2028 The Grey War campaign

Post new mods and scenarios here.

Moderator: MOD_Command

Lakeend
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2024 9:35 am

2028 The Grey War campaign

Post by Lakeend »

Hi there. I was told to post scenarios here aswell and not only in Steam, didnt realize there are sizeable portion of players who dont have the Steam version.
Anyway here are the 3 scenarios to a campaign I´m making, hopefully you get something out of them.

I must warn that my scenario style is more of a scripted narrative and not a big sandbox, although I think some bigger and longer scenarios further along the story might be sandboxy too.

Scenarios below are listed in rough order they should be played at, but since this campaign is heavily work in progress I need to add scenarios between them at some point.

Is zipping them all together ok?


Version history:
rel1 : initial release
rel2 : updated "I´m still standing" scenario
rel3 : updated "I´m still standing" scenario
rel4 : updated "I´m still standing" scenario



The Grey War campaign
In 2026, a peace treaty was signed between Moscow and Kyiv, but this didn't signal peace, but instead rearmament. In 2027 with transatlantic relations at their lowest point in decades USA formally withdrew from NATO, with European NATO countries and Canada left in the treaty organization under the same name but very different balance of power.

Now, in the autumn of 2028, both NATO and Russia has been rearming and reinforcing. Canada and European nations have invested heavily on defence and some procurement programs have actually finished on time and few even ahead of schedule. Russia still constrained by sanctions has nevertheless made significant efforts to replace its losses from the war in Ukraine.

Russia is facing mounting internal turmoil with unrest spreading across multiple regions, and the Kremlin faces rising instability at home. Does the Moscow do what they often do in these situations and look for common enemy outside?


Hybrid War -phase


Image

In the sky with diamonds

NATO, now operating without U.S. space capabilities, has spent the past two years racing to rebuild its orbital infrastructure. Europe has poured unprecedented resources into new launch sites, rapid‑deployment boosters, and a surge of small satellites designed to restore the alliance’s strategic reach.

But the space domain is fragile, and the line between peace and conflict is thinner than ever.

This scenario explores the ambiguous frontier of hybrid warfare. How vulnerable is the EU’s rapidly expanding space program? Could deniable actions, covert sabotage, and other grey‑zone tactics cripple NATO’s orbital assets before open fighting even begins?

The question is no longer whether space will be contested — but whether the first shots of the war will be fired in silence, shaping the battlespace far above the Earth.

Outbreak of hostilities -phase


Image

I´m still standing

Finland is to anchor the alliance’s fragile northern flank.

You are placed in command of the Finnish Defence Forces during a period of extreme strategic ambiguity and escalating border tensions. Your orders are clear: enact the high-readiness dispersal plan, OPKOKKO, to ensure the survival of Finland’s most vital air and naval assets.

From the hidden road bases of the interior to the jagged archipelago of the Southwest, you must setup your defensive posture while navigating a treacherous "grey-zone" environment. Every radar contact and unidentified track could be a glitch, a provocation, or the spearhead of a catastrophic escalation.

Success depends on your ability to manage logistics and maintain readiness without crossing the line into open war. As the first reports of unusual activity filter in from the Kola Peninsula and the Baltic Sea, how fast can you react, can Finnish Defence Forces survive until reinforcements arrive?


Image

When the Levee Breaks

The strategic center of the Baltic Sea is under threat! As instability grips the entire region, is the Kremlin mobilizing its Kaliningrad forces and looking to seize the 'unsinkable aircraft carrier' and gain absolute sea denial in the central Baltic?

You are challenged to outthink a relentless opponent in the shallow, closed and complex waters of the Baltic Sea. This is the definitive test of the modernized Swedish Defence Forces, are you ready to hold the line?

This is fairly complex and violent scenario, a lot happens in short time frame. Follow the intel briefs and try to do what they suggest for better chance of succeeding. Gotland can not be allowed to fall.

Prolonged War -phase
Attachments
2028 The Grey War_rel4.zip
(2.56 MiB) Downloaded 46 times
Last edited by Lakeend on Thu Apr 09, 2026 7:48 am, edited 7 times in total.
Knightpawn
Posts: 655
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2024 12:28 pm

Re: 2028 The Grey War campaign

Post by Knightpawn »

Nice Work

1. I have tried the "Gotland Surge" that I understand is a previous edition of the 'When Leeves Break' and I can attest that it was very well designed and captivating. Although the attack was intense, the defenses held if the player followed the suggestions.
2. I have started the Lucy but I am still at the beginning. I definitely contributes to the story. I am not sure I particuarly enjoyed the jumps around the globe thought :-)
3. I am still at the set up phase of 'Still Standing' trying to understand Finish OOB and setting up ferry missions

I like the 'introduction' walkaround as a special action. Before executing it one needs to be mindful that the special action window needs to be at the edge of the screen; otherwise it remains superimposed on the center of the map and the player cannot close it unless he first stops the walkaround. This results in being unable to see on the map the place that is the focus of the walkaround at the time.

