<t> On a big tv WITP AE and WITE look great, everything is clear. The games look better on the big tv.<br/>
<br/>
If you worry about wattage being consumed check the power saving setting, most modern tvs have a power saving setting. <br/>
<br/>
Other games such as shooters are not so great ...

The above link for 1.08D needs to be updated

http://www.ageod-forum.com/showthread.php?t=17731     beta patch 1.08E

I have been using 3 day turns against the AI in full campaign games, 1 day turns in the smaller scenarios AI and pbem.

The majority of players seem to like 1 day turns.

Are there any disadvantages to using 3 day turns?

No full campaign played pbem but the smaller scenarios a few times. Hence newbie in post title.

Got the game when it was released.

This game has many facets so I am not an AE jedi master.

I will only play pbem using 2 or 3 day turns.

<t> Scenario 1 or 2<br/>
<br/>
Play to completion<br/>
<br/>
3 day turns<br/>
Allied damage control ON<br/>
Player defined upgrades ON<br/>
Unit withdrawals ON<br/>
Reinforcements extremely variable +/- 60 days<br/>
Player defined upgrades ON<br/>
Reliable USN Torps OFF<br/>
Advanced ...

Have you looked at Drupal.

http://drupal.org/

There must be other programs for creating websites and forums, try google or one of the other search engines.

How about Saturday GMT 1200 hours, GMT+1 1300 hours?

Anyone up for a battle?

I sometimes play on a 42" with no problems.

Not all games look great. For example CCMT and COTA look great but Harpoon 3 ANW does not.

The watts used restricts how much I will use the 42" compared to the smaller monitor.

With a base like Pearl Harbour you would want to target its facilities.&nbsp; For example an opponent who loses millions of gallons of oil will have to change plans.

Maybe if the Japanese had taken all available carrier aircraft more strikes could have taken place. The only drawback could possibly be the speed of the other carriers.

Shame stock is not designed with this sort of plan from the outset.

Will be following your AAR to see how you get on.

<t> I don't see anything wrong with the Japanese staying longer at Pearl Harbour. The major problem are the full campaign scenarios are not designed for a longer operation at Pearl Harbour. More resources would have been used for the operation. It is a whatif scenario. <br/>
<br/>
In WitP AE and ...

<t> So the majority think Pearl is untouchable. <br/>
Pity a few big ships could not get within range of Pearl Harbour. Couple of hundred or thousand shells landing on Pearl would have caused a lot of damage. The shells from the ships would have been a lot heavier than aircraft delivered bombs. <br ...

<t> Surely destroying the machine shops and oil farms would have had an effect. At least buying the Japanese more time.<br/>
<br/>
I did not say invade Pearl Harbour but stop it from being used as a port. The Americans would have had to travel a lot further to get their naval units into the ...

For FireFox try right mouse click and "save image as".

<t> Better strategy for the Japanese<br/>
<br/>
I thought War in the Pacific was about destroying the other sides AC, then invading and securing resources. If the other sides AC are destroyed then your ships can operate in safety, apart from sub threats.<br/>
<br/>
If the Japanese have lots of ...

UK link working.

As for the orgy bit...

Historically US subs probably destroyed more tonnage per sub, compared to the German U-Boats and the Japs. The Japanese did not use the subs to their full potential.

Great releasing the manual early. [:)] Could the printable version be released as well?