Bill (IJ) vs Ron (Allies): A logistics model study using CHS 1.06

Post descriptions of your brilliant successes and unfortunate demises.

Moderators: wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
Ron Saueracker
Posts: 10967
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece

RE: Bill (IJ) vs Ron (Allies): An examination of Supply and Fuel using CHS 1.06

Post by Ron Saueracker »

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 02/02/42

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Air attack on Bangkok , at 29,39
Allied aircraft
Blenheim I x 8
Allied aircraft losses
Blenheim I: 1 destroyed
Aircraft Attacking:
Blenheim I bombing at 7000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Air attack on Bangkok , at 29,39
Allied aircraft
Wellington III x 4
No Allied losses
Aircraft Attacking:
Wellington III bombing at 12000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Naval bombardment of Rabaul, at 62,90

Japanese Ships
DD Yuzuki
DD Kikuzuki
DD Uzuki
DD Oboro
CA Kako
CA Furutaka
CA Kinugasa
CA Aoba

Allied ground losses:
161 casualties reported
Guns lost 1
Vehicles lost 1
Airbase hits 1
Runway hits 2
Port hits 5
Port fuel hits 2
Port supply hits 3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Naval bombardment of Cagayan, at 43,59

Japanese Ships
DD Wakatake
DD Amagiri
DD Yugiri
DD Ayanami
DD Hatsuyuki
DD Shirakumo
DD Usugumo
DD Shinonome
DD Hagikaze
DD Arashi
CL Kitakami
CL Kinu
CA Kumano
CA Suzuya
CA Mikuma
CA Mogami
CA Chokai
BB Yamashiro
BB Fuso
BB Hyuga
BB Ise

Airbase hits 6
Airbase supply hits 4
Runway hits 59
Port hits 5
Port fuel hits 3
Port supply hits 9
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coastal Guns at Rabaul, 62,90, firing at TF 15
TF 15 troops unloading over beach at Rabaul, 62,90

16 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.
Japanese Ships
DD Kisaragi
Japanese ground losses:
266 casualties reported
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on 4th Division, at 48,39
Allied aircraft
SB-2c x 10
No Allied losses
Aircraft Attacking:
SB-2c bombing at 10000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Shanghai SNLF, at 43,40
Japanese aircraft
Ki-44-IIb Tojo x 3
Allied aircraft
P-40B Tomahawk x 18
SB-2c x 13
Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-44-IIb Tojo: 1 damaged
Allied aircraft losses
P-40B Tomahawk: 1 destroyed
SB-2c: 1 destroyed
Aircraft Attacking:
SB-2c bombing at 10000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Singapore Fortress, at 22,51

Japanese aircraft
A5M4 Claude x 23
G3M Nell x 28
Japanese aircraft losses
G3M Nell: 4 destroyed, 15 damaged
Allied ground losses:
56 casualties reported
Guns lost 2
Aircraft Attacking:
G3M Nell bombing at 10000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on 22nd/C Division, at 49,39
Allied aircraft
IL-4c x 6
No Allied losses
Aircraft Attacking:
IL-4c bombing at 14000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at 48,39

Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 62881 troops, 587 guns, 47 vehicles
Defending force 39272 troops, 135 guns, 0 vehicles
Japanese assault odds: 5 to 1
Japanese ground losses:
1130 casualties reported
Guns lost 13
Allied ground losses:
608 casualties reported
Guns lost 4
Defeated Allied Units Retreating!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Cagayan

Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 37075 troops, 203 guns, 24 vehicles
Defending force 7736 troops, 40 guns, 0 vehicles
Japanese assault odds: 13 to 1 (fort level 0)
Japanese forces CAPTURE Cagayan base !!!
Japanese ground losses:
357 casualties reported
Guns lost 5
Allied ground losses:
12438 casualties reported
Guns lost 23
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Rabaul

Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 12183 troops, 39 guns, 0 vehicles
Defending force 3082 troops, 21 guns, 0 vehicles
Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1 (fort level 2)
Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 1
Japanese ground losses:
109 casualties reported
Guns lost 2
Allied ground losses:
67 casualties reported
Guns lost 3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Singapore

Japanese Shock attack
Attacking force 83857 troops, 647 guns, 14 vehicles
Defending force 55392 troops, 285 guns, 11 vehicles
Japanese assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 6)
Japanese ground losses:
863 casualties reported
Guns lost 11
Allied ground losses:
143 casualties reported
Guns lost 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Naga

Japanese Bombardment attack
Attacking force 1032 troops, 24 guns, 0 vehicles
Defending force 25770 troops, 159 guns, 0 vehicles
Allied ground losses:
11 casualties reported
Guns lost 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Wuchow

Allied Bombardment attack
Attacking force 40730 troops, 263 guns, 0 vehicles
Defending force 47896 troops, 389 guns, 42 vehicles
Japanese ground losses:
264 casualties reported
Guns lost 7
Vehicles lost 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at 43,40

Allied Deliberate attack
Attacking force 26208 troops, 130 guns, 0 vehicles
Defending force 41526 troops, 382 guns, 17 vehicles
Allied assault odds: 0 to 1
Japanese ground losses:
132 casualties reported
Guns lost 4
Allied ground losses:
1580 casualties reported
Guns lost 30
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Rabaul

Allied Bombardment attack
Attacking force 792 troops, 6 guns, 0 vehicles
Defending force 14153 troops, 49 guns, 0 vehicles
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at 49,39

Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 8142 troops, 74 guns, 2 vehicles
Defending force 465 troops, 2 guns, 0 vehicles
Japanese assault odds: 79 to 1
Allied ground losses:
19 casualties reported
Guns lost 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at 51,38 Chinese Guerillas

Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 8218 troops, 76 guns, 8 vehicles
Defending force 338 troops, 3 guns, 0 vehicles
Japanese assault odds: 151 to 1
Japanese ground losses:
25 casualties reported
Allied ground losses:
295 casualties reported
Guns lost 3


Image
Attachments
HMCS Prince Robert.jpg
HMCS Prince Robert.jpg (62.99 KiB) Viewed 885 times
Image

Image

Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan
User avatar
Ron Saueracker
Posts: 10967
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece

RE: Bill (IJ) vs Ron (Allies): An examination of Supply and Fuel using CHS 1.06

Post by Ron Saueracker »

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 02/03/42

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Air attack on Bangkok , at 29,39


Allied aircraft
Blenheim I x 3
Allied aircraft losses
Blenheim I: 3 damaged
Aircraft Attacking:
Blenheim I bombing at 6000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Air attack on Bangkok , at 29,39

Allied aircraft
Wellington III x 7
Allied aircraft losses
Wellington III: 2 damaged
Aircraft Attacking:
Wellington III bombing at 12000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on 4th Division, at 48,39

Allied aircraft
SB-2c x 9
Allied aircraft losses
SB-2c: 1 damaged
Japanese ground losses:
11 casualties reported
Aircraft Attacking:
SB-2c bombing at 10000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on 19th Mixed Brigade, at 43,40

Allied aircraft
SB-2c x 3
No Allied losses
Aircraft Attacking:
SB-2c bombing at 10000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Shanghai SNLF, at 43,40

Allied aircraft
P-40B Tomahawk x 2
SB-2c x 4
No Allied losses
Aircraft Attacking:
SB-2c bombing at 10000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on 38th Division, at 43,40

Allied aircraft
P-40B Tomahawk x 15
SB-2c x 8
No Allied losses
Aircraft Attacking:
SB-2c bombing at 10000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Singapore Fortress, at 22,51

Japanese aircraft
A5M4 Claude x 26
G3M Nell x 32
Japanese aircraft losses
G3M Nell: 3 destroyed, 26 damaged
Allied ground losses:
7 casualties reported
Aircraft Attacking:
G3M Nell bombing at 10000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Singapore Fortress, at 22,51

Japanese aircraft
Ki-21-II Sally x 12
Ki-48-I Lily x 6
Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-21-II Sally: 6 damaged
Ki-48-I Lily: 1 destroyed
Allied ground losses:
40 casualties reported
Guns lost 1
Aircraft Attacking:
Ki-21-II Sally bombing at 15000 feet
Ki-48-I Lily bombing at 15000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on 26th PS Cavalry Regiment, at 43,51

Japanese aircraft
G4M1 Betty x 18
Ki-27 Nate x 33
Ki-21-II Sally x 27
Ki-48-I Lily x 18
Ki-49 Helen x 23
No Japanese losses
Allied ground losses:
59 casualties reported
Guns lost 2
Aircraft Attacking:
Ki-48-I Lily bombing at 15000 feet
Ki-21-II Sally bombing at 15000 feet
Ki-49 Helen bombing at 15000 feet
G4M1 Betty bombing at 15000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on 22nd/C Division, at 49,39

Allied aircraft
IL-4c x 7
No Allied losses
Japanese ground losses:
26 casualties reported
Vehicles lost 1
Aircraft Attacking:
IL-4c bombing at 14000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASW attack at 35,52

Japanese Ships
DD Mikazuki
DD Suzukaze
DD Shigure
DD Natsushio
CA Haguro
CVE Taiyo

Allied Ships Got spotted by the escorts...no shot.[:(]SS S-36
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Rabaul

Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 12225 troops, 39 guns, 0 vehicles
Defending force 2956 troops, 18 guns, 0 vehicles
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 1)
Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0
Japanese ground losses:
166 casualties reported
Guns lost 5
Allied ground losses:
45 casualties reported
Guns lost 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Singapore

Japanese Bombardment attack
Attacking force 86454 troops, 643 guns, 15 vehicles
Defending force 56089 troops, 292 guns, 11 vehicles
Allied ground losses:
93 casualties reported
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Naga

Japanese Bombardment attack
Attacking force 1052 troops, 24 guns, 0 vehicles
Defending force 25904 troops, 165 guns, 0 vehicles
Allied ground losses:
28 casualties reported
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Wuchow

Allied Bombardment attack
Attacking force 40921 troops, 262 guns, 0 vehicles
Defending force 47772 troops, 381 guns, 42 vehicles
Japanese ground losses:
253 casualties reported
Guns lost 5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Rabaul

Allied Bombardment attack
Attacking force 698 troops, 3 guns, 0 vehicles
Defending force 14103 troops, 48 guns, 0 vehicles
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at 49,39

Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 8105 troops, 74 guns, 1 vehicles
Defending force 424 troops, 1 guns, 0 vehicles
Japanese assault odds: 12 to 1
Japanese ground losses:
40 casualties reported
Guns lost 3
Allied ground losses:
17 casualties reported




One of the numerous CS convoys supplying the logistical hub at Panama. The smaller and older merchant classes Don Bowen so thoroughly researched are not "front line" ships and are best suited to these backwater routes. Bill has been poking around with some I-boats lately so some escort is not just routine but necessary. Small escorts like CGC Nemaha are ideal for this.

