Search found 53 matches

by Oddball_France
Fri Nov 12, 2010 7:22 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Emergency Reinforcements--WC
Replies: 41
Views: 716

RE: Emergency Reinforcements--WC

has anyone calculated how much time do the airplane groups come in advance due to the invasion ? 6 months ?
by Oddball_France
Fri Nov 12, 2010 6:26 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Supply attrition
Replies: 27
Views: 348

RE: Supply attrition

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: VSWG<br/>
<br/>
Maybe add a supply cap for non-base hexes as well? Something like 100 supply per day per jungle hex, 200 supply per forest hex, 500 for clear hexes, etc.
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
<br/>
nice, but i would suggest no limit for clear hexes ...
by Oddball_France
Tue Jan 12, 2010 6:00 pm
Forum: The War Room
Topic: Can I do this??
Replies: 10
Views: 151

RE: Can I do this??

i think so, yes

i do the same with dutch units (and some others)
by Oddball_France
Sun Jan 10, 2010 3:13 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: OT: Need firearms advice... UPDATED
Replies: 61
Views: 786

RE: OT: Need firearms advice...

can i ask you where are you from, P.Hausser ?
by Oddball_France
Sun Jan 10, 2010 2:46 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Scenario 2 - Ki-44 Tojo wrong
Replies: 33
Views: 484

RE: Scenario 2 - Ki-44 Tojo wrong

exactly, which corresponds with the bad stats the gun have in game (range, accuracy...)

just one thing, it is also written that the 40mm gun version was a small/short serie.
by Oddball_France
Sun Jan 10, 2010 1:56 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Scenario 2 - Ki-44 Tojo wrong
Replies: 33
Views: 484

RE: Scenario 2 - Ki-44 Tojo wrong

<r> i've found one saying the game is true as it is.<br/>
<br/>
Maybe not the best source (wiki has a bad reputation but...), and it's in French, but the article seems complete. take it like you want<br/>
<br/>
<URL url="http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakajima_Ki-44">http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki ...
by Oddball_France
Sun Jan 10, 2010 11:09 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Amphibious invasion of Pearl Harbor - results
Replies: 635
Views: 8074

RE: Amphibious invasion of Pearl Harbor - results

<t> I think that we should roughly go with a simple rule as a basis, concerning disruption at landing. (don't know about fatigue ? half the disrupt ?)<br/>
<br/>
before any more disruption caused by defensers, units should have something like (50-(preparation/2)) disruption added.<br/>
<br/>
So ...
by Oddball_France
Sun Jan 10, 2010 9:11 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Amphibious invasion of Pearl Harbor - results
Replies: 635
Views: 8074

RE: Amphibious invasion of Pearl Harbor - results

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: PaxMondo<br/>
<br/>
I'm not seeing a problem. Jap commits it's entire national force against Singapore in a surprise attack. Why doesn't that work? It's PH only smaller. <br/>
<br/>
In any case, it is just a trade-off and one that I think is entirely within ...
by Oddball_France
Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:56 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Supply Consumption by LCUs
Replies: 7
Views: 121

RE: Supply Consumption by LCUs

what about the consumption of moving units compared to static ones ?
by Oddball_France
Sun Jan 10, 2010 7:48 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Amphibious invasion of Pearl Harbor - results
Replies: 635
Views: 8074

RE: Amphibious invasion of Pearl Harbor - results

<t> I forgot to mention : <br/>
all the units i checked (the "big" rgts) had something like 0 to 3 disruption and fatigue before i launched the assault, with 0 preparation for Singapore (didn't check but i guess so)<br/>
<br/>
(sorry for spelling mistakes, i'm not a native english and i type too ...
by Oddball_France
Sun Jan 10, 2010 7:42 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Amphibious invasion of Pearl Harbor - results
Replies: 635
Views: 8074

RE: Amphibious invasion of Pearl Harbor - results

<r> reserved for day 2<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Dec 08, 41<br/>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br/>
Invasion Support action off Singapore - Coastal Guns Fire Back!<br/>
<br/>
124 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.<br/>
<br ...
by Oddball_France
Sun Jan 10, 2010 7:42 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Amphibious invasion of Pearl Harbor - results
Replies: 635
Views: 8074

RE: Amphibious invasion of Pearl Harbor - results

<t> Reading the thread, i just souht a funny thing : let's get rid of all the Malaya campaign and invade Singapore on day 1.<br/>
I did that on head to head, half an hour time, "just to see".<br/>
<br/>
I basically send the whole fleet which was due to leave Samah, joined together in a mega fleet ...
by Oddball_France
Sat Jan 09, 2010 10:39 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Fortifications ?
Replies: 5
Views: 130

RE: Fortifications ?

<t> hum, i've found an answer from vanilla WitP<br/>
<br/>
Fort(0) = 100% AV <br/>
Fort(1) = 125% AV <br/>
Fort(2) = 150% AV <br/>
Fort(3) = 175% AV <br/>
Fort(4) = 200 % AV <br/>
Fort(5) = 225 % AV <br/>
Fort(6) = 250 % AV <br/>
Fort(7) = 275 % AV <br/>
Fort(8) = 300 % AV <br/>
Fort(9 ...
by Oddball_France
Sat Jan 09, 2010 8:47 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Fortifications ?
Replies: 5
Views: 130

Fortifications ?

<t> Two questions today :<br/>
<br/>
- what are the bonuses for each fortification level ?<br/>
lvl 1 => +xx%<br/>
lvl 2 => xyy%<br/>
<br/>
- do the fortifications the units in "open field"(= no base to me) build work exactly the same way (same bonuses ?) ? In "open field" you can build fortif ...
by Oddball_France
Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:13 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Patrol and refueling at port
Replies: 4
Views: 124

RE: Patrol and refueling at port

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Don Bowen<br/>
<br/>
In fact, you do not need to have one of the patrol boundaries set to the port - TFs should auto leave/return to patrol zone when fuel is needed.
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
Really ? So nice ! [:)]<br/>
That's why i liked WitP and love ...
by Oddball_France
Fri Jan 08, 2010 1:34 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Patrol and refueling at port
Replies: 4
Views: 124

Patrol and refueling at port

<t> I'd like to make some ASW TFs patrol around a port (it seems people use "Patrol" only for subs, why ?), without worrying about refueling, nor having to give the same order every 3 turns (the ASW include some short legged ships).<br/>
<br/>
That for, I have selected the port as one of the 3 ...
by Oddball_France
Fri Jan 08, 2010 7:30 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Max XP by shakedown cruise ?
Replies: 39
Views: 1462

RE: Max XP by shakedown cruise ?

it seems to confirm my observations ! thanks !
by Oddball_France
Fri Jan 08, 2010 6:26 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Max XP by shakedown cruise ?
Replies: 39
Views: 1462

Max XP by shakedown cruise ?

<t> Roughly, <br/>
all the pilots can up their xp up to 70 without fighting (training...)<br/>
IJN LCUs can up their xp up to 50 without fighting (prep at 100 and then..) (65 for marines, aso..)<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
What about ships ? Is there a max xp we can't get over just by cruising (shakedown ...
by Oddball_France
Sat Dec 26, 2009 3:25 pm
Forum: The War Room
Topic: Leader replacement newbie guide ?
Replies: 3
Views: 150

Leader replacement newbie guide ?

<t> hi all<br/>
<br/>
i'm basically looking for a newbie guide (something like Kull's Allied spreadsheet would be lovely, but a few advices could already help !) about which commander to replace with who, if possible in order of emergency.<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
Precise examples : <br/>
<br ...

Go to advanced search