I will report back on 2 and 3 and for sure give a fresh go to 'Leeves'
Lakeend
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2024 9:35 am

Re: 2028 The Grey War campaign

Post by Lakeend »

Knightpawn wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2026 9:17 am I will report back on 2 and 3 and for sure give a fresh go to 'Leeves'


Big thanks, really appreciate your effort.
Nikel
Posts: 3216
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:51 am

Re: 2028 The Grey War campaign

Post by Nikel »

Thank you for posting your scenarios also in this forum :D


I have started "I'm still standing", a bit overwhelmed at the beginning, but now I am completely hooked, you can feel the tension as the scenario advances...

Cannot imagine the amount of time and effort it takes to create this scenario.

Still not finished, but congratulations! :)

I am taking notes with some stuff and will report later.
Lakeend
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2024 9:35 am

Re: 2028 The Grey War campaign

Post by Lakeend »

[quote=Nikel post_id=5269556 time=1774355599 user_id=114816

I am taking notes with some stuff and will report later.
[/quote]

No, thank you!

I bet there is lot to improve as its really complicated premise and design, Ive only tested it myself.
Nikel
Posts: 3216
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:51 am

Re: 2028 The Grey War campaign

Post by Nikel »

Sorry, I do not understand :)

So you do not want the scenarios to be tested for you to improve/fix them?
turmoil
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2024 11:06 am

Re: 2028 The Grey War campaign

Post by turmoil »

Nikel wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2026 1:19 pm Sorry, I do not understand :)

So you do not want the scenarios to be tested for you to improve/fix them?
No, just saying "no" in reference to your thank you as they wanted to thank you instead haha
Lakeend
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2024 9:35 am

Re: 2028 The Grey War campaign

Post by Lakeend »

What I (tried to) say is that very much "thank you" for testing :D sorry I was unclear.
Nikel
Posts: 3216
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:51 am

Re: 2028 The Grey War campaign

Post by Nikel »

Lakeend wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2026 2:52 pm What I (tried to) say is that very much "thank you" for testing :D sorry I was unclear.

Perfect :)


What is usually done in this forum is that a scenario is posted, tested and when you are happy with the result, upload the final version in this CSP thread. With the .ini file if you can.

https://forums.matrixgames.com/viewtopi ... 3#p5267043

That if you want the scenario to be included in the CSP, of course.


I have tried the scenario commented (I'm still standing), and apparently I was wrong, because it is the 2nd in the series not the first :?

So, do you want what I have noticed in this thread, and then continue with the rest here? Or is it better to create a different thread for each one?
Lakeend
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2024 9:35 am

Re: 2028 The Grey War campaign

Post by Lakeend »

Nikel wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2026 4:16 pm That if you want the scenario to be included in the CSP, of course.


I have tried the scenario commented (I'm still standing), and apparently I was wrong, because it is the 2nd in the series not the first :?

So, do you want what I have noticed in this thread, and then continue with the rest here? Or is it better to create a different thread for each one?

That if you want the scenario to be included in the CSP, of course.

I have tried the scenario commented (I'm still standing), and apparently I was wrong, because it is the 2nd in the series not the first :?

So, do you want what I have noticed in this thread, and then continue with the rest here? Or is it better to create a different thread for each one?
So let me answer your questions as best I can.

1) I´m not fussed about CSP before I actually finish this campaign and who knows how long it will be. I have quite a lot of ideas and seeing how my scenarios balloon as I go it might take some years :D

2) The Finland and Sweden scenarios (I´m still Standing, When the Levee Breaks) take place the same day and time so its okay to play either one first, BUT I baked in a bit of contuinity between them if you play Finland first. Its not super big deal tho.

3) I am fine with all comments in this thread if people remember to specify which scenario they are talking about. I´m not sure people are happy seeing several threads for my scenarios crowding the place.

Cheers!
Nikel
Posts: 3216
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:51 am

Re: 2028 The Grey War campaign

Post by Nikel »

OK.

I'm still standing v1. Tested in B1825.11


Minor defeat with 44 points.

I lost some points because I sent units by helicopter to ABs, but you need to unload the units in the zones even though the AB is inside the zone. Probably the same reason for not getting points for the sealift arriving to port.

Also the management of the dispersal of the ACs coinciding with the russian attack was not very good :?