Image
Attachments
CS Panama.jpg
CS Panama.jpg (59.81 KiB) Viewed 885 times
Image

Image

Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan
User avatar
Ron Saueracker
Posts: 10967
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece

RE: Bill (IJ) vs Ron (Allies): An examination of Supply and Fuel using CHS 1.06

Post by Ron Saueracker »

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 02/04/42

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Air attack on Bangkok , at 29,39

Allied aircraft
Blenheim I x 9
Allied aircraft losses
Blenheim I: 1 damaged
Aircraft Attacking:
Blenheim I bombing at 6000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Air attack on Bangkok , at 29,39

Allied aircraft
Wellington III x 4
Allied aircraft losses
Wellington III: 1 damaged
Aircraft Attacking:
Wellington III bombing at 12000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on 19th Mixed Brigade, at 43,40

Allied aircraft
SB-2c x 6
No Allied losses
Aircraft Attacking:
SB-2c bombing at 10000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on 2nd NLF , at 43,40

Allied aircraft
P-40B Tomahawk x 15
SB-2c x 8
No Allied losses
Japanese ground losses:
32 casualties reported
Guns lost 1
Aircraft Attacking:
SB-2c bombing at 10000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Singapore Fortress, at 22,51

Japanese aircraft
A5M4 Claude x 22
G3M Nell x 20

Japanese aircraft losses
G3M Nell: 2 destroyed, 16 damaged
Allied ground losses:
76 casualties reported
Guns lost 3
Aircraft Attacking:
G3M Nell bombing at 10000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Singapore Fortress, at 22,51
Japanese aircraft
Ki-21-II Sally x 15
Ki-48-I Lily x 9
Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-21-II Sally: 8 damaged
Ki-48-I Lily: 1 destroyed, 5 damaged
Allied ground losses:
33 casualties reported
Guns lost 1
Aircraft Attacking:
Ki-21-II Sally bombing at 15000 feet
Ki-48-I Lily bombing at 15000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on 26th PS Cavalry Regiment, at 43,51

Japanese aircraft
G4M1 Betty x 25
Ki-21-II Sally x 25
Ki-48-I Lily x 22
Ki-49 Helen x 23
No Japanese losses
Allied ground losses:
122 casualties reported
Guns lost 2
Vehicles lost 1
Aircraft Attacking:
Ki-48-I Lily bombing at 15000 feet
Ki-21-II Sally bombing at 15000 feet
Ki-49 Helen bombing at 15000 feet
G4M1 Betty bombing at 15000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on 22nd/C Division, at 49,39

Allied aircraft
IL-4c x 3
No Allied losses
Japanese ground losses:
10 casualties reported
Guns lost 1
Aircraft Attacking:
IL-4c bombing at 14000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Naga

Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 52714 troops, 160 guns, 82 vehicles
Defending force 25967 troops, 171 guns, 0 vehicles
Japanese assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 0)
Japanese ground losses:
1580 casualties reported
Guns lost 13
Vehicles lost 2
Allied ground losses:
1891 casualties reported
Guns lost 57
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Rabaul

Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 12202 troops, 39 guns, 0 vehicles
Defending force 2703 troops, 13 guns, 0 vehicles
Japanese assault odds: 3 to 1 (fort level 0)
Japanese forces CAPTURE Rabaul base !!!
Japanese ground losses:
265 casualties reported
Guns lost 4
Allied ground losses:
3615 casualties reported
Guns lost 11
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Singapore

Japanese Bombardment attack
Attacking force 85518 troops, 648 guns, 15 vehicles
Defending force 56437 troops, 292 guns, 12 vehicles
Allied ground losses:
230 casualties reported
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Victoria Point
Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 1616 troops, 0 guns, 55 vehicles
Defending force 0 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles
Japanese assault odds: 46 to 1 (fort level 3)
Japanese forces CAPTURE Victoria Point base !!!
Allied ground losses:
6 casualties reported
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Wuchow

Allied Bombardment attack
Attacking force 40976 troops, 263 guns, 0 vehicles
Defending force 47551 troops, 374 guns, 41 vehicles
Japanese ground losses:
156 casualties reported
Guns lost 2
Vehicles lost 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Singapore

Allied Bombardment attack
Attacking force 29161 troops, 231 guns, 0 vehicles
Defending force 101357 troops, 650 guns, 90 vehicles
Japanese ground losses:
130 casualties reported
Guns lost 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Naga

Allied Bombardment attack
Attacking force 18358 troops, 104 guns, 0 vehicles
Defending force 50632 troops, 137 guns, 80 vehicles
Japanese ground losses:
9 casualties reported
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at 49,39

Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 8005 troops, 68 guns, 1 vehicles
Defending force 383 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles
Japanese assault odds: 13 to 1
Japanese ground losses:
12 casualties reported
Allied ground losses:
27 casualties reported






Image
Attachments
CGCs.jpg
CGCs.jpg (80.28 KiB) Viewed 885 times
Image

Image

Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan
User avatar
Ron Saueracker
Posts: 10967
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece

RE: Bill (IJ) vs Ron (Allies): An examination of Supply and Fuel using CHS 1.06

Post by Ron Saueracker »

Rant mode ON...[;)]

