Attention Alpha group

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
Raverdave
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Melb. Australia

Attention Alpha group

Post by Raverdave »

Alpha groups AAR missing in action!:eek: C'mon guys ! Where are the teasers? Have you all forgotten the hype that the Alpha and Beta AARs caused with UV?;)
Image


Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
User avatar
U2
Posts: 2009
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Västerås,Sweden
Contact:

Post by U2 »

Hi
Since the new official release date is September 2003 (check the development section on the main Matrix page....I go there often to get release dates and they have all been recently updated with new dates) there is no rush for an AAR and BTW we have not been given the green light to start anything like that:)


Dan
Jeremy Pritchard
Posts: 575
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Ontario Canada

Post by Jeremy Pritchard »

AAR's during the alpha phase can be very misleading, and many games do not have them. The Alpha versions of most games are usually very incomplete, and have holes in them. Sometimes AAR's can result in a decrease in interest in a product, as its first appearance does not match that of their assumptions, and many refuse to read the fine print that states which features are not yet included in the Alpha stage (believing for some reason that this is the beta or gold AAR). Also, Alpha AAR's do take time away from what they should be doing (testing for bugs) while they are spending time trying to play a scenario from A-B which gives off a good AAR, but not as good for bug searching.

Usually Alpha AAR's appear at the end stages of alpha testing, when the testers have done their job in searching for bugs and can now play a scenario in a manner that is good for telling a story instead of repeating situations over and over again to see if something was a fluke, or a repetitive problem.
User avatar
byron13
Posts: 1594
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2001 8:00 am

Post by byron13 »

Well how about a hint as to the production model?
Image
User avatar
U2
Posts: 2009
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Västerås,Sweden
Contact:

Post by U2 »

Originally posted by byron13
Well how about a hint as to the production model?
Unless someone at Matrix or 2by3 decides to answer this we, the testers, cant do it because of the NDA.

Dan
sbond
Posts: 75
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2000 8:00 am
Location: USA

Post by sbond »

September 2003!!!?? :eek:

10 Months to do Alpha and Beta testing?
User avatar
byron13
Posts: 1594
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2001 8:00 am

Post by byron13 »

Originally posted by U2


Unless someone at Matrix or 2by3 decides to answer this we, the testers, cant do it because of the NDA.

Dan
I'm sure your nondisclosure agreement covers things like facts, algorythms, coding, systems, etc. I would also bet that it does not cover things like rumours or hints. Rumours, in particular, are not facts.

NDA notwithstanding, I definitely think you should provide either hints or rumours. Expressio unius est exclusio alterius, after all.
Image
User avatar
David Heath
Posts: 2529
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2000 5:00 pm

Post by David Heath »

Well our NDA do cover that.... and we are simply still working on it... it will be some time before any AAR are available. There is still so much that needs to be done.

David
Snigbert
Posts: 765
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Worcester, MA. USA

Post by Snigbert »

This is an immense game. The amount of testing that needs to be done is huge.
"Money doesnt talk, it swears. Obscenities, who really cares?" -Bob Dylan

"Habit is the balast that chains a dog to it's vomit." -Samuel Becket

"He has weapons of mass destruction- the world's deadliest weapons- which pose a direct threat to the
User avatar
kaleun
Posts: 5144
Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 10:57 pm
Location: Colorado

Post by kaleun »

Originally posted by sbond
September 2003!!!?? :eek:

10 Months to do Alpha and Beta testing?



Fine with me, the more Alpha and Beta testing that gets done, the less bugs for us to bug about (pun intended)
Appear at places to which he must hasten; move swiftly where he does not expect you.
Sun Tzu
User avatar
siRkid
Posts: 4177
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Orland FL

Post by siRkid »

Originally posted by byron13
Well how about a hint as to the production model?


See attached.:D
Attachments
production hint.jpg
production hint.jpg (33.91 KiB) Viewed 474 times
Former War in the Pacific Test Team Manager and Beta Tester for War in the East.

Image
Snigbert
Posts: 765
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Worcester, MA. USA

Post by Snigbert »

Too bad the mouse point text messages dont work here so they could see what each icon represents. But I think you've teased them enough already :)
"Money doesnt talk, it swears. Obscenities, who really cares?" -Bob Dylan

"Habit is the balast that chains a dog to it's vomit." -Samuel Becket

"He has weapons of mass destruction- the world's deadliest weapons- which pose a direct threat to the
User avatar
Grotius
Posts: 5842
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2002 5:34 pm
Location: The Imperial Palace.

Post by Grotius »

Very nice hint indeed. This game looks cool. UV on steroids.

And yes, my mouse keeps hovering involuntarily over the mysterious production icons! Force of habit, I guess. WiTP apparently features a lot of interesting production choices. Most of the icons signify their meaning clearly, but there are a couple of mysteries, most notably the "gears" with the initials N and M.

I want this game now.
Image
Snigbert
Posts: 765
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Worcester, MA. USA

Post by Snigbert »

Well, there are two varieties of shipyard in that screenshot.
"Money doesnt talk, it swears. Obscenities, who really cares?" -Bob Dylan

"Habit is the balast that chains a dog to it's vomit." -Samuel Becket

"He has weapons of mass destruction- the world's deadliest weapons- which pose a direct threat to the
User avatar
Grotius
Posts: 5842
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2002 5:34 pm
Location: The Imperial Palace.

Post by Grotius »

So, any more hints to drop? I know you alpha testers can't say much, but maybe Kid has another screenshot or two to deploy...
Image
User avatar
siRkid
Posts: 4177
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Orland FL

Post by siRkid »

Originally posted by Grotius
So, any more hints to drop? I know you alpha testers can't say much, but maybe Kid has another screenshot or two to deploy...


We are waiting on the next build to come out. We have gone as far as we can on this build. Right now, other than the map and the production icons the screen shots would not be much different than UV. We are hoping the next build will be stable enough to get some PBEM games going. If that happens, maybe we can post some AARs.

Rick
Former War in the Pacific Test Team Manager and Beta Tester for War in the East.

Image
User avatar
Slick91
Posts: 261
Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2002 8:05 pm
Location: North Carolina, USA

Screen Resolution (1024)?

Post by Slick91 »

Can you at least clarify if 1024x768 resolution will be available as is with Uncommon Valor?

The WITP web site only says 800x600.
Slick
-----------------------------
"Life's tough, it's tougher if you're stupid."
-John Wayne
User avatar
Slick91
Posts: 261
Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2002 8:05 pm
Location: North Carolina, USA

Re: Screen Resolution (1024)?

Post by Slick91 »

Originally posted by Slick91
Can you at least clarify if 1024x768 resolution will be available as is with Uncommon Valor?

The WITP web site only says 800x600.


Never mind, found my answer... :o It will support 1024x768 (as well as 800x600).

showthread.php?s=&threadid=30924
Slick
-----------------------------
"Life's tough, it's tougher if you're stupid."
-John Wayne
User avatar
siRkid
Posts: 4177
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Orland FL

Re: Re: Screen Resolution (1024)?

Post by siRkid »

Originally posted by Slick91
Never mind, found my answer... :o It will support 1024x768 (as well as 800x600).

showthread.php?s=&threadid=30924


I'm using 1024 X 768:D
Former War in the Pacific Test Team Manager and Beta Tester for War in the East.

Image
User avatar
Grotius
Posts: 5842
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2002 5:34 pm
Location: The Imperial Palace.

Post by Grotius »

<< We are hoping the next build will be stable enough to get some PBEM games going. If that happens, maybe we can post some AARs. >>

That would be great! :p I'll keep my fingers crossed
Image
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”