Some stuff I noticed for you to consider :)



SPOILERS ALERT


Description:

"military build up in Kaliningrad, where Navy, Baltic Fleet and airforces in Kaliningrad are undergoing maintenance and resupply."

I am not a native speaker, but perhaps should be "military build up in Kaliningrad, where the Russian Army and Air Forces and the Baltic Fleet are undergoing maintenance and resupply."

FARP, it is not said what it means.


Briefing: south of Turku is ALPHA not BRAVO.

Operation KOKKO briefing: where did you get the map? is there a better quality one available?


When you start the scenario this line is already in the scoring log, intended?
10/10/2028 06.00: Score changed from 80 to 40. Reason: Reset score to base level

Urban Jaeger and SPOL/MP units are in an island. They can cross, but the attached ASRAD units have problems following them. Vuosaari port messages appears when the Jaegers arrive, but the ASRAD is not there yet. Perhaps move them inland and nearer their respective destinations?

Add icon for Loviisa nuclear plant, otherwise it will not appear in the OoB and the zone may be difficult to find.

Cannot load all VYKS units into the 3 remaining NH-90 helicopters in the Guards heliport, one more is needed.

All ATU Jaegers cannot be loaded into the 4 helicopters, one more is needed.


Civilian ACs seem to be flying around after the closed airspace message?


SIGINT message seemed confusing to me. What is said are orders or recommendations? I activated KEVA and Giraffe radars, but not sure it was correct.


Dispersal of ACs, you are recommended not more than 4 per base, so just for simplicity, the ACs in the bases should be multiple of x4 per loadout?

Add a list of bases where are the ACs to disperse are located.

There are not dispersing heliport in the North for he helos in Rovanniemi.

When I was dispersing, the attack starts and there are still ACs in the air, that seems to be better used for defense instead of dispersing? Anyway I managed it badly regarding the special actions to active the landed ACs fast.


I lose points per ACs, however destroyed several types of russian ACs and no points assigned. These were the russian losses.


SIDE: Russia
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
2x Il-20M Coot A
1x Il-22PP Coot
2x MiG-31BM Foxhound
2x Radar (48Ya-K1 Podlet)
1x Radar (Rezonans-N OTH)
2x SA-22 Greyhound [96K6 Pantsir-S1, KAMAZ-6560 8x8] TELAR
3x Su-33 Flanker D
5x Su-35S Flanker M
1x Vehicle (1L222 Kvant [Apure/Avtobaza] Mobile Jammer+ELINT)
1x Vehicle (1L267 Moskva-1 Mobile Jammer+ELINT)
1x Vehicle (96L6-VP [Emitter Locator System])


There are a lot of Okhotnik drones, what are they doing, how to destroy them?


As commented the result was a minor defeat, however both success and failure messages were displayed at the end.



1 Lua History error. Attached the full file with many lines in case it is useful.
Exception: [string "CachedChunk"]:26: attempt to index a nil value (field '?')
Stack Trace: at NLua.Lua.ThrowExceptionFromError(Int32 oldTop)
at NLua.Lua.CallFunction(Object function, Object[] args, Type[] returnTypes)
at NLua.LuaFunction.Call(Object[] args)
at VRqmuFv5sZOTBsunPUVr.lPIwZW6Lw0b(Object , Object[] , VRqmuFv5sZOTBsunPUVr )
at Command_Core.LuaUtility.DoString_Optimized(Lua lua, String chunk, String chunkName)
at Command_Core.Lua.LuaSandBox.RunScript(String str, Boolean RunInteractively, String script, String fullPath)





Errors in CMO playing the scenario:

2 closes to desktop.

The fuel bug in the Pohjanmaa class. Fortunately fixed, but we will have to wait for db v517. Perhaps reduce the time needed in BRAVO and ALPHA to get the points.

https://github.com/PygmalionOfCyprus/cm ... ssues/6886

I changed movement to direct (land) and littoral (ship).

Not a bug, but a pity is that you cannot engage the drones with NH90 helicopters.
Attachments
LuaHistory_2026-03-24.txt
(13.49 KiB) Downloaded 12 times
Lakeend
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2024 9:35 am

Re: 2028 The Grey War campaign

Post by Lakeend »

Nikel wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2026 5:44 pm
Just briefly, thanks a lot for extensive report, I´m trying to fix this but the update scenario (on Steam) is broken and I reported it on the tech support forums. This hinders me a bit of updating the scenarios as I would like to keep everything in sync (Steam and this forum) to make it simpler for myself.

If there is no quick fix incoming I just need to bite the bullet and just update the forum side.
Nikel
Posts: 3216
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:51 am

Re: 2028 The Grey War campaign

Post by Nikel »

OK.

I will test I'm still standing until you consider it done.