The Operations report for Feb 4 42

OPERATIONAL REPORT FOR 02/04/42

E8N Dave reports suspected submarine at 59,45
E7K2 Alf reports suspected submarine at 60,43
E7K2 Alf reports suspected submarine at 60,43
E13A1 Jake reports suspected submarine at 60,43
E7K2 Alf reports suspected submarine at 60,43
E13A1 Jake reports suspected submarine at 33,56
E13A1 Jake sighting report: 8 Allied ships at 34,60 , Speed 13 , Moving West
E14Y1 Glen sighting report: 1 Allied ship at 54,94 , Speed 4 , Moving Southwest
Sighting report: 3 Japanese ships at 62,90 , Speed 6 , Moving Northwest
B-17D Fortress sighting report: 3 Japanese ships at 45,48 , Speed 6 , Moving Southwest
B-17D Fortress sighting report: 7 Japanese ships at 40,56 , Speed 18 , Moving East
B-17D Fortress sighting report: 1 Japanese ship at 45,48 , Speed 8 , Moving Southwest
B-17D Fortress has spotted Boston Maru at 45,48
Boston Maru is reported HIT
B-17D Fortress sighting report: 1 Japanese ship at 43,59 , Speed 8 , Moving Southwest
B-17D Fortress sighting report: 10 Japanese ships at 45,50 , Speed 10 , Moving West
B-17D Fortress sighting report: 4 Japanese ships at 45,48 , Speed 6 , Moving Southwest
B-17D Fortress sighting report: 10 Japanese ships at 43,59 , Speed 2 , Moving Southwest
B-17D Fortress has spotted Shiratsuyu at 43,59
B-17D Fortress sighting report: 2 Japanese ships at 45,48 , Speed 6 , Moving Southwest
B-17D Fortress sighting report: 9 Japanese ships at 45,53 , Speed 6 , Moving West
B-17D Fortress sighting report: 1 Japanese ship at 43,41 , Speed 4 , Moving East
B-17D Fortress sighting report: 3 Japanese ships at 41,52 , Speed 16 , Moving East
B-17D Fortress sighting report: 5 Japanese ships at 47,44 , Speed 15 , Moving Northeast
B-17D Fortress has spotted Taiyo at 40,56
B-17D Fortress has spotted Igasa Maru at 43,59
Igasa Maru is reported HIT
Ki-15 Babs takes recon photos of Honan
Ki-15 Babs takes recon photos of Rangoon
Ki-46-II Dinah takes recon photos of Balikpapan
C5M Babs takes recon photos of Naga
C5M Babs takes recon photos of Bataan
Ki-46-II Dinah takes recon photos of Lamon Bay
B-17D Fortress takes recon photos of Johnston Island
Lysander I takes recon photos of 1st Tank Regiment
Ki-15 Babs takes recon photos of 14th Art Regt Field Artillery Regiment
Ki-15 Babs takes recon photos of 14th Art Regt Field Artillery Regiment
Ki-15 Babs takes recon photos of 14th Art Regt Field Artillery Regiment
E8N Dave reports suspected submarine at 60,43
E8N Dave reports suspected submarine at 60,43
F1M2 Pete reports suspected submarine at 60,43
H6K4 Mavis reports suspected submarine at 59,45
H6K4 Mavis reports suspected submarine at 60,43
H6K4 Mavis reports suspected submarine at 59,45
E13A1 Jake reports suspected submarine at 60,43
E13A1 Jake reports suspected submarine at 57,45
E14Y1 Glen sighting report: 5 Allied ships at 54,93 , Speed 7 , Moving Northeast
E14Y1 Glen sighting report: 1 Allied ship at 48,102 , Speed 7 , Moving Southwest
E14Y1 Glen sighting report: 1 Allied ship at 27,74 , Speed 11 , Moving Southeast
B-17D Fortress sighting report: 9 Japanese ships at 40,45 , Speed 7 , Moving West
B-17D Fortress has spotted San Diego Maru at 45,48
B-17D Fortress sighting report: 1 Japanese ship at 47,50 , Speed 3 , Moving Southwest
B-17D Fortress has spotted Turuga Maru at 45,48
B-17D Fortress has spotted Yugure at 43,59
B-17D Fortress has spotted Tazima Maru at 45,48
B-17D Fortress sighting report: 4 Japanese ships at 42,43 , Speed 10 , Moving East
B-17D Fortress has spotted Arizona Maru at 47,50
B-17D Fortress has spotted Kyoko Maru at 45,48
Hudson I sighting report: 1 Japanese ship at 48,105 , Speed 2 , Moving West
Ki-15 Babs takes recon photos of Changsha
Ki-15 Babs takes recon photos of Changsha
Ki-15 Babs takes recon photos of Changsha
Ki-15 Babs takes recon photos of Honan
Ki-15 Babs takes recon photos of Rangoon
Ki-46-II Dinah takes recon photos of Balikpapan
C5M Babs takes recon photos of Naga
C5M Babs takes recon photos of Bataan
Ki-46-II Dinah takes recon photos of Lamon Bay
B-17D Fortress takes recon photos of Johnston Island
Lysander I takes recon photos of 1st Tank Regiment
Geraldton expands airfield to size 2
Port Kembla expands airfield to size 4
Mukden expands airfield to size 7
Kaifeng expands airfield to size 6
Changsha expands airfield to size 5
Chungking expands airfield to size 6


The weather is "Thunderstorms" in the Japan zone yet the ASW AIR SEARCH picks up 5 of the 6 subs I have in the entire area! Please fix. It would be a shame if the excellent job done on the surface ASW was diminished by this air ASW issue. Is it possible to just lower the base Detection Level of subs drastically or is it already at the lowest? [:)]



