Question on Ki-84 Production
Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami
Question on Ki-84 Production
Just installed 1.6 and am ready to begin a game in which I really try to "manage" Japanese production. Looking over the aircraft factories the value at Gumma for Ki-84 Frank r&d (think it's 320) really stands out above all others.
If I understand correctly, this seems to represent a major effort to get this Army fighter into production well before the probable mid-1944 date. Question for the veterans:
Is it really worth tying up several years of this amount of r&d/production to gain a couple of months of Franks in '44? I know it's a wicked fighter, but wouldn't several years of production of something else be more realistic, given the probable situation in '44? Compromise?Advice? Anyone been there?
Cheers,
Burkowski
If I understand correctly, this seems to represent a major effort to get this Army fighter into production well before the probable mid-1944 date. Question for the veterans:
Is it really worth tying up several years of this amount of r&d/production to gain a couple of months of Franks in '44? I know it's a wicked fighter, but wouldn't several years of production of something else be more realistic, given the probable situation in '44? Compromise?Advice? Anyone been there?
Cheers,
Burkowski
- Mike Solli
- Posts: 16018
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
- Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
RE: Question on Ki-84 Production
I'm getting ready to restart my 2 PBEM games. I've been thinking about aircraft production a lot lately. What I've been considering is to start plane research 3 months + one day per plane, so it would be about 410 days or 14 months prior to their historical deployment of Dec 44. I'm haven't thought it through though. Any thoughts?

Created by the amazing Dixie
- Mike Solli
- Posts: 16018
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
- Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
RE: Question on Ki-84 Production
I guess I'm wondering if it's reasonable to use the HI and supply that early in the game. It really makes no difference in the long run though, because once it's "repaired", I don't think anything happens until production starts. If you want to produce the Ki-84, keep the factory as is. If not then change it. I'm reluctant to change it because when you change it, production is reduced by about 1/3. That's over 100 planes lost. Granted, the HI hasn't been spent yet, but you do lose supply if you change the factory to something else and then increase the size of the factory.

Created by the amazing Dixie
- doktorblood
- Posts: 561
- Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2003 5:40 am
RE: Question on Ki-84 Production
Nothing wicked about Ki-84 in this game, just another overly crappified Jap plane, but I guess it's better than the rest.
I would leave the Frank factory as it is. You don't really need it to produce something else and it's not goning to grow fast enough to eat many supplies early on. R&D factories don't use any HI or engines.
There are plenty of other factories producing stuff you will never need that you can convert, if you must ... 2 Ki27 factories, 1 A5m4, 1 L1N1, 1 F1m2, 2 Ki51, 1 Ki48, 1 Ki36, 1 Ki54, 1 MC21, E14Y and a couple of extra Jake factories if you need them. That's 12 or more idle factorys you could use without touching any R&D factory.
Personally, I just turn all of these off and only convert a few to begin with.
I would leave the Frank factory as it is. You don't really need it to produce something else and it's not goning to grow fast enough to eat many supplies early on. R&D factories don't use any HI or engines.
There are plenty of other factories producing stuff you will never need that you can convert, if you must ... 2 Ki27 factories, 1 A5m4, 1 L1N1, 1 F1m2, 2 Ki51, 1 Ki48, 1 Ki36, 1 Ki54, 1 MC21, E14Y and a couple of extra Jake factories if you need them. That's 12 or more idle factorys you could use without touching any R&D factory.
Personally, I just turn all of these off and only convert a few to begin with.

- Mike Solli
- Posts: 16018
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
- Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
RE: Question on Ki-84 Production
I didn't know r/d factories didn't use HI or engines. Good to know. Thanks.

Created by the amazing Dixie
- CapAndGown
- Posts: 3078
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2001 10:00 am
- Location: Virginia, USA
RE: Question on Ki-84 Production
I have been considering doing some research as well. Does it work?
Specifically, I am interested in the Shinden. Right now it is scheduled to come out just before Japan's historic capitulation date. Kinda late in the day, ne ces pas? But what if everytime 100 points are accumulated the AI rolls a die? Even if the odds are extremely low the further away you are, the more rolls, the better the chance of moving up production. Anyt thoughts? Specifically, is there some period of time before which no advancement in time will take place no matter what?
Specifically, I am interested in the Shinden. Right now it is scheduled to come out just before Japan's historic capitulation date. Kinda late in the day, ne ces pas? But what if everytime 100 points are accumulated the AI rolls a die? Even if the odds are extremely low the further away you are, the more rolls, the better the chance of moving up production. Anyt thoughts? Specifically, is there some period of time before which no advancement in time will take place no matter what?
- Mike Solli
- Posts: 16018
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
- Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
RE: Question on Ki-84 Production
Ya got me. I haven't a clue. I'm just hoping for the best.