And then start with one of the other two.
Lakeend
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2024 9:35 am

Re: 2028 The Grey War campaign

Post by Lakeend »

Nikel wrote: Thu Mar 26, 2026 4:17 pm OK.

I will test I'm still standing until you consider it done.

And then start with one of the other two.
It seems they fixed the Steam Workshop upload bug so the "I´m still standing" scenario is updated both here (zip in first post) and Steam.

Here is the changelog:
Changelog "I´m still standing" v1.1

-Added message to deploy the QRF squads on the Helsinki-Vantaa airfield, scoring requires the infrantry unit to be unloaded from the helis.

-Added clarification what FARP (Forward Arming and Refueling Point) means

-Moved Guard Jager Regiment units further inland to stop the game pathfinding breaking

-Clarfified the Description a bit

-Fixed error in Briefing

-Cleared Scoring Log

-Added icon for Loviise Nuclear Plant making it easier to find the target area

-Clarified some messages

-Added 1p reward for killing any RUS AC

-Fixed scenario end messges (both were displayed)

-Lowered the time for FNS Hämeenmaa to be on station to 5mins to get the mission completed.

-Changed navigation modes for ships -> Littoral and Land -> Direct, game has issues with route finding.

-Added "Some parting words" paragraph to Description


And finally, your amazing work testing and reporting deserves answers, so ill write them below with bold.
Nikel wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2026 5:44 pm
I lost some points because I sent units by helicopter to ABs, but you need to unload the units in the zones even though the AB is inside the zone. Probably the same reason for not getting points for the sealift arriving to port.
I clarified this a bit in the orders. Sealiftt tho should just scroe points when it arrives to the target zone.

Also the management of the dispersal of the ACs coinciding with the russian attack was not very good :?
I know it gets hectic, but thats intented :|

SPOILERS ALERT
Description:
"military build up in Kaliningrad, where Navy, Baltic Fleet and airforces in Kaliningrad are undergoing maintenance and resupply."
I am not a native speaker, but perhaps should be "military build up in Kaliningrad, where the Russian Army and Air Forces and the Baltic Fleet are undergoing maintenance and resupply."
Rephrased

FARP, it is not said what it means.
Clarified


Briefing: south of Turku is ALPHA not BRAVO.
Fixed, good spot

Operation KOKKO briefing: where did you get the map? is there a better quality one available?
I made it, dont really have better version, its there more for decoration

When you start the scenario this line is already in the scoring log, intended?
Intended yes, but I cleared the log so there is no further mention of it

Urban Jaeger and SPOL/MP units are in an island. They can cross, but the attached ASRAD units have problems following them. Vuosaari port messages appears when the Jaegers arrive, but the ASRAD is not there yet. Perhaps move them inland and nearer their respective destinations?
I moved their starting places

Add icon for Loviisa nuclear plant, otherwise it will not appear in the OoB and the zone may be difficult to find.
Added

Cannot load all VYKS units into the 3 remaining NH-90 helicopters in the Guards heliport, one more is needed.
This I think is not the case, you can load everything, just load one big squad and one small squad to each heli. You will have 1 heli going to Helsinki center with 3 small units and 3 helis going to airport with remaining units.

All ATU Jaegers cannot be loaded into the 4 helicopters, one more is needed.
This also should work already if you load one big squad and one small squad per heli, just be sure to use the "Troops x20" loadout helis

Civilian ACs seem to be flying around after the closed airspace message?
There might be few like a cesna trying to fly back home and a business jet not taking orders from authorities :) If there are more I guess I can change that bit but for now we can just speculate why there are apparently neutral aicraft in finnish airbase not following orders :geek:

SIGINT message seemed confusing to me. What is said are orders or recommendations? I activated KEVA and Giraffe radars, but not sure it was correct.
Clarified

Dispersal of ACs, you are recommended not more than 4 per base, so just for simplicity, the ACs in the bases should be multiple of x4 per loadout?
Changed it a bit, but cant do multiples of 4 since squadrons have 18 ac.

Add a list of bases where are the ACs to disperse are located.
Added

There are not dispersing heliport in the North for he helos in Rovanniemi.
This I dont understand. Dispersal heliport for what? Helis are supposed to carry the cargo to the dispersal sites?

When I was dispersing, the attack starts and there are still ACs in the air, that seems to be better used for defense instead of dispersing? Anyway I managed it badly regarding the special actions to active the landed ACs fast.
Yeah, this happens, but the orders direct you to make and scramble ACs out from main bases and land them immediately to dispersal locations, 60+ planes are not stopping the barrage thats incoming. After landing you can use the Special action to get them to make quick turnaround and have them ready for further orders.