Image

Rant Mode OFF.[:)]
Attachments
Barracudas.jpg
Barracudas.jpg (55.71 KiB) Viewed 885 times
Image

Image

Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan
User avatar
Ron Saueracker
Posts: 10967
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece

RE: Bill (IJ) vs Ron (Allies): An examination of Supply and Fuel using CHS 1.06

Post by Ron Saueracker »

This is going to sound weird but the sync problems we experience in PBEMs are becoming less of a problem for me as the results only skew the Allied report and are relatively few and far between...maybe 1 in 10. Also, the results are only different regarding a portion of the replay (don't know why but just running one game seems to have minimized the scope and frequency of it). End result? I've found that it actually ADDS to my enjoyment of the PBEM because of the added FOW. One just has to make sure to check the Japanese report any nice opponent will send with the turn after each replay.
Image

Image

Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan
User avatar
ADM Halsey
Posts: 354
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:57 am
Location: Ohio

RE: Bill (IJ) vs Ron (Allies): An examination of Supply and Fuel using CHS 1.06

Post by ADM Halsey »

Now that you have just a few posts to the AAR I guess I should post something. [&o]

I will post after I get the next turn form you.
USS Enterprise The Big-E Haul a## with Halsey
Image
User avatar
ADM Halsey
Posts: 354
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:57 am
Location: Ohio

RE: Bill (IJ) vs Ron (Allies): An examination of Supply and Fuel using CHS 1.06

Post by ADM Halsey »

A little back ground info: [:D]

As you can tell by the name I started this game out as allies. I have been a gamer for about 27 years now. My first game was Midway by Avalon Hill. I have played World in Flames mostly as axis and have taken North Africa with the Italians on a 1:2 odds attack.[:D] Can not wait for that game to come out.

I love this game since I have 7 different games going at the moment. 5 as Japan and 2 as Allies. The information I will be posting will be from the turn 02/05/42.



Image
Attachments
Battleship..12741.gif
Battleship..12741.gif (16.41 KiB) Viewed 885 times
USS Enterprise The Big-E Haul a## with Halsey
Image
User avatar
Ron Saueracker
Posts: 10967
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece

RE: Bill (IJ) vs Ron (Allies): An examination of Supply and Fuel using CHS 1.06

Post by Ron Saueracker »

Since this is a supply oriented AAR, I'm going to post a series of screeies of Port Moresby and Buna. This is unfortunate as I had thought this was addressed in a patch a long time ago...apparently not and it is an annoying design feature.

Take note of the supply states for each base...the first two are from a single turn, and the next two are from the immediate turn following .

Image

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 02/05/42

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on 19th Mixed Brigade, at 43,40


Allied aircraft
P-40B Tomahawk x 13
SB-2c x 14
No Allied losses
Japanese ground losses:
10 casualties reported
Aircraft Attacking:
SB-2c bombing at 10000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on 27th Brigade AIF , at 22,51

Japanese aircraft
Ki-21-II Sally x 15
Ki-48-I Lily x 6
Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-21-II Sally: 6 damaged
Ki-48-I Lily: 4 damaged
Allied ground losses:
23 casualties reported
Guns lost 1
Aircraft Attacking:
Ki-21-II Sally bombing at 15000 feet
Ki-48-I Lily bombing at 15000 feet

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on 22nd/C Division, at 49,39


Allied aircraft
IL-4c x 5
No Allied losses
Aircraft Attacking:
IL-4c bombing at 14000 feet

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Singapore

Japanese Shock attack
Attacking force 87053 troops, 679 guns, 14 vehicles
Defending force 56683 troops, 298 guns, 12 vehicles
Japanese assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 6)
Japanese ground losses:
279 casualties reported
Guns lost 15
Vehicles lost 1
Allied ground losses:
158 casualties reported

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at 43,40

Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 14896 troops, 103 guns, 0 vehicles
Defending force 24040 troops, 69 guns, 0 vehicles
Japanese assault odds: 0 to 1
Japanese ground losses:
357 casualties reported
Guns lost 8
Allied ground losses:
75 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at 52,30

Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 13117 troops, 109 guns, 0 vehicles
Defending force 423 troops, 2 guns, 0 vehicles
Japanese assault odds: 129 to 1
Allied ground losses:
497 casualties reported
Guns lost 2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Naga

Japanese Bombardment attack
Attacking force 1052 troops, 24 guns, 0 vehicles
Defending force 20965 troops, 110 guns, 0 vehicles
Allied ground losses:
32 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Wuchow

Allied Bombardment attack
Attacking force 41227 troops, 262 guns, 0 vehicles
Defending force 47406 troops, 370 guns, 41 vehicles
Japanese ground losses:
104 casualties reported
Guns lost 3

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Singapore

Allied Bombardment attack
Attacking force 29460 troops, 236 guns, 0 vehicles
Defending force 101094 troops, 660 guns, 87 vehicles

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Naga

Allied Bombardment attack
Attacking force 1417 troops, 20 guns, 0 vehicles
Defending force 50963 troops, 140 guns, 80 vehicles
Japanese ground losses:
35 casualties reported

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at 49,39

Japanese Shock attack
Attacking force 8037 troops, 70 guns, 1 vehicles
Defending force 341 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles
Japanese assault odds: 152 to 1
Allied ground losses:
458 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

Attachments
PM Supply.jpg
PM Supply.jpg (22.09 KiB) Viewed 886 times
Image

Image

Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan
User avatar
Rob Brennan UK
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: London UK

