Why no Pourpos Built Kamakise Types? and Units?

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
Brady
Posts: 6084
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 12:48 pm
Location: Oregon,USA

Why no Pourpos Built Kamakise Types? and Units?

Post by Brady »

I read recently on this Board that their are to be no Pourpose built Japanese Kamakise Types, and Units, in the Game, if this is corect Why is this?
Image


SCW Beta Support Team

Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
pad152
Posts: 2835
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2000 8:00 am

RE: Why no Pourpos Built Kamakise Types? and Units?

Post by pad152 »

Kamakise


"Kamikaze" missions, the player has control over which air groups will preform this type of mission. There would be a lot of kicking & screaming on this forum if the player didn't have control of what missions could be flown by newly arrived airgroups.
User avatar
Brady
Posts: 6084
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 12:48 pm
Location: Oregon,USA

RE: Why no Pourpos Built Kamakise Types? and Units?

Post by Brady »

Ya I understand that, but their were Lots of Kamakisie units formed for this express use, with planes expresely built for this mishion, like the Ki 115, and many other convershions, these types had large bombloads, larger than most of the lash up's, and represented a signafagant amount of production.
Image


SCW Beta Support Team

Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
pad152
Posts: 2835
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2000 8:00 am

RE: Why no Pourpos Built Kamakise Types? and Units?

Post by pad152 »

You have control over production (Japanese player), you have control over the mission types (including Kamikaze) used by the air groups. I'm not sure I see the problem here. Look either the player or the computer is in control of airgroups and the missions they preform. Do you really want the computer be in control of all air groups and limit the type of missions they perform?
User avatar
Brady
Posts: 6084
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 12:48 pm
Location: Oregon,USA

RE: Why no Pourpos Built Kamakise Types? and Units?

Post by Brady »

You only have a limited abality to effect what units get what planes, upgrade paths are set in stone, and producing more of a certain type of plane does not mean more units will convert to it. Also As I understand it Their are No pourpos built Kamakise planes in the Game, like the Ki-115 as an example, it is not in the OOB, or this is what I have been lead to beleave. What I want to know is why.
Image


SCW Beta Support Team

Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
User avatar
mogami
Posts: 11053
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2000 8:00 am
Location: You can't get here from there

Ki-115

Post by mogami »

Hi Brady only 105 of these flying dumpsters were produced. It would be madness to build them on purpose in WITP. They would only be of use defending the Home Islands because the groups cannot air transfer and it's doubtfull you could ship any to another base.

The Ki-115 was a purpose-built, cheapie kamikaze aircraft. Designed to do no more than take its pilot and bomb to the target, it was built of non-strategic materials (wood) and had minimal instrumentation. The landing gear was unsprung and designed to fall away after take-off. The pilot and his bomb were then to proceed to the target. Normally those kamikaze pilots who flew standard aircraft were able to return if the target was not found or the weather was poor. How the Ki-115 pilots were supposed to land if conditions for bombing were unfavorable is not totally understood

This gizmo is not going to impact the war.
Image




I'm not retreating, I'm attacking in a different direction!
User avatar
tsimmonds
Posts: 5490
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 2:01 pm
Location: astride Mason and Dixon's Line

RE: Why no Pourpos Built Kamakise Types? and Units?

Post by tsimmonds »

What I want to know is why.

No matter how much detail there will finally be in WitP, they will never be able to fit in every piece of hardware that conceivably might have been used by one or another of the Pacific War combatants. It is clear from other threads that one of the major constraints is the number of slots available for different types of aircraft. One person may see this as regrettable, since it means that not every aircraft that might have flown between 1941 and 1946 will be available; another person may see this as a blessing, since it means that he will not be faced with an overwhelming number of choices. But regardless of whether one sees it as a good thing or a bad one, it seems clear that this limitation is not going to disappear, that for good or ill the game engine incorporates into its design the use of a database that limits the available choices in the way described. Choose your causes with care; I'm afraid most of them are lost before you start.
Fear the kitten!
sven6345789
Posts: 1072
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 12:45 am
Location: Sandviken, Sweden

RE: Ki-115

Post by sven6345789 »

They were not supposed to come back. If you flew on a kamikaze- mission, and survived, you were disgraced.
And we were allied with those guys...
Bougainville, November 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. It rained today.

Letter from a U.S. Marine,November 1943
User avatar
siRkid
Posts: 4177
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Orland FL

RE: Ki-115

Post by siRkid »

Its not clear to me that everyone understands that your can convert some of you air groups into Kamikaze groups under the right conditions. Also, if Japan is invaded militia units will start to appear in large numbers.
Former War in the Pacific Test Team Manager and Beta Tester for War in the East.

Image
User avatar
mogami
Posts: 11053
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2000 8:00 am
Location: You can't get here from there

RE: Ki-115

Post by mogami »

Hi, Do you you do a transfer to a new base? These aircraft are only good for defending the Home Islands (rather unlikely anyone will ever invade Japan it's self)
Image




I'm not retreating, I'm attacking in a different direction!
User avatar
LargeSlowTarget
Posts: 5083
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Hessen, Germany - now living in France

RE: Ki-115

Post by LargeSlowTarget »

ORIGINAL: sven6345789
They were not supposed to come back. If you flew on a kamikaze- mission, and survived, you were disgraced.
And we were allied with those guys...