I lose points per ACs, however destroyed several types of russian ACs and no points assigned. These were the russian losses.
I fixed this by adding points for all destroyed AC. Originally this was intended since you are only supposed to engage order targets (in case of AC its Felons, bombers and Su-34s and not risk the planes for anything else.

There are a lot of Okhotnik drones, what are they doing, how to destroy them?
You cant destroy the drones that are targeting the airfields and other bases, their role is to atrit your air defense missiles for the big hitters (ballistic missiles and planes) to arrive unmolested

As commented the result was a minor defeat, however both success and failure messages were displayed at the end.
Fixes the dual msg

2 closes to desktop.
Is this specifc to my scenario or jus a bug for CMO?

The fuel bug in the Pohjanmaa class. Fortunately fixed, but we will have to wait for db v517. Perhaps reduce the time needed in BRAVO and ALPHA to get the points.
Reduced the time on station to 5mins, this is unfortunate bug indeed, I added a note about it in the Description

I changed movement to direct (land) and littoral (ship).
Made the same change to scenario, hopefully it works better

Not a bug, but a pity is that you cannot engage the drones with NH90 helicopters.
This is true, but you just have to accept you cant stop them, this is sad but realistic.
Lakeend
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2024 9:35 am

Re: 2028 The Grey War campaign

Post by Lakeend »

New version of the rel2-zip released (see the top post), fixes to "Im still standing" scenario.
Nikel
Posts: 3216
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:51 am

Re: 2028 The Grey War campaign

Post by Nikel »

Thanks for the new version :)


I am having problems to finish the scenario due to a bug of the game that causes constant CTDs. Reported in this thread. As you see is a problem of CMO, but for some reason your scenario is more prone to cause it.

https://forums.matrixgames.com/viewtopic.php?t=416561

Also reported what I think it is a bug with the Bolide missiles.

https://forums.matrixgames.com/viewtopic.php?t=416581

The Okhotnik drone cannot be destroyed automatically, but can be done manually, also think is an error in the db reported in this thread for another USA drone.

https://forums.matrixgames.com/viewtopi ... 4#p5271824


My strategy was again a complete failure, I wanted to counterattack with the ACs in the air, but they will land soon enough and that causes too many losses in the ground.

I retried with a save, but then CTD when was dispersing :?

Next time I will follow orders from the beginning, promised :)

You were right with the helicopters transferring troops, there is enough space for them.


Anyway this is what I noticed, mostly typos, note again that I am not a native speaker and could be wrong.



I' still standing v1.1, tested on B1825.15





- Description typos: aswell, excercices, subsufrace, campaing, openess.

Also consider: Finlands, enemys, finnish, helis.


- Briefing typos: Finninsh, Foces. Adapting to?

"HELSINKI TASKING: 7.OhjLv (FNS Pohjanmaa) to proceed best speed to Area ALPHA (south of Turku)". Perhaps best speed should not be recommended due to the fuel bug?


- The log is not cleared when you load the scenario.


- Loviisa NPP icon is green not blue.


- "OPERAATIO KOKKO" background information.

What is the Source of the poem?

Typo: aprox, itO or ITO?


- Special actions typos:

Brieffing (2 times)


- Add names to civilian airports.

- FLASH: SIGINT ALERT

Typo: discrection

This time I activated David slings and all the Giraffes.


- FLASH: "KOKKO PALAA"

Space missing in "Highway FARPs(Forward Arming adn Refueling Point)"


- Emergency scramble message

What is the source of the quote?


- Radar alert detection message: LAVA radars and the Giraffe are the same. This is not explained in the message and may be confusing.


- FLASH: AIR DEFENSE ALERT - INTRUSION DETECTED message

"CROSS-BORDER RESTRICTION: Direct kinetic strikes against "unfriendly" (non-hostile status) assets/units located within Russian territory remain STRICTLY PROHIBITED to prevent unauthorized escalation. Defense must be reactive and localized to domestic territory." However the radars that you have to destroy are in russia.

- Voronezh radars, are not good targets?


- *** FLASH FLASH FLASH *** CRITICAL PRIORITY: OPERATIONAL IMMEDIATE message:

Typo "AN BALLISTIC"


- What is COAST3 event for? It seems to cause problems when you want to destroy the containers. Many lines like these are printed.
COAST3-v05: Checked Strike Hämeenmaa group | Status: Hold
COAST3-v05: Checked Strike Pohjanmaa group | Status: Free
COAST3-v05: Checked Strike Hämeenmaa group | Status: Free
COAST3-v05: Checked Strike Pohjanmaa group | Status: Free
COAST3-v05: Checked Strike Hämeenmaa group | Status: Hold

- Charlie 1 not named, still named container, I think this not happened in v1.0


- "Generic russian AC is destroyed" event is not repeatable.