RE: Bill (IJ) vs Ron (Allies): An examination of Supply and Fuel using CHS 1.06

Post by Rob Brennan UK »

[font="Times New Roman"]As you can tell by the name I started this game out as allies. I have been a gamer for about 27 years now. My first game was Midway by Avalon Hill. I have played World in Flames mostly as axis and have taken North Africa with the Italians on a 1:2 odds attack. Can not wait for that game to come out.
[/font]

Same here ! .. although the 1-2 north africa attack ( cairo? ) .. was a bit lucky .. imagine the weeping and gnashing of teeth if that happened in witp [;)].. and the 'its all wrong' crowd getting hung up on one lucky attack [;)].

got to say if they do a good job on WIF .. i maight have to stop playing this game .. maybe .. just maybe [;)]
sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)
User avatar
Ron Saueracker
Posts: 10967
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece

RE: Bill (IJ) vs Ron (Allies): An examination of Supply and Fuel using CHS 1.06

Post by Ron Saueracker »

Also note that there are absolutely NO LCUs at Buna.

Image

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 02/06/42

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sub attack at 47,46
Japanese Ships
AK Matue Maru, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
Allied Ships
SS Seal

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASW attack at 47,46
Japanese Ships
PC Ch 13
PC Ch 11
Allied Ships
SS Seal

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sub attack at 24,58
Japanese Ships
SS I-165
Allied Ships
LCVP LCP(L) No. 182, Shell hits 1, on fire, heavy damage

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Manila , at 43,52

Japanese aircraft
G4M1 Betty x 27
Ki-27 Nate x 29
Ki-21-II Sally x 27
Ki-48-I Lily x 27
Ki-49 Helen x 27

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-21-II Sally: 1 damaged
Ki-48-I Lily: 2 damaged
Ki-49 Helen: 1 destroyed


Allied ground losses:
29 casualties reported

Airbase supply hits 1
Runway hits 4

Aircraft Attacking:
Ki-48-I Lily bombing at 15000 feet
Ki-21-II Sally bombing at 15000 feet
Ki-49 Helen bombing at 15000 feet
G4M1 Betty bombing at 15000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Johnston Island , at 104,78

Japanese aircraft
no flights
Allied aircraft
B-17D Fortress x 5
B-17E Fortress x 61
LB-30 Liberator x 32
Japanese aircraft losses
H6K4 Mavis: 1 destroyed
Allied aircraft losses
B-17E Fortress: 1 damaged
Japanese ground losses:
93 casualties reported
Guns lost 5
Airbase hits 1
Runway hits 14
Aircraft Attacking:
B-17E Fortress bombing at 16000 feet
LB-30 Liberator bombing at 17000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Singapore Fortress, at 22,51

Japanese aircraft
Ki-21-II Sally x 14
Ki-48-I Lily x 6
Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-21-II Sally: 6 damaged
Ki-48-I Lily: 1 destroyed, 2 damaged
Allied ground losses:
6 casualties reported
Aircraft Attacking:
Ki-21-II Sally bombing at 15000 feet
Ki-48-I Lily bombing at 15000 feet

Looking at these results (damaged aircraft due to flak) I'm not sure there is a flak "gap" or whatever. Seems effective to me. Anyway, considering the brutal ops losses caused by damaged aircraft over long distances (no emergency landings) if flak is a little weak, the ops losses make up for it.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Naga

Japanese Bombardment attack
Attacking force 23208 troops, 134 guns, 5 vehicles
Defending force 18397 troops, 104 guns, 0 vehicles
Allied ground losses:
114 casualties reported
Guns lost 4

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Singapore

Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 101992 troops, 680 guns, 88 vehicles
Defending force 57107 troops, 305 guns, 12 vehicles
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 6)
Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 5
Japanese ground losses:
2104 casualties reported
Guns lost 62
Vehicles lost 1
Allied ground losses:
2226 casualties reported
Guns lost 32
Vehicles lost 2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at 43,40

Japanese Bombardment attack
Attacking force 13023 troops, 89 guns, 0 vehicles
Defending force 23972 troops, 71 guns, 0 vehicles
Allied ground losses:
6 casualties reported

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at 50,30

Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 58621 troops, 567 guns, 17 vehicles
Defending force 7288 troops, 30 guns, 0 vehicles
Japanese assault odds: 71 to 1
Japanese ground losses:
206 casualties reported
Guns lost 5
Allied ground losses:
154 casualties reported
Guns lost 3
Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Wuchow

Allied Deliberate attack
Attacking force 41299 troops, 263 guns, 0 vehicles
Defending force 47282 troops, 368 guns, 41 vehicles
Allied assault odds: 1 to 1
Japanese ground losses:
602 casualties reported
Guns lost 22
Vehicles lost 1
Allied ground losses:
1172 casualties reported
Guns lost 43

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Singapore

Allied Bombardment attack
Attacking force 28506 troops, 205 guns, 0 vehicles
Defending force 98713 troops, 598 guns, 85 vehicles

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Naga

Allied Bombardment attack
Attacking force 16265 troops, 101 guns, 0 vehicles
Defending force 51327 troops, 144 guns, 81 vehicles
Japanese ground losses:
16 casualties reported
Guns lost 1
Attachments
BunaSupply.jpg
BunaSupply.jpg (20.61 KiB) Viewed 885 times
Image

Image

Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan
User avatar
Ron Saueracker
Posts: 10967
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece

RE: Bill (IJ) vs Ron (Allies): An examination of Supply and Fuel using CHS 1.06

Post by Ron Saueracker »

The supply level at Port Moresby the very next day! As soon as I saw this I realised that this flawed design feature was never addressed. Sad when the player is stuck having the AI on his/her side. What a service. Can't fire it...must be a governmwent civil service position.

