Betty Bombers

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
06 Maestro
Posts: 3997
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 10:50 pm
Location: Nevada, USA

Betty Bombers

Post by 06 Maestro »

I’m having some difficulty in getting successful naval attacks with my Betty’s. I have lost over one hundred planes w/o getting a single hit (on heavy naval units). Is there a preferred altitude for naval attack with this aircraft? Perhaps it should only be used against land targets and/or merchant marine. I’m all ears.. [&:]
Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies.

Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
ChezDaJez
Posts: 3293
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 7:08 am
Location: Chehalis, WA

RE: Betty Bombers

Post by ChezDaJez »

If at normal range, Bettys will attack ships at 200 feet with torpedoes. Altitude assignment doesn't matter. If they are at extended range, they attack with bombs and altitude does matter, the lower the better. However, if its naval vessels being attacked with bombs, its best to stay 10000' or higher even though you will have a reduced chance to hit.

Bettys have low durability and get tore up at low altitudes. Make sure its a target worth hitting.

Chez
Ret Navy AWCS (1972-1998)
VP-5, Jacksonville, Fl 1973-78
ASW Ops Center, Rota, Spain 1978-81
VP-40, Mt View, Ca 1981-87
Patrol Wing 10, Mt View, CA 1987-90
ASW Ops Center, Adak, Ak 1990-92
NRD Seattle 1992-96
VP-46, Whidbey Isl, Wa 1996-98
rroberson
Posts: 2057
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 7:53 am
Location: Arizona
Contact:

RE: Betty Bombers

Post by rroberson »

Betty bombers represent your greatest threat to allied naval shipping in game. I outta know they have cost me quite a few carriers. How do you have them set up? Are you going against hard targets (heavily CAPed carriers) or soft ones...APs bobbing around?
Image
User avatar
06 Maestro
Posts: 3997
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 10:50 pm
Location: Nevada, USA

RE: Betty Bombers

Post by 06 Maestro »

The target was a carrier battle group. I didn't realize it at the time, but there were 4 CV's with plenty of CA and at least 2 BB. I sent in a good amount of zeros', but couldn't exceed about 2/3rds of the Wildcat CAP. I knew that there would be heavy losses, but I expected to get a good hit or two.
Perhaps it's just a case of too little, too late. The fleet was just sitting there, right in my front yard, [:@]daring me, cursing me;[:@] I had to swat it, but it swat me back.[X(]
Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies.

Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
06 Maestro
Posts: 3997
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 10:50 pm
Location: Nevada, USA

RE: Betty Bombers

Post by 06 Maestro »

The attacks were all within "normal range", so I guess they went in with torpedo attacks. I suppose that the main reason for failure was the lack of adequate fighter cover.
Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies.

Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
Gen.Hoepner
Posts: 3636
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2001 8:00 am
Location: italy

RE: Betty Bombers

Post by Gen.Hoepner »

Was The experience high enough? I'd say that to be sure of hitting an allied CV with adequate fighting cover, you need to have your betties at least at 80 exp. With that ratings, even with a small zero cover, you should be able to sneak few of them through the CAP and succesfully attack his CVs...

However, in your case, if nothing else, i'd say bad dice and roll
Image
User avatar
06 Maestro
Posts: 3997
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 10:50 pm
Location: Nevada, USA

RE: Betty Bombers

Post by 06 Maestro »

I would like to post their overal ratings, but I can't because they are no more.[:@]

Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies.

Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
Hornblower
Posts: 1361
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 1:02 am
Location: New York'er relocated to Chicago

RE: Betty Bombers

Post by Hornblower »

agreed, in early '42 they cost me more ships in the DEI then i can even count.....
User avatar
Bliztk
Posts: 777
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2002 10:37 am
Location: Electronic City

RE: Betty Bombers

Post by Bliztk »

4 Carrier TFs, with at least 3xCAs and 2xCL/CLAA per TF, 70% CAP avg pilot exp 77 (now in 80s)

The betties were at normal range, but the Zeroes were at long range, that could explain things [:'(]
Image
User avatar
06 Maestro
Posts: 3997
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 10:50 pm
Location: Nevada, USA

RE: Betty Bombers

Post by 06 Maestro »

Turn 49 in you mail box. The Betties live! They just landed about 6 big fish into some Ap's headed for PM-the struggle continues. The Betties are fine now.
Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies.

Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
Bliztk
Posts: 777
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2002 10:37 am
Location: Electronic City

RE: Betty Bombers

Post by Bliztk »

Turn into your mailbox, wait until I unleash my "strategic reserve" of 170 heavies [8|]
Image
User avatar
ChezDaJez
Posts: 3293
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 7:08 am
Location: Chehalis, WA

RE: Betty Bombers

Post by ChezDaJez »


BliztK said:
The betties were at normal range, but the Zeroes were at long range, that could explain things

Maestro 06: That's one thing you might want to consider. Set your Bettys to a max range of 8 along with your A6M2 Zeros when going against any target with CAP. That way the Zeros will also be at normal range. You'll have to reduce it if you are using A6M3s.

The best aircraft to us against Allied carriers are Kates. They will get hits assuming you can protect them with a decent escort.

This is an example of what can be done iwith them f you play your cards right. I used land based fighters set to sweep to attrite his CAP first. I lost over 50 land-based fighters but he lost over 40 CAP. In the end he had nothing left overhead of his carriers. Then Hiryu, Soryu and 3 CVLs launched while 3 CVEs provided CAP over my carriers. (The date is mid October 1942).

Day Air attack on TF, near Pomala at 32,69

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 48
D3A Val x 55
B5N Kate x 82

Japanese aircraft losses
D3A Val: 1 destroyed, 15 damaged
B5N Kate: 8 destroyed, 44 damaged

Allied Ships
CV Illustrious, Bomb hits 6, Torpedo hits 5, on fire, heavy damage
CVL Hermes, Bomb hits 3, Torpedo hits 2, on fire
CV Wasp, Bomb hits 4, Torpedo hits 3, on fire, heavy damage
CLAA Columbo, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage


Unfortunately, his other two carriers, Enterprise and Indomitable escaped a later attack with only minor damage. Both Illustrious and Wasp sank. Hermes was hit again in a second attack and is now DIW and burning. It did help that I caught him in a base hex, supporting his invasion fleet. That meant he couldn't launch a full strike at me. As it was he did put 2 bombs on Hiryu for 24 sys dam but that was it.

I also had around 50 Bettys ready to fly from Kendari. Unfortunately, my opponent saw that I had just moved them in and countered with heavy bombers from Koepang. I lost 31 Bettys or his ships would have been hurt a lot worse.

Chez
Ret Navy AWCS (1972-1998)
VP-5, Jacksonville, Fl 1973-78
ASW Ops Center, Rota, Spain 1978-81
VP-40, Mt View, Ca 1981-87
Patrol Wing 10, Mt View, CA 1987-90
ASW Ops Center, Adak, Ak 1990-92
NRD Seattle 1992-96
VP-46, Whidbey Isl, Wa 1996-98
User avatar
06 Maestro
Posts: 3997
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 10:50 pm
Location: Nevada, USA

RE: Betty Bombers

Post by 06 Maestro »

ORIGINAL: Bliztk

Turn into your mailbox, wait until I unleash my "strategic reserve" of 170 heavies [8|]

I refuse to look.[:o] I;m done for the night[&o]. Maybe the bombers won't be there tomorrow-that's it!; after all, tomorrow is another day![8|]
Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies.

Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: Betty Bombers

Post by castor troy »

ORIGINAL: ChezDaJez


BliztK said:
The betties were at normal range, but the Zeroes were at long range, that could explain things

Maestro 06: That's one thing you might want to consider. Set your Bettys to a max range of 8 along with your A6M2 Zeros when going against any target with CAP. That way the Zeros will also be at normal range. You'll have to reduce it if you are using A6M3s.

The best aircraft to us against Allied carriers are Kates. They will get hits assuming you can protect them with a decent escort.

This is an example of what can be done iwith them f you play your cards right. I used land based fighters set to sweep to attrite his CAP first. I lost over 50 land-based fighters but he lost over 40 CAP. In the end he had nothing left overhead of his carriers. Then Hiryu, Soryu and 3 CVLs launched while 3 CVEs provided CAP over my carriers. (The date is mid October 1942).

Day Air attack on TF, near Pomala at 32,69

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 48
D3A Val x 55
B5N Kate x 82

Japanese aircraft losses
D3A Val: 1 destroyed, 15 damaged
B5N Kate: 8 destroyed, 44 damaged

Allied Ships
CV Illustrious, Bomb hits 6, Torpedo hits 5, on fire, heavy damage
CVL Hermes, Bomb hits 3, Torpedo hits 2, on fire
CV Wasp, Bomb hits 4, Torpedo hits 3, on fire, heavy damage
CLAA Columbo, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage


Unfortunately, his other two carriers, Enterprise and Indomitable escaped a later attack with only minor damage. Both Illustrious and Wasp sank. Hermes was hit again in a second attack and is now DIW and burning. It did help that I caught him in a base hex, supporting his invasion fleet. That meant he couldn't launch a full strike at me. As it was he did put 2 bombs on Hiryu for 24 sys dam but that was it.