Created by the amazing Dixie
-
- Posts: 600
- Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2000 10:00 am
- Location: Bad Windsheim Germany
RE: Question on Ki-84 Production
In my experience, Japan doesn’t really face a problem of too few aircraft, but too few qualified pilots, especially in 1944. The only time I really experience an airframe shortage is at the start of the game (Zero’s) and when new aircraft become available for deployment. Temporary issues.ORIGINAL: Burkowski
...Is it really worth tying up several years of this amount of r&d/production to gain a couple of months of Franks in '44? I know it's a wicked fighter, but wouldn't several years of production of something else be more realistic, given the probable situation in '44? Compromise?Advice? Anyone been there?...
"If you love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains set lig
RE: Question on Ki-84 Production
Thank you, all, for the feedback... my tendency is to over-manage, even in this monster... there does seem to be consensus, here and in general, that airplane shortage is not the major long-range Japanese problem, so maybe I will just let things be with Ki-84... as noted, there is a lot of other tinkering to be done, both with switching factory products and, now, with changing upgrade paths...
One overall impression I do have, however, is that the variety of the Imperial models should be reduced some, even at the expense of the "brain candy" effect of lots of pretty planes to look at.. seems to me that for transports, for example, it makes a lot more sense to try to pare the numbers down to one or two of the best (range and capacity) and concentrate production/upgrades in that direction... any problem with that approach?
Cheers,
Burkowski
One overall impression I do have, however, is that the variety of the Imperial models should be reduced some, even at the expense of the "brain candy" effect of lots of pretty planes to look at.. seems to me that for transports, for example, it makes a lot more sense to try to pare the numbers down to one or two of the best (range and capacity) and concentrate production/upgrades in that direction... any problem with that approach?
Cheers,
Burkowski
- Rob Brennan UK
- Posts: 3685
- Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 8:36 pm
- Location: London UK
RE: Question on Ki-84 Production
I just had a thought <shock horror> ,, if you say stop hickory production , what about the groups that arrive as new units. if no a/c are in the pool will the computer look for up/dongdrades to get the unit on map or will it sit there froever waiting for a plane that you never produce.
Admittedly reducing the jap transports to tabbys and the converted nells is in theory a great idea.
Admittedly reducing the jap transports to tabbys and the converted nells is in theory a great idea.
sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit 

RE: Question on Ki-84 Production
They just sit there with no planes and no pilots. No great loss. Hickorys are a waste of pilots, IMO. Let them rot.
Fear the kitten!
- doktorblood
- Posts: 561
- Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2003 5:40 am
RE: Question on Ki-84 Production
There is one sentai of 36 Hickory in the que(1-15-43) and starts with 26 Ki-54 in the pool. If you want this unit (which can be upgraded to Topsey), you can either.... build 10 more Ki54 along with 20 Hitachi engines or you can make sure you retain at least 36 Ki59 in the pool by upgrading Theresa squadrons to Topsey. The game should "downgrade" the arriving unit to Ki59 if there aren't enough Ki54. Be aware that there only a total number of 38 Ki59 available, so if you lose more than 2 before you get them back in the pool, the second option won't work.
I just go ahead and build the 10 Hickorys and 20 Hitachi engines before switching the engines to Nakajimas. It takes about the first 5 or 6 days of the war to build the engines and about 9 or 10 days to build the Ki54 pool to 36.
I just go ahead and build the 10 Hickorys and 20 Hitachi engines before switching the engines to Nakajimas. It takes about the first 5 or 6 days of the war to build the engines and about 9 or 10 days to build the Ki54 pool to 36.

RE: Question on Ki-84 Production
Interstingly, afik, their were realy very few Ki-84-Ic's built, Buschell in his book on the Ki-84 lists I beleve a few hundred being built, But a Couple folks I know from another forum who live in Japan have informed me in the past that this model was not realy produced at all in any numbers, Francillion hints at this. So I kinda woundered why the Ki-84-Ic is actualy listed as a Type in Game, it was a subtype and their were a few made, but I am not shure it is worthy of inclushion.

SCW Beta Support Team
Beta Team Member for:
WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE
Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
- Mike Solli
- Posts: 16018
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
- Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
RE: Question on Ki-84 Production
ORIGINAL: Brady
Interstingly, afik, their were realy very few Ki-84-Ic's built, Buschell in his book on the Ki-84 lists I beleve a few hundred being built, But a Couple folks I know from another forum who live in Japan have informed me in the past that this model was not realy produced at all in any numbers, Francillion hints at this. So I kinda woundered why the Ki-84-Ic is actualy listed as a Type in Game, it was a subtype and their were a few made, but I am not shure it is worthy of inclushion.
I'd guess that they are included because the game can potentially go through Mar 46.

Created by the amazing Dixie
RE: Question on Ki-84 Production
You could also ask yourself why the "Kikka" isn't modeled in the game. It was probably just as close to production as the Ki-84-Ic, if not closer...[:D]
I've always wondered why the "Shinden" was modeled, never saw anything stating that it was ready by the wars end.
Edit: I'd guess that "Kikka" isn't modeled due to some idea that Japan was unable to reproduce a jet engine because of it's difficult material shortage or complex design.
I've always wondered why the "Shinden" was modeled, never saw anything stating that it was ready by the wars end.
Edit: I'd guess that "Kikka" isn't modeled due to some idea that Japan was unable to reproduce a jet engine because of it's difficult material shortage or complex design.
Yamato, IMO the best looking Battleship.

"Hey, a packet of googly eyes! I'm so taking these." Hank Venture

"Hey, a packet of googly eyes! I'm so taking these." Hank Venture
RE: Question on Ki-84 Production
Sooo... even with the new "change upgrade path" capabilities, do I understand that an air unit like the transports mentioned above would never enter the game at all? It would just languish in "no plane" land and nothing could be done with it?
Regards,
Burkowski
Regards,
Burkowski