Image
Attachments
PMSupply2.jpg
PMSupply2.jpg (17.29 KiB) Viewed 885 times
Image

Image

Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan
User avatar
Ron Saueracker
Posts: 10967
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece

RE: Bill (IJ) vs Ron (Allies): An examination of Supply and Fuel using CHS 1.06

Post by Ron Saueracker »

So, all that effort slowly bringing in supplies to PM, at the cost of one AK (SS American) and many crew, completely wasted by the AI. And presto, the supply moved in one turn, over the Owen Stanley Range no less! Worse, Buna is going to be captured so there is no point in bringing in more supplies. So, not only do I think there is to much supply in the game, but the darn game steals supply and gives it to the Japanese on a platter.

This needs to be addressed. The only thing I can think of is a UI addition that allows the player to chose between having a base be open to accepting supplies or not via a Yes/No toggle on the base screen.



Image
Attachments
BunaSupply2.jpg
BunaSupply2.jpg (14.43 KiB) Viewed 885 times
Image

Image

Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan
User avatar
2ndACR
Posts: 5524
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 7:32 am
Location: Irving,Tx

RE: Bill (IJ) vs Ron (Allies): An examination of Supply and Fuel using CHS 1.06

Post by 2ndACR »

Yep, hate when it does that. I have complained about that since day 1. AI sucks supplies to wherever IT wants it, not where you want it.[:@]

Does the same thing with resources and oil. Can not keep it in any one base and usually it will move it to some faraway no industry having base in Northern Japan. And then you have to ship back down again only to have it flow back north again.[:@]
User avatar
mogami
Posts: 11053
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2000 8:00 am
Location: You can't get here from there

RE: Bill (IJ) vs Ron (Allies): An examination of Supply and Fuel using CHS 1.06

Post by mogami »

Hi, Ron concerning your Tarakan bomber exploit on page 1 of AAR. You did not provide supply data so I can't say what impact supply played. (bombers need 2x required supply to fly)
However as you know (i think) no airgroup will ever fly 100 percent unless what?....... (fill in the what) It must be range of an AIR HQ!!!!!!!. Now in SRA the Japanese start on top of Air HQ and so they fly but there is not a single Allied Air HQ so no Allied group ever flys 100 percent.
Since you don't mention any data on fatigue or morale or leadership I'm guessing you don't consider these as important either. But if all these were at 100 then still only 75 percent of your aircraft would fly. But 35 percent flew so I'm guessing the other factors combined to reduce flights by another 40 percent. So all airforces in the world would only send 5 bombers when that was the max they had ready. (A ready aircraft is not just an aircraft in condition to fly it has to have all the other requirments met as well to be "mission" ready

Supply movement. Have you considered changing HQ to SW Pac and moving HQ there?
This would pull supply towards PM rather then sending it out. Don't be afraid of losing HQ it returns if lost.

Feb 42? Why hasn't Japan taken PM yet?


Weather. Weather is PREDICTED by Zone not by HEX So if it is Thunderstorm in Central Pacific it only means there is a chance for a thunderstorm in that zone. Most hexes will always be clear no matter what weather prediction is.

I think the way it works is my TF will always be in clear weather if subject to enemy air attack. My airfields will always be clouded over if enemy in range and enemy TF always have clouds over them.
Image




I'm not retreating, I'm attacking in a different direction!
User avatar
Ron Saueracker
Posts: 10967
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece

RE: Bill (IJ) vs Ron (Allies): An examination of Supply and Fuel using CHS 1.06

Post by Ron Saueracker »

ORIGINAL: Mogami

Hi, Ron concerning your Tarakan bomber exploit on page 1 of AAR. You did not provide supply data so I can't say what impact supply played. (bombers need 2x required supply to fly)
However as you know (i think) no airgroup will ever fly 100 percent unless what?....... (fill in the what) It must be range of an AIR HQ!!!!!!!. Now in SRA the Japanese start on top of Air HQ and so they fly but there is not a single Allied Air HQ so no Allied group ever flys 100 percent.
Since you don't mention any data on fatigue or morale or leadership I'm guessing you don't consider these as important either. But if all these were at 100 then still only 75 percent of your aircraft would fly. But 35 percent flew so I'm guessing the other factors combined to reduce flights by another 40 percent. So all airforces in the world would only send 5 bombers when that was the max they had ready. (A ready aircraft is not just an aircraft in condition to fly it has to have all the other requirments met as well to be "mission" ready

Supply movement. Have you considered changing HQ to SW Pac and moving HQ there?
This would pull supply towards PM rather then sending it out. Don't be afraid of losing HQ it returns if lost.

