiser and carrier but it didn't work out very well. They make good CTF escorts contributing CAP and AA while also able to defend if surface ships get into the CTF. WE all KNOW that can never, EVER happen---right??!!

In these Mods I added two more to the Americans allowing Adm Reeves to get a little more say in the argument.

All my information comes from The Hybrid Warship: the Amalgamation of Big Guns and Aircraft by Layman and McLaughlin.

EDIT--That book cost me a small fortune to buy...
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17538
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

Re: A New Set of BTS, RA, and Treaty Mods

Post by John 3rd »

I have spent the afternoon working on BTS--Fleet Faction. This is the old BTS-Heavy Mod. I got into the heads of the Big Guns Faction of the Kaigun and did some serious work.

Ship-Building:
4 Yamato
4 Fuji
2 Shokaku-Class
4 Shokaku Kai-Class
4 Aso Hvy-CVM
6 Tokoro Heavy CL
I switched over six Moon-Class AA DDs to fast, nasty Shimakaze-Class

The original Tokoro design was for a 3x3 6" CL of 8,000T. Since we have the Gun Club influencing things, I have made them repeat Mogami-Class CLs of 5x3 6" of 12,000T. The Mod has the original 4 built, then the Tone and Chikuma follows the same Class, and Japan orders 6 more as war clouds build on the horizon. In some ways this makes sense to me. You already have a tough, rugged design so....WHY CHANGE?? Already know how to build the Class so it would be somewhat shorter time to build and they make excellent all around escorts.

As I was congratulating myself on a decision that made sense, it dawned on me that the conversions of these CLs to CVL would make for larger, better CVLs. HAH! The Air-Minded Admirals strike and get a larger, better CVL.

The original Aso-Class was built on the 8,500T Tokoro and displaced 12,000 T with 36 planes (30 F and 6 Recon). Belt and Deck armor matched the CL and it made a nice companion to the CVs as a CAP Carrier.

The Heavy Aso-Class STARTS at 12,000F and grows to 14,500T with 48 planes (30 F, 12 TB, and 6 Recon). Belt and Deck armor match the CL and it is actually a CVM not a CVL. I did add 3-5 months onto the original conversion time for each carrier of the class since it is converted onto a larger hull.

THOUGHTS???
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4016
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

Re: A New Set of BTS, RA, and Treaty Mods

Post by bigred »

btd64 wrote: Mon Feb 05, 2024 9:45 pm
bigred wrote: Mon Feb 05, 2024 9:18 pm
RangerJoe wrote: Mon Feb 05, 2024 1:19 am

At range 2K, at night, with little or no moonlight plus a storm, the Japanese trio of CL(TTs) surprise the 6 American carriers operating in a group resulting in all six carriers suffering multiple torpedo hits while Japanese escape unscathed . . .
You JFB's got too much goodies now. No extra, this is unfair!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You said it bigred. 😁....GP
For example, this is what happens when Japs get a start of war BB with a speed of 30k. My Pt boats cant maneuver to advantage. My hope is that John has some history somewhere to give those IJN a 30k BB and this is not another JFB wet dream. Those Kowachi BCs are worse w/34k speed. The BCs can run into and out of enemy air cover, make a bombardment, then retreat before the air can attack. They are still bad news in 44.
Attachments
a1a.jpg
a1a.jpg (277.35 KiB) Viewed 722 times
a1a.jpg
a1a.jpg (293.45 KiB) Viewed 724 times
a1a.jpg
a1a.jpg (556.16 KiB) Viewed 727 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17538
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

Re: A New Set of BTS, RA, and Treaty Mods

Post by John 3rd »

The Owari-Class is based on one of the Japanese renderings in the mid-30s when they still were not sure about the Super-Battleships. Not having to expand the shipyards and going with a more conventional size equals shorter production time....

Hiraga would have done this class as well so it is super easy to keep the Yamato-style artwork and look.
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
DOCUP
Posts: 3117
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 7:38 pm

Re: A New Set of BTS, RA, and Treaty Mods

Post by DOCUP »

Glad to see you back at it John.
User avatar
btd64
Posts: 14161
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:48 am
Location: Lancaster, OHIO

Re: A New Set of BTS, RA, and Treaty Mods

Post by btd64 »

DOCUP wrote: Fri Feb 09, 2024 2:42 am Glad to see you back at it John.
Glad to see you back Docup....GP
Intel i7 4.3GHz 10th Gen,16GB Ram,Nvidia GeForce MX330

AKA General Patton

DW2-Alpha/Beta Tester
SCW Manual Lead & Beta Support Team

"Do everything you ask of those you command"....Gen. George S. Patton
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17538
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

Re: A New Set of BTS, RA, and Treaty Mods

Post by John 3rd »

Hey Sir. Really appreciate the comment! Hope you are well.
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
DOCUP
Posts: 3117
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 7:38 pm

Re: A New Set of BTS, RA, and Treaty Mods

Post by DOCUP »

GP: Thanks, I'm still lurking in the shadows. Trying to get back into the game.
Post Reply

Return to “Scenario Design and Modding”