- This lua error is still happening
Exception: [string "CachedChunk"]:26: attempt to index a nil value (field '?')
Stack Trace: at NLua.Lua.ThrowExceptionFromError(Int32 oldTop)
at NLua.Lua.CallFunction(Object function, Object[] args, Type[] returnTypes)
at NLua.LuaFunction.Call(Object[] args)
at QUnvMRBOeMs49rEJcHOg.FNqJe519Nsq(Object , Object[] , QUnvMRBOeMs49rEJcHOg )
at Command_Core.LuaUtility.DoString_Optimized(Lua lua, String chunk, String chunkName)
at Command_Core.Lua.LuaSandBox.RunScript(String str, Boolean RunInteractively, String script, String fullPath)
Lakeend
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2024 9:35 am

Re: 2028 The Grey War campaign

Post by Lakeend »

Nikel wrote: Wed Apr 08, 2026 11:11 am I am having problems to finish the scenario due to a bug of the game that causes constant CTDs. Reported in this thread
https://forums.matrixgames.com/viewtopic.php?t=416561
Does the CTD only happen with my scenario?? :(

My strategy was again a complete failure, I wanted to counterattack with the ACs in the air, but they will land soon enough and that causes too many losses in the ground.
Well this isnt very easy scenario due to the david vs goliath scale. Make your top prioirity of protecting the aircraft and the ships you have, not the buildings on the ground (Finland cant protect the airfields from the massed salvos but it cant get away from them)

Regarding typos
I´m not native English speaker either, so I should have put it through a spell checker before, now I have, thanks :)

"HELSINKI TASKING: 7.OhjLv (FNS Pohjanmaa) to proceed best speed to Area ALPHA (south of Turku)". Perhaps best speed should not be recommended due to the fuel bug?
Sucks that such a glaring bug has made it so far, but yeah I dropped that part from the order.


- The log is not cleared when you load the scenario.
Fixed

- Loviisa NPP icon is green not blue.
Intended, kinda

- "OPERAATIO KOKKO" background information.

What is the Source of the poem?
Its made up poem on the style of Finnish National epic Kalevala

Typo: aprox, itO or ITO?
Fixed


- Special actions typos:
Brieffing (2 times)
Fixed

- Add names to civilian airports.
Added names

Typo: discrection
Fixed

Space missing in "Highway FARPs(Forward Arming adn Refueling Point)"
Fixed

- Emergency scramble message

What is the source of the quote?
Made up, lake all of them.

- Radar alert detection message: LAVA radars and the Giraffe are the same. This is not explained in the message and may be confusing.
If you press OK to the query they should turn on automatically. But clarified also.

"CROSS-BORDER RESTRICTION: Direct kinetic strikes against "unfriendly" (non-hostile status) assets/units located within Russian territory remain STRICTLY PROHIBITED to prevent unauthorized escalation. Defense must be reactive and localized to domestic territory." However the radars that you have to destroy are in russia.
Well there are new orders later to strike targets in Russia... but I added a bit there specifically saying that old orders are overridden.

- Voronezh radars, are not good targets?
They are but they are highly defended and ment for later :)

Typo "AN BALLISTIC"
Fixed

- What is COAST3 event for? It seems to cause problems when you want to destroy the containers. Many lines like these are printed.
Shouldnt have anything to do with containers, its timer based. However I disabled it as its not really needed in this scenario after all. Its purpose was to mask the ships that are near the coast.

- Charlie 1 not named, still named container, I think this not happened in v1.0
This I dont understand, you need to clarify what you mean. WHats "Charlie 1" and whats named "container"? Sorry I should probably know this but I have several scenarios under development. :)

- "Generic russian AC is destroyed" event is not repeatable.
Embarrassing, fixed now

- This lua error is still happening
Exception: [string "CachedChunk"]:26: attempt to index a nil value (field '?')
Stack Trace: at NLua.Lua.ThrowExceptionFromError(Int32 oldTop)
at NLua.Lua.CallFunction(Object function, Object[] args, Type[] returnTypes)
at NLua.LuaFunction.Call(Object[] args)
at QUnvMRBOeMs49rEJcHOg.FNqJe519Nsq(Object , Object[] , QUnvMRBOeMs49rEJcHOg )
at Command_Core.LuaUtility.DoString_Optimized(Lua lua, String chunk, String chunkName)
at Command_Core.Lua.LuaSandBox.RunScript(String str, Boolean RunInteractively, String script, String fullPath)
Attempted to fix it, hopefully I found the correct function that was the cause of this error.
I must say again BIG thanks for doing this, really helpful! I appreciate all the effort that you put into making on this forum/community better!
Lakeend
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2024 9:35 am

Re: 2028 The Grey War campaign

Post by Lakeend »

New version of the rel3-zip released (see the top post), fixes to "Im still standing" scenario.
Nikel
Posts: 3216
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:51 am

Re: 2028 The Grey War campaign

Post by Nikel »

That was fast, thanks :)


CTDs, not only in your scenario. I also had them in a Knightpawn scenario, when you fight a swarm of drones and FIACs in the strait of Hormuz :)

Again it is not a problem of your scenario but of CMO, in the thread it not explained what is causing it though, I will ask.