Feb 42? Why hasn't Japan taken PM yet?
Hi, Ron concerning your Tarakan bomber exploit on page 1 of AAR. You did not provide supply data so I can't say what impact supply played. (bombers need 2x required supply to fly) Mog

It's Tarakan...look at the levels on the map providied for Feb 1st...over 16.000 (loads of supply). Exploit? How do you mean...I stand down the groups the turn they transfer so no bang/zoom time travel compression oriented air missions by transferring squadrons occur.
However as you know (i think) no airgroup will ever fly 100 percent unless what?....... (fill in the what) It must be range of an AIR HQ!!!!!!!. Now in SRA the Japanese start on top of Air HQ and so they fly but there is not a single Allied Air HQ so no Allied group ever flys 100 percent.Since you don't mention any data on fatigue or morale or leadership I'm guessing you don't consider these as important either. But if all these were at 100 then still only 75 percent of your aircraft would fly. But 35 percent flew so I'm guessing the other factors combined to reduce flights by another 40 percent. So all airforces in the world would only send 5 bombers when that was the max they had ready. (A ready aircraft is not just an aircraft in condition to fly it has to have all the other requirments met as well to be "mission" ready
Mog

I'm not always saying there is a bug present. I have often shown a dislike of many aspects of the design. This is one of them. The manual can be quoted endlessly but this is moot as I'm saying the design is unwarranted/off/flawed...whatever. People shove the Bible in my face...does not mean I have to agree with it. I also don't buy into the latest explanation of morale being mission readiness of aircraft...this white wash became popular to explain away the questionable morale driven design when it came under criticsm. As an explanation it is a pretty good one and I'd buy it because it actually makes some sense, but it is obviously not the intended design because why then would we have "damaged/repairing" aircraft?
Supply movement. Have you considered changing HQ to SW Pac and moving HQ there?
This would pull supply towards PM rather then sending it out. Don't be afraid of losing HQ it returns if lost. Mog

No guarantee this will work given the supply square dance I experience in Luzon and Java...and anyway, it does not fix the issue. The supply dance in Luzon for eg, 2 HQs in Manila and huge poirtions of supply randomly move among my 4 free bases every turn or so. I have no idea what is going on and I doubt very many people actually do.
Feb 42? Why hasn't Japan taken PM yet? Mog

Gee, maybe Bill is not a gamey player or an idiot. Taking too much too fast is overly risky if one wants to preserve naval assets.


Here is another example of this erm....phenomenon. Pomala is not even a base but only a potential base yet it has had a large AK worth of war materiel shipped to it for storage. Hey Bill! I grew some torpedoes at Kendari at the torpedo plantation and have stored them for you...come and get it.[8D]

Image
Attachments
Pomoala.jpg
Pomoala.jpg (67.66 KiB) Viewed 885 times
Image

Image

Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan
User avatar
mogami
Posts: 11053
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2000 8:00 am
Location: You can't get here from there

RE: Bill (IJ) vs Ron (Allies): An examination of Supply and Fuel using CHS 1.06

Post by mogami »

Hi, Sorry wrong choice of word. I didn't mean exploit as in take advantage I meant exploit as in adventure. OK there was 16k supply there. What was required amout?


A damaged aircraft is one that will not fly regardless.
Morale and Fatigue have been known to be aircraft as well as pilots since UV design phase. (It is not an invention to explain after the fact but has always been part of calculation to see if an aircraft not otherwise reported as damaged was in condition to fly)

If a group has 30 aircraft and all are listed as ready they still might be in poor condition (shown as fatigue) Aircraft do not abort after take off because of "left engine irregular" in WITP they simply do not take off. Fighters with high fatigue might fly CAP but in cobat the aircraft cannot gain it's full potentional because aircraft engine needs overhaul (it's ready and it flys but it is not 100 percent in combat)
The morale reduction is again made before launch when in reality it would be pilots who turn back before meeting enemy. ( and those that make combat turn back more often)

Of course good leaders get their groundcrew to take better care of aircraft and get the pilots to particapte in missions.

In a game with rules it is better to follow the rules then do what you think makes more sense. The game will follow the rules so you should run your turns to follow them as well.

Tarakan had 100 aviation support?
Supply moves towards demand.
Image




I'm not retreating, I'm attacking in a different direction!
User avatar
ADM Halsey
Posts: 354
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:57 am
Location: Ohio

RE: Bill (IJ) vs Ron (Allies): An examination of Supply and Fuel using CHS 1.06

Post by ADM Halsey »

Now that I have a break in the action I can post the supply info. This is as of 02/05/42.

Image
Attachments
BaseList1.jpg
BaseList1.jpg (60.65 KiB) Viewed 885 times
USS Enterprise The Big-E Haul a## with Halsey
Image
User avatar
ADM Halsey
Posts: 354
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:57 am
Location: Ohio

RE: Bill (IJ) vs Ron (Allies): An examination of Supply and Fuel using CHS 1.06

Post by ADM Halsey »

Page 2

Image
Attachments
BaseList2.jpg
BaseList2.jpg (59.54 KiB) Viewed 885 times
USS Enterprise The Big-E Haul a## with Halsey
Image
User avatar
ADM Halsey
Posts: 354
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:57 am
Location: Ohio

RE: Bill (IJ) vs Ron (Allies): An examination of Supply and Fuel using CHS 1.06

Post by ADM Halsey »

Page 3

Image
Attachments
BaseList3.jpg
BaseList3.jpg (59.06 KiB) Viewed 885 times
USS Enterprise The Big-E Haul a## with Halsey
Image
User avatar
ADM Halsey
Posts: 354
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:57 am
Location: Ohio

RE: Bill (IJ) vs Ron (Allies): An examination of Supply and Fuel using CHS 1.06

Post by ADM Halsey »

Page 4

Image
Attachments
BaseList4.jpg
BaseList4.jpg (59.71 KiB) Viewed 885 times
USS Enterprise The Big-E Haul a## with Halsey
Image
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”