Back and Better Than Ever Vettim 89(A) vs Greasylake(J)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
vettim89
Posts: 3740
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 11:38 pm
Location: Toledo, Ohio

Re: Back and Better Than Ever Vettim 89(A) vs Greasylake(J)

Post by vettim89 »

CaptBeefheart wrote: Mon Aug 03, 2026 1:49 am Ouch regarding New Caledonia. I feel your pain.

I like to put an AV or AVD or whatever at one of the Channel Islands (off LA) to host a Kingfisher squadron on ASW. With a three hex radius, that covers the LA approaches pretty well.

Regarding the deployment of your AUS and UK divisions, is your opponent known for doing end arounds? You'd hate for them to be hanging in Burma while he lands somewhere in India.

Good luck.

Cheers,
CB
I have a lot of ASW patrol AC near the WCUSA including a LB-30 squadron and Larry has not ventured there. Larry is a what I call a sneaky conservative player. By that I mean he plays pretty close to the vest but will pull a surprise move every now and then. That said, I still own all of the DEI except Miri which I have pounded to irrelevance; so I think any shocking moves in the near term are out of the question I am sending the 7th Aussie DIV to Oz. I am keep the 6th in India for now.
"We have met the enemy and they are ours" - Commodore O.H. Perry
User avatar
vettim89
Posts: 3740
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 11:38 pm
Location: Toledo, Ohio

24 February 1942

Post by vettim89 »

The IJN SCTF has strayed further south an is in the Macassar Strait. I have a small convoy at Balikpapan which is departing. Two SCTF based around CLs (one Dutch, One British) are rushing to cover the convoy. We shall see what happens here. I am sure the Coral Sea romp is satisfying to Larry, but those CVs would probably be of better use here. I have three SCTF in the area: the above mentioned two plus one built around USS Houston south of Ambon

Bombardment attack at Bataan brought a comment from my opponent brought snide comment about future war crimes.
Ground combat at Bataan (78,77)

Japanese Bombardment attack

Attacking force 26254 troops, 380 guns, 135 vehicles, Assault Value = 1643

Defending force 54099 troops, 851 guns, 773 vehicles, Assault Value = 1673

Japanese ground losses:
1859 casualties reported
Squads: 49 destroyed, 75 disabled
Non Combat: 8 destroyed, 6 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 22 (11 destroyed, 11 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
74 casualties reported
Squads: 5 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Vehicles lost 1 (1 destroyed, 0 disabled)
AMPH TF arrives at Pago Pago to pick up teleported units and deliver them to Not-Pago Pago.

IJN remains in force in the Coral Sea. I debated this one. I have some merchies holed up at Brisbane and Sydney. I also have some surface units at Sydney including Canberra in the yard. I thought about forming a SCTF and have them run towards Melbourne at top speed. My fear with that is if Larry pursued I would have a TF out of fuel being chased by 10+ carriers. So I opted to keep them in port and formed some sacrificial TF with xAKL and AMc at each base. There are 50 P-40E with atrocious training at each base. My hope is that Larry will set his bombers on Naval strike as primary and either Port of Airfield attack as secondary. The sacrificial lambs will hopefully keep the nasties away from the bases themselves
Attachments
CVs off Sydney.jpg
CVs off Sydney.jpg (220.58 KiB) Viewed 57 times
"We have met the enemy and they are ours" - Commodore O.H. Perry
User avatar
CaptBeefheart
Posts: 2623
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2003 2:42 am
Location: Seoul, Korea

Re: Back and Better Than Ever Vettim 89(A) vs Greasylake(J)

Post by CaptBeefheart »

Those KB cruises around SE Oz can really increase the pucker factor. At least you have some fighters there. Even with lousy EXP and AIR ratings they should be able to make it a bit painful for the IJN.

Cheers,
CB
Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20691
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

Re: Back and Better Than Ever Vettim 89(A) vs Greasylake(J)

Post by BBfanboy »

Those sacrificial TFs could also burn up KB sorties so it has to RTB. Good move.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 12843
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

Re: Back and Better Than Ever Vettim 89(A) vs Greasylake(J)

Post by Sardaukar »

I had bad experiences with using Suva as stockpile base for fuel from WC/Panama even against AI.

Lost quite a few TK when KB gave a visit (yea, even AI can do that).

Auckland in NZ is way safer bet.
"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
User avatar
vettim89
Posts: 3740
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 11:38 pm
Location: Toledo, Ohio

25 February 1942

Post by vettim89 »

The IJN CVs flee north//NNE. Only a replenishment TF visible in northern Coral Sea. We will continue our vigilance.

Some how SS pollack wandered into a Japanese port, hit a mine, and sank. No longer trusting the AI for sub routing

The IJN SCTF caught up to my convoy and slaughtered them. Then it tangled with Dutch PTs and sank two for good measure. My SCTF did not attempt an intercept. Too far away. Again sloppiness on my part
SCTF vs PT.jpg
SCTF vs PT.jpg (244.77 KiB) Viewed 6 times
Night Time Surface Combat, near Balikpapan at 64,98, Range 12,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
CL Naka
CL Kinu
CL Kuma
DD Natsugumo
DD Murasame
DD Uranami
DD Sagiri

Allied Ships
xAK Taiyuan, Shell hits 2, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
xAK Yu Sang, Shell hits 6, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
xAK Liran, Shell hits 1, Torpedo hits 2, and is sunk
PC Zeeman, Shell hits 13, and is sunk
An I-boat finds CA Cornwell off the SW India coast and puts a torpedo into her. Again a well escorted TF with I think five DDs

IJN ASW TF roughs up an S-boat at Rabaul. I tried to use my opponents tactic of going right into a port hex; oddly didn't work for me. Also hit a mine at Rabaul

Bombardment at Bataan still leaning towards the good guys favor
Ground combat at Bataan (78,77)

Japanese Bombardment attack

Attacking force 15656 troops, 267 guns, 162 vehicles, Assault Value = 1627

Defending force 53975 troops, 849 guns, 772 vehicles, Assault Value = 1670

Japanese ground losses:
156 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 6 disabled
Non Combat: 20 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 45 (31 destroyed, 14 disabled)
Vehicles lost 26 (23 destroyed, 3 disabled)
Units destroyed 1

Allied ground losses:
201 casualties reported
Squads: 12 destroyed, 5 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 2 (1 destroyed, 1 disabled)
"We have met the enemy and they are ours" - Commodore O.H. Perry
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”