Lesson learned, 2 times. I will obey orders regarding the dispersing.


Loviisa NPP, well it is a strategic Finnish asset that you are trying to protect, not civilian. What is the difference with the government buildings?


Charlie1 and 2 are the mothership containers that you have to destroy. I thought the naming was done with the event that orders you to sink them. But perhaps it is done through recon. Also there is a Charlie3 in the North.


C12.gif
C12.gif (293.17 KiB) Viewed 1595 times
Nikel
Posts: 3216
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:51 am

Re: 2028 The Grey War campaign

Post by Nikel »

I' still standing v1.2, tested on B1825.15


This time a Major victory with 97 points. The dispersion indeed works.

No CTDs at all :) Perhaps it is related with the COAST3 event? Any other change that may explain the difference with v1.1?



In this version noticed the following:

- There is a problem now with the pics in the hosting site. May you upload them separately with the scenario?

H.png
H.png (66.81 KiB) Viewed 1529 times

- Also include the pics you use on steam to illustrate the scenarios, they are beautiful. Edit, downloaded in very good resolution from your first post :) But why not to embed them in each scenario?

- Loviisa NPP has a town marker, you may use "Structure, Power Station Nuclear" unit that is more appropriate.

- The consequences of the decision to give F-18s are not explained.

- Dispersal in the South coincides with the russian attack, so instead of landing, the ACs are in engaged defensive. I used them to destroy one of the radars before being ordered to do so :)

- NATO aircraft and F-35 both are counted when a F-35 is destroyed, -5 points instead of -3, intended?

- FLASH: MISSION TASKING - COUNTER-STRIKE ORDER (Air force) message. Typo: space missing in "Vuojärven varalaskupaikka(FARP)".

- *** FLASH FLASH FLASH *** PRIORITY: OPERATIONAL IMMEDIATE // TARGET OF OPPORTUNITY message. Typo: "DEEMEd"

- Is it possible to arm the F-35 given by NATO?

- Enontekion, Kajaanin, Mikkelin (also named Mikkeli), could land ACs in the dispersion. But then they could not take off ("Waiting for runway to become available"), because they were severely damaged.
So the russian side may attack this secondary (provincial) airports? I think it is not what is said in the messages. Only FARPs are safe?

- ATU coastal Jaegers, consider reduction of time needed in the zone to assign points to the player.

- Russian fighters seem to be not very active defending the bombers.

- Scenario ends abruptly by time when there are still MiGs-31BM in the interior of Finland and Okhotniks drones in the South, deactivate earlier their missions?

- Full scoring log attached, is it useful for you?

- The lua error is indeed gone :)

I post this in case it indicates a problem, also appears in the lua history file.

--- STARTING UNIQUE HVT STRIKE SEQUENCE ---
ERROR: Engagement failed for [CWVLA7-0HNKLFDCKEP4T]
ERROR: Engagement failed for [CWVLA7-0HNKLFDCKET3L]
ERROR: Engagement failed for [CWVLA7-0HNKLFDCKEP61]
ERROR: Engagement failed for [CWVLA7-0HNKLFDCKET5V]
--- STRIKE SEQUENCE FINISHED ---
--- STARTING UNIQUE HVT STRIKE SEQUENCE ---
ERROR: Engagement failed for [CWVLA7-0HNKLFDCKEP4T]
ERROR: Engagement failed for [CWVLA7-0HNKLFDCKET3L]
ERROR: Engagement failed for [CWVLA7-0HNKLFDCKI3FK]
ERROR: Engagement failed for [CWVLA7-0HNKLFDCKEP61]
--- STRIKE SEQUENCE FINISHED ---

