<r> Nah not offended. To be fair I did think about resurrecting the thread, however in effect its the same issue and I thought I'd found a solution.<br/>
(I'm not so sure now, i.e. the Russian Sonar's are getting the effect of active pinging when they aren't.)<br/>
<br/>
Been retesting the same ...

<r> Attached should be a variation.<br/>
<br/>
This is a save from the Seventh Battle, oner is from slightly further out one closer in.<br/>
Ignore the rest of it but a Los Angeles at 5 knots shallow is approaching a task group also at 5 knots centred on Gorshkov. This is off the coast of Cape ...

<t> I think hidden underneath all this there is a problem am afraid.<br/>
<br/>
Just playing Arctic Tsunami under version 1147.14.<br/>
<br/>
In essence I have manoeuvred an Astute towards a Russian group in sea state 2. <br/>
I am at shallow depth at 5 knots. The Russian have a Udaloy, a ...

<t> <br/>
Well I'm going with that there is an issue as far as I can see.<br/>
<br/>
I've tried a 1987 date Nimitz Class vs a 1987 Los Angeles class.<br/>
<br/>
In the end I fired ten Mark 48 model 4 torpedoes into the Nimitz.<br/>
<br/>
On the tenth hit the Nimitz sank which probably raises ...

Tech Support: fb.asp?m=4865714

<r> Well, I've done some testing and not sure if I am helping!<br/>
<br/>
I'm using Steam so to be fair the version is 1147.4<br/>
<br/>
Fired 4 ADCAP from a Los Angeles into a Kusnetsov. The damage looks OK, roughly 20% per torpedo hit. However it didn't sink and very quickly the report came ...

<t> Anyone know if there is a known issue with Torpedo damage at present?<br/>
Sorry for the vague posting, I can narrow it down more if it needs a bug report, but noticing it anecdotally with my admittedly Steam version.<br/>
Put six torpedoes into a Midway class carrier earlier and did half ...

Looked to be an unusual scenario and think the balance is right overall.
I ended up using the Typhoon's in one patrol, ran out of Meteor's reasonably rapidly but also got in some ASRAAM' kills.
Ended on a score of 29 for a minor victory.
Nicely worked out.

<t> <br/>
Tried this as the USSR side (of course).<br/>
This is a pretty massive scenario starting 14th July 1989.<br/>
<br/>
The problem having play tested this a few times is winning while not getting Japan involved.<br/>
<br/>
At game start there are a number of surface groups, plus a ...

That might explain it!
Will try the released as well.

<t> <br/>
Played through and manage a triumph at about 1100 points.<br/>
Kept the CVBG at creep which helped it pick off several subs.<br/>
Did a TLAM strike on Keflavik which you rightly say failed utterly!<br/>
The Northern group eventually destroyed almost in a single strike, oddly enough ...

<t> <br/>
I tend to find you definitely use different tactics for NATO and for Russian type submarines.<br/>
<br/>
If NATO at game start I'll often go to creep, search behind and the levels, then maybe even take a look at periscope.<br/>
I'll often load up with TLAM or Harpoon and aim to use ...

<t> <br/>
Tried this out and the TLAM strike does seem to trigger the Japanese as hostile. Oddly enough it didn't actually affect much as I kept my aircraft grounded at first. In the end the one Victor III tracked the CVA group but didn't get into shooting range, however the Foxtrot did. All six ...

<t> <br/>
Nice scenario, most things working very well, the messages and missions worked out nicely.<br/>
You're definitely behind the curve in this one and the scoring is a struggle. I peaked at about 70 points, but in the end managed an average -30. (And I worked dam hard for that!)<br/>
The ...

<t> Runway didn't work, sadly I spent a lot of time desperately hoping it did. Couldn't work out why it didn't. I didn't see any damage but several ammo bunkers were damaged and on fire, while splash damage had hit one of my patrols even.<br/>
I suspect I'd have got a narrow win of sorts even ...

<t> Tried the AMRAAM scn, figured it would be easier with AMRAAM's which of course you don't get!<br/>
Majority works, but its probably easier than anticipated. think mine was a triumph losing 5 Eagles and a score of 205.<br/>
The biggest thing I think is that the enemy don't fire at BVR much if ...

<t> <br/>
Thought most things worked, very enjoyable scenario.<br/>
Interesting that I may (or may not) have won despite losing air cover. Effectively I think a Kitchen strike took out both runways and Keflavik stopped operating.<br/>
However the LA sank I think Slava and Kusnetsov before being ...

<t> Played through successfully for a minor victory, biggest problem was dodging G rail's I think. I wasn't sure if FARC got overwhelmed or didn't fire much? Think I detected anti tank type stuff but relatively little small arms fire.<br/>
Overall lost six Tucano and six Armoured cars.<br/>
Nice ...

<t> <br/>
Scored a triumph, all seeming to work out well.<br/>
NK struggled as in this one the sub attack was identified as NK Romeo so I felt my orders allowed retaliation. As far as I can see from my ROE that was right, though it did mean I was ahead of the game mostly.<br/>
I struggled to stop ...

<t> <br/>
Afraid I had the same result, its a nice scenario but the speed of attack is too fast for me. I think I lost in about 8 minutes or so?<br/>
I thought I was being clever and swapped to air to air load out to win the air war. I didn't, effectively lost control over the rigs area before the ...