Hierarchy Module Document

[Curtis Lemay]

I finally heard back from MaximKI. I'll text the five new guys the drill to gain access to the site directly.

I've now done so. Each should confirm that they've received a text from me about it.

[Curtis Lemay]

I should add that maximKI has evidently created this TOAW Beta Test sign up site:

https://www.matrixgames.com/beta/the-op ... -of-war-iv

So, perhaps late comers can still opt in to the test via that link.

I can't tell if my text even went out. Regardless, the new five can just go to the link above and follow the instructions. Once done, Max added the following instruction:

"Once they have completed the sign-up process, please ask them to reach out to me and confirm that they have completed the application process. I can approve them afterwards."

Edit: I'm moving this issue out of this thread, since it will get buried in here.

New Thread is here:

https://forums.matrixgames.com/viewtopic.php?t=416803

[Curtis Lemay]

I've finished Additional Features item #21. This gives designers/players the option to toggle between displaying a commander's rank with either text or insignia. Rank text varies depending upon the nationality. It can be confusing due to differing names. Also, with Japanese and Chinese, almost incomprehensible. So, displaying the ranks with insignia (which are universal) seemed needed. I've been working on it for weeks and I've got it as good as I can for now. Unfortunately, I could not apply transparency to the insignia here. Instead they are displayed with a black background. I don't think that too much of a hardship, so I won't waste any more time on this now. I think I could get it perfected, but it would require making masks for each bitmap and that is a bridge too far for now.

[Curtis Lemay]

Here is the Commander List dialog. The ranks are shown in text. Note that the Australian "General" is four stars, while the Austrian "Generals" are three stars. Confusing.

[Curtis Lemay]

Now the ranks are shown with insignia. Clearer. (But note the black background):

[Curtis Lemay]

Here is the Commander Inventory dialog showing text ranks like before:

[Curtis Lemay]

Here is the same but with insignia ranks:

[Curtis Lemay]

Here is the Commander Inventory page 2 with text ranks:

[Curtis Lemay]

And here with insignia:

[Telumar]

(But note the black background):

Actually looks good, even a bit epaulette like.

[Curtis Lemay]

(But note the black background):

Actually looks good, even a bit epaulette like.

Thanks. Now I feel a little better about it.

[Curtis Lemay]

I completed the creation of a variant of my Gettysburg 1863 scenario: "Gettysburg 1863 GotS". This is a variant of Gettysburg 1863 based upon the science fiction novel "Guns of the South": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Guns_of_the_South

In this novel, South African Neo-Nazis time travel back to 1864 to reverse the results of the ACW by gifting the CSA 100,000 AK-47s. It works. The main battle in that novel was The Wilderness. Since I don't have a Wilderness scenario ready, Gettysburg will have to substitute. Quite simply, all CSA small-arms are replaced with AK-47s and away we go. While the Army of the Potomac will still enjoy very good terrain on the defensive and artillery superiority, it probably won't be enough. But, it will be interesting (at least to Southerners).

[Curtis Lemay]

Here are the CSA Inventories before and after the changes.

[Curtis Lemay]

This compares the on-map units before and after the changes. Note that the game is now scaled to the biggest CSA unit and this shrinks the values on the Union units:

[Curtis Lemay]

Here are the equipment reports for the old and new equipment involved. Note the obvious superiority of the new equipment vs. the old:

[Curtis Lemay]

In the Original, the Union's Costner Brigade was the largest unit in the game. It's been shrunk in the Guns of the South version:

[Curtis Lemay]

In contrast, the Stonewall Brigade is the largest unit in the Guns of the South version:

[Curtis Lemay]

The 47th North Carolina Regiment was the featured unit in the Novel. Here it is in the original and in the Guns of the South version:

[Curtis Lemay]

Finally, we have the strength comparision. Note that rearming with AK-47s increases AP by a factor of 6.1 and DF by a factor of 2.4. Add in Artillery and the change is 4.5 and 2.3.

Comparision to USA strengths show the USA originally had an edge of 1.29 and 1.28. But in the Guns of the South version, it is at a 0.29 and 0.55 disadvantage. It can only hope that terrain and artillery can save it.

[Curtis Lemay]

I've been conducting a test of my new Gettysburg 1863 GotS scenario. This scenario, like its historical predicessor, has subordinate regiments inside the brigades/demi-brigades. Thanks to this test, I discovered a bug with the arrival of subordinates as reinforcements. Reinforcements should always arrive in-supply. But, it turns out, subordinates do not. So I had to dig around and fix that issue (bug #34 below). I've now done so.