AS OF: 10-Oct-28 10:30:03

SIDE: NATO
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
5x 23mm ZU-23-2
2x 35mm Twin Oerlikon KDB
2x 70 Rauma [Helsinki II]
6x A/C Hangar (2x Very Large Aircraft)
2x A/C Hangar (4x Medium Aircraft)
2x A/C Hardened Aircraft Shelter (1x Medium Aircraft)
1x AvGas (75k Liter Tank)
8x F/A-18C Hornet [F-18C]
2x F-35A Lightning II
10x FIM-92E Stinger MANPADS
2x NH90 TTT
1x Radar (Giraffe 100 [Målspaningsradar 95])
5x Radar (TRS 2230)
2x RB 70 Bolide ASRAD-R
7x Structure (Pier [Very Large (45.1-200m) x 1])
1x Structure (Pier [Very Large (45.1-200m) x 2])
1x Vehicle (Upgraded Super Fledermaus)


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
4x 25mm GAU-22/A Equalizer Burst [30 rnds]
24x 35mm Twin Oerlikon KDB Burst [20 rnds]
22x AGM-158A JASSM
19x AGM-88G AARGM-ER
52x AIM-120C-7 AMRAAM P3I.3
86x AIM-120D AMRAAM P3I.4
10x AIM-9X Sidewinder
72x AIM-9X-2 Sidewinder Blk II
120x AMRAAM-ER
1x AN/ALE-70(V)/T-1687 Expendable Decoy
2x DUAL TRAP Chaff/Flare
31x FIM-92E Stinger RMP Blk I
6x Gabriel V
1x Generic Chaff Salvo [5x Cartridges]
21x Generic Chaff Salvo [8x Cartridges]
4x Generic Flare Salvo [3x Cartridges, Dual Spectral]
3x Generic Flare Salvo [4x Cartridges, Dual Spectral]
209x MIM-120C-7 NASAMS II [AMRAAM]
4x RB 15M Mk3
5x RB 70 Bolide
80x RB 70 Bolide
2x RIM-116C RAM Blk II
10x RIM-162B ESSM
215x Stunner
9x Umkhonto-IR Mk2



SIDE: Nature
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------



SIDE: Russia
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
16x MiG-29K Fulcrum D
2x MiG-31BM Foxhound
2x Radar (48Ya-K1 Podlet)
1x Radar (Rezonans-N OTH)
1x S-70 Okhotnik-B UCAV
2x Su-33 Flanker D
4x Su-34M Fullback
5x Su-35S Flanker M
6x Tu-22M-3M Backfire C


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
2x 23mm Gsh-6-23 [50 rnds]
2x 30mm 2A38M Burst [50 rnds]
3x AA-10 Alamo A [R-27R, MR TSARH]
2x AA-10 Alamo C [R-27ER, LR TSARH]
5x AA-11 Archer [R-73]
2x AA-11 Archer [R-73M]
34x AA-12 Adder B [R-77-1, RVV-SD]
14x AA-9 Amos B [R-33S, SARH]
52x AS-20 Kayak [Kh-35U Star]
6x AS-22 Kluge [Kh-555, Inert]
12x AS-22 Kluge [Kh-555]
1x Generic Chaff Salvo [5x Cartridges]
10x Generic Chaff Salvo [8x Cartridges]
2x Generic Flare Salvo [3x Cartridges, Single Spectral]
5x Generic Flare Salvo [4x Cartridges, Single Spectral]
102x Kh-50
24x KN-23 [Hwasong 11Ga, 2500kg HE Conventional]
24x KN-23 [Hwasong 11Ga, 2500kg HE Conventional] RV
99x SA-21b Growler [40N6]
16x SA-23a Gladiator [9M83M]
44x SA-28 [9M96D]
12x SS-21a Scarab [9M79K, Unitary]
94x SS-26 Stone [9M723 Iskander-M, 700kg HE Penetrator]
96x SS-26 Stone [9M723 Iskander-M, 700kg HE Penetrator] RV
24x SSC-7 Southpaw [9M728 Iskander-K]
46x SSC-8 Screwdriver [9M729 Iskander-K, 500kg HE Conventional]
48x SS-N-30A Sagaris [3M14 Kalibr]
8x SS-N-33 [3M22 Zircon]
52x UMPK FAB-500M-62 Glide Bomb



SIDE: UNKNOWN1
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
239x Shahed-136



SIDE: UNKNOWN2
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
75x Generic Suicide Drone
125x Shahed-131



SIDE: Neutral
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
1x Commercial Container Vessel - Feeder [1,600 TEU, 20,000t DWT]


EXPENDITURES:
------------------



SIDE: NATO-NPC
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
1x GlobalEye AEW [G6000]


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
2x Generic Chaff Salvo [5x Cartridges]



SIDE: UNKNOWN3
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
2x Commercial Container Vessel - Feeder [1,600 TEU, 20,000t DWT]


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
Attachments
Scoring log Still standing v1.2.txt
(11.19 KiB) Downloaded 11 times
Post Reply

Return to “Mods and Scenarios”