I also had around 50 Bettys ready to fly from Kendari. Unfortunately, my opponent saw that I had just moved them in and countered with heavy bombers from Koepang. I lost 31 Bettys or his ships would have been hurt a lot worse.

Chez


You set your land based fighters to sweep and they attacked the carrier TF? Never heard of that. I always thought they would only attack an airfield on sweep. Or did you assign them to escort a small number of land based bombers?
User avatar
Feinder
Posts: 7201
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 7:33 pm
Location: Land o' Lakes, FL

RE: Betty Bombers

Post by Feinder »

Chez,

You said the best accuracy alt is 10,000'. I thought it was 6,000'. Are you sure it's 10k?

-F-
"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me

Image
User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 12845
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

RE: Betty Bombers

Post by Sardaukar »

ORIGINAL: Feinder

Chez,

You said the best accuracy alt is 10,000'. I thought it was 6,000'. Are you sure it's 10k?

-F-

Bets accuracy is probably at 6000 ft...but if you want to survive flak, fly 10 000 ft..[:D]. Bombers hit well from there too.
"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
Big B
Posts: 4642
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 5:41 pm
Location: Cali
Contact:

RE: Betty Bombers

Post by Big B »

ORIGINAL: ChezDaJez

If at normal range, Bettys will attack ships at 200 feet with torpedoes. Altitude assignment doesn't matter.

Chez

Just a side note here, Bettys (and Sallys) attack with torps at normal range, Great! That's what I have seen in all my games - and they torpedo lots of ships all the time...fine.

But why is it then that equivelant allied bombers have to go through no less than 7 checks to have a chance of carrying 1000lb bombs for anti-shipping? That don't seem right.

Not directed at you Chez..

B
User avatar
06 Maestro
Posts: 3997
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 10:50 pm
Location: Nevada, USA

RE: Betty Bombers

Post by 06 Maestro »

In my recent fiasco, the Betties were flying from Rabul and Lae. Lae was beyond any fighter escort, so those came in alone. The Rabul bombers had an escort, but it was on the edge of extended range-and those were the weakest fighter units (would adjust that next time). In this same strike I had 27 vals and 25 Zeros' 3 hexes away which participated in the big strike also-those units also took over 50% loss with out scoring a hit. This was a battle that should not have been fought.
Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies.

Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
Ron Saueracker
Posts: 10967
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece

RE: Betty Bombers

Post by Ron Saueracker »

ORIGINAL: Big B

ORIGINAL: ChezDaJez

If at normal range, Bettys will attack ships at 200 feet with torpedoes. Altitude assignment doesn't matter.

Chez

Just a side note here, Bettys (and Sallys) attack with torps at normal range, Great! That's what I have seen in all my games - and they torpedo lots of ships all the time...fine.

But why is it then that equivelant allied bombers have to go through no less than 7 checks to have a chance of carrying 1000lb bombs for anti-shipping? That don't seem right.

Not directed at you Chez..

B

Good question but I thought every bomber regardless of nationality did this in an attempt to simulate some sort of production/availability limitation on torps. Are you saying that once again Japan gets some sort of freebie?
Image

Image

Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan
Big B
Posts: 4642
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 5:41 pm
Location: Cali
Contact:

RE: Betty Bombers

Post by Big B »

ORIGINAL: Ron Saueracker

ORIGINAL: Big B

ORIGINAL: ChezDaJez

If at normal range, Bettys will attack ships at 200 feet with torpedoes. Altitude assignment doesn't matter.

Chez

Just a side note here, Bettys (and Sallys) attack with torps at normal range, Great! That's what I have seen in all my games - and they torpedo lots of ships all the time...fine.

But why is it then that equivelant allied bombers have to go through no less than 7 checks to have a chance of carrying 1000lb bombs for anti-shipping? That don't seem right.

Not directed at you Chez..

B

Good question but I thought every bomber regardless of nationality did this in an attempt to simulate some sort of production/availability limitation on torps. Are you saying that once again Japan gets some sort of freebie?

In the games I've played - I don't recall ever seeing Bettys or Sallys attack ships with bombs - always it has been torpedos (probably because my oppenent attacks at normal range).
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”