New Public Beta - v1128 Live Now!

[Rising-Sun]

I enjoy the new beta patch, but while playing Japan on scenario #003 grand campaign after Pearl was hit. Noticed a couple things that are not fixed. 1) Hatsushimo is misspell and should be Hatsushima (Hatsuharu Class DD) and also noticed that Commander Fuchida, Mitsuo never took part of Pearl Harbor raid and should be under Akagi-3 as torpedo commander.

I will continue playing the campaign vs. AI to see if anything else need to be check.

[RangerJoe]

I enjoy the new beta patch, but while playing Japan on scenario #003 grand campaign after Pearl was hit. Noticed a couple things that are not fixed. 1) Hatsushimo is misspell and should be Hatsushima (Hatsuharu Class DD) and also noticed that Commander Fuchida, Mitsuo never took part of Pearl Harbor raid and should be under Akagi-3 as torpedo commander.

I will continue playing the campaign vs. AI to see if anything else need to be check.

Those should be fixable in the editor. The coding is/was the big issue for me.

[Rising-Sun]

I enjoy the new beta patch, but while playing Japan on scenario #003 grand campaign after Pearl was hit. Noticed a couple things that are not fixed. 1) Hatsushimo is misspell and should be Hatsushima (Hatsuharu Class DD) and also noticed that Commander Fuchida, Mitsuo never took part of Pearl Harbor raid and should be under Akagi-3 as torpedo commander.

I will continue playing the campaign vs. AI to see if anything else need to be check.

Those should be fixable in the editor. The coding is/was the big issue for me.

Well if i knew sooner i would have, but already did alot of progress setting up my first turn. Take time get things in orders, making notes, etc. Changing the commander (Fuchida) is no problem, but i dont think the rename of that vessel will change unless make a new game.

[RangerJoe]

I enjoy the new beta patch, but while playing Japan on scenario #003 grand campaign after Pearl was hit. Noticed a couple things that are not fixed. 1) Hatsushimo is misspell and should be Hatsushima (Hatsuharu Class DD) and also noticed that Commander Fuchida, Mitsuo never took part of Pearl Harbor raid and should be under Akagi-3 as torpedo commander.

I will continue playing the campaign vs. AI to see if anything else need to be check.

Those should be fixable in the editor. The coding is/was the big issue for me.

Well if i knew sooner i would have, but already did alot of progress setting up my first turn. Take time get things in orders, making notes, etc. Changing the commander (Fuchida) is no problem, but i dont think the rename of that vessel will change unless make a new game.

I think that someone knows how to change an existing game but I don't know how to do that.

[Diliwitm]

I just noticed you can now aerial mine ports without existing industry. That is a good change.

[Chris21wen]

....

I think that someone knows how to change an existing game but I don't know how to do that.

All the editor is doing is altering the database and not the the game version. The problem is you cannot save over an official scenario slot. When you alter one you have to save it as new. Any further changes to this new scenario are saved over it. When you consequently reload a saved game that uses that scenario, game starts recognises these changes and gives you a chance to uses them during loading.

Now this is a pure guess. If you manually overwrite the official scenario with the new it might do the same thing??????????

[Diliwitm]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunosaki- ... pport_ship

Sunosaki had 12cm DP guns, the photo is even evidence. In game they have a naval gun.

[nanni]

I'm tempted to download and install Andrew Brown's four new scenarios.
Question 1: is it really necessary to install also his new "standard" map? Reading his web page it appears so, but I'd like a confirmation on this.
Question 2: to install the four scenarios, my hunch is to do so in the game's scenario folder. Once done, you open the game and they'll appear in the scenario list as 101, 102, 103 and 104. Correct?
Question 3: what do I have to do with the new standard map? Install it in the map folder? I believe there is one. But then, when I launch the game, how do I tell it which map to use, when I'm not playing 101...104, but Coral Sea, for instance, or old scenario 1?
Thanks for your help.

[RangerJoe]

I'm tempted to download and install Andrew Brown's four new scenarios.
Question 1: is it really necessary to install also his new "standard" map? Reading his web page it appears so, but I'd like a confirmation on this.
Question 2: to install the four scenarios, my hunch is to do so in the game's scenario folder. Once done, you open the game and they'll appear in the scenario list as 101, 102, 103 and 104. Correct?
Question 3: what do I have to do with the new standard map? Install it in the map folder? I believe there is one. But then, when I launch the game, how do I tell it which map to use, when I'm not playing 101...104, but Coral Sea, for instance, or old scenario 1?
Thanks for your help.

Take the existing maps and put them into a different folder properly named so you can switch maps whenever you want to do so.

[nanni]

Sounds good. Thanks.

[Diliwitm]

First time i have seen after all these years a ship(boat) written off by the game: a significantly damaged subchaser. Wonder if it is a new thing or was already there.

[BBfanboy]

First time i have seen after all these years a ship(boat) written off by the game: a significantly damaged subchaser. Wonder if it is a new thing or was already there.

You have not shown what you are talking about. What do you mean 'written off'. If it was under construction or in repair and had an accident that made it too damaged to repair, that is a rare but normal occurrence in the game.

[Diliwitm]

witpClipboard-1.jpg (23.87 KiB) Viewed 1158 times

Damage due to combat

[btd64]

witpClipboard-1.jpg

Damage due to combat

It happens. That's rare but normal as mentioned by BBfanboy....GP

[Diliwitm]

It is a nice touch, my question was if it was new.

[btd64]

It is a nice touch, my question was if it was new.

Nope, it's been there all along....GP

[Diliwitm]

TY

In the game CVE Kaiyo have only 127mm naval guns, IRL it had the usual 127mm Type 89 DP gun. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_ ... Kaiy%C5%8D

How can an issue like this can occur?

[RangerJoe]

TY

In the game CVE Kaiyo have only 127mm naval guns, IRL it had the usual 127mm Type 89 DP gun. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_ ... Kaiy%C5%8D

How can an issue like this can occur?

Clicking on the wrong gun in the editor. That could be an easy fix . . .

[Cavalry Corp]

Akagi and Kaga both have the wrong 8 inch gun- if it matters( should be the earlier one but in DB that seems incorrect as well as its the same as the type 2 - I corrected it) . One of them has too many as they had a couple removed before PH cant remember which one but I fixed it in my mod. It was verified by the wreck.

I found an error that the Northampton, Portland and Pensacola all have missing tower armour issues for later updates.
The armour values on all the early CA cruisers needs re check - but that's up to you I corrected it as best I could on all the research I did.

Cav

[PharaohVirgoCompy]

Downloading the link just give me a file titled unconfirmed instead of the actual game

Edit, it works now, idk what I did but it works