This last remark sounds rather pejorative, no? Bear in mind that many Kamikaze pilots didn't volunteer but were ordered to fly one-way missions. It's only human that not everybody was ready for this. The Nazi leaders were impressed by the fight-to-the-death tenacity of the Japanese and wished the German soldiers would show the same quality. For example, Nazi Germany not only imported resources from Japan, but also a theater piece called 'The tale of the 47 Ronin', a story about loyalty to the death, in order to 'inspire' the Germans. [8|]

What comes to my mind in this context - someone here familiar the 'Adolf' comics by Walter Moers? "The Japs *grrr*, the Japs - because of a mere atomic bomb or two they throw the towel!" ["De Japse *grrr*, de Japse - wegen ein, zwei läppischen Atombomben schmeißen se das Handtuch!"] The comics are hilarious ('May we make jokes about the Nazis? No - we must!'), don't know whether they have been translated.
User avatar
pasternakski
Posts: 5567
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2002 7:42 pm

RE: Why no Pourpos Built Kamakise Types? and Units?

Post by pasternakski »

ORIGINAL: Brady

I read recently on this Board that their are to be no Pourpose built Japanese Kamakise Types, and Units, in the Game, if this is corect Why is this?

Porpoises didn't have any factories.
Put my faith in the people
And the people let me down.
So, I turned the other way,
And I carry on anyhow.
User avatar
Brady
Posts: 6084
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 12:48 pm
Location: Oregon,USA

RE: Why no Pourpos Built Kamakise Types? and Units?

Post by Brady »

I understand theier were only a hundred or so of them made, but their production was stoped because the war ended, and could of gone on... But I see your point.
Image


SCW Beta Support Team

Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
User avatar
pasternakski
Posts: 5567
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2002 7:42 pm

RE: Why no Pourpos Built Kamakise Types? and Units?

Post by pasternakski »

Does anyone else love this post as much as I do? Brady, my man, you are priceless. As Sherlock Holmes said about Watson, "I never get your depths."
Put my faith in the people
And the people let me down.
So, I turned the other way,
And I carry on anyhow.
User avatar
Raverdave
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Melb. Australia

RE: Why no Pourpos Built Kamakise Types? and Units?

Post by Raverdave »

I always read Brady's posts, it is required reading since Gary Larson retired.[:D]

Brady my man...you just keep posting!


#1 ticket holder of the Brady fanboy club.
Image


Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
User avatar
DoomedMantis
Posts: 1357
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

RE: Why no Pourpos Built Kamakise Types? and Units?

Post by DoomedMantis »

ah but does he do it purpose?
I shall make it a felony to drink small beer.

- Shakespeare
User avatar
jnier
Posts: 292
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2002 10:00 am

RE: Why no Pourpos Built Kamakise Types? and Units?

Post by jnier »

Maybe this has been brought up before, but is the Ohka Bomb (Yokosuka MXY-7) in the game? That was a "purpose built" Kamikaze and hundreds were built. They actually saw action in the Okinawa campaign and did some damage. I cannot see it in any other role besides Kamikaze due to its range.
User avatar
tanjman
Posts: 668
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Griffin, GA

RE: Why no Pourpos Built Kamakise Types? and Units?

Post by tanjman »

ORIGINAL: jnier

Maybe this has been brought up before, but is the Ohka Bomb (Yokosuka MXY-7) in the game? That was a "purpose built" Kamikaze and hundreds were built. They actually saw action in the Okinawa campaign and did some damage. I cannot see it in any other role besides Kamikaze due to its range.

Yes it is, as a weapon not an aircraft type. This is from the WitP Editor post:

The ohka bomb needs to be in slot 197

How you tell your Betty and Francis groups to carry it I don't know. [&:] Testers can you answer this?
Gunner's Mate: A Boatswain's Mate with a hunting license.
sven6345789
Posts: 1072
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 12:45 am
Location: Sandviken, Sweden

RE: Why no Pourpos Built Kamakise Types? and Units?

Post by sven6345789 »

guess it will work the same like in pacwar.
If you have a Betty-group on a specific date, the group will probably will have an additional mission available like "Okha-attack" or the like. This would be like giving the naval attack order, only with an Okha instead of a Torpedo.
Bougainville, November 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. It rained today.

Letter from a U.S. Marine,November 1943
Drongo
Posts: 1391
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2002 1:03 pm
Location: Melb. Oztralia

RE: Why no Pourpos Built Kamakise Types? and Units?

Post by Drongo »

ORIGINAL: sven6345789
guess it will work the same like in pacwar.
If you have a Betty-group on a specific date, the group will probably will have an additional mission available like "Okha-attack" or the like. This would be like giving the naval attack order, only with an Okha instead of a Torpedo.

I haven't seen a full test yet of the Ohka in the game but I'm fairly sure that it is carried only by the aircraft type G4M2e.

When set to Naval Strike, those units equipped with that model of the Betty will use the Ohka instead of a torp (I assume for normal range Naval Strike only).

The G4M2e becomes available for production Oct '44 (possibly earlier if R&D'd). The first unit already equipped with it arrives in Nov '44.

There may also be some availablilty restrictions on the Okha weapon itself but I don't know the details.
Have no fear,
drink more beer.
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”