<t> Hmmm, in case you would mean my scenario Decision in the North 1941-42 about Finnish and German joint operations during Barbarossa... then NO, it´s not ready yet! I am upgrading it for TOAW IV, though slowly. If it is "available" in somewhere else, please don´t play it. I will publish it here ...

<t> This is exactly what I was talking about in another thread. I noticed event and reinforcement/withdrawal issues when upgrading one of my old scenario to TOAW IV and playing it out myself. These things need to be checked by designer. It simply is not loading up old stuff with the editor, save ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Silvanski<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Olorin<br/>
Yes, I demand it.[:@]<br/>
Please?[&o]
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
Let me get a second opinion...[;)]<br/>
<br/>
What do you think Klink[&:]<br/>
<br/>

<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
Well ...

<t> As for WitE...how about reducing Soviet rail capacity so that it would be more difficult and slow to evacuate those factories? So that the Soviet player would really have to think whether he can afford to run and give ground around key industrial cities if he is going to save his war-economy ...

<t> <br/>
I have scenarios in mind that I would like to try out with the editor, but frankly I don't even know how to start. How to cut the map/define the playable area for instance? How I build the OB? I am missing all the basics. Is it intended that there would not be a lot of "user-created ...

Been wondering about what's up with the documentation about how to actually use the editor and create scenarios? The one that came with the game is...hmm, too general and a bit short. So any update on that? Thanks.

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Navodchik<br/>
<br/>
I like the game itself very much, however it has been a while (some years actually) since I have played this kind of complex and grand scale strategy game, and personally I would have been more than delighted to have full and complete ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: dlazov66<br/>
<br/>
I just looked and it does not appear that there is a way to mod the HQ to use multiple flags, icons or other images. All counters get one type of icon. So you can mod the HQ icon to a flag of one type or another but you can't have multiple ...

Nice map. Shows the Soviet attack 1944 I suppose with that Soviet naval invasion on the coast. Something that should be allowed also in WiTe at Ladoga area.... there were also Finnish/German/Italian(sic!) naval attempts to harass the Russian supply route to Leningrad over Ladoga.

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Pertti<br/>
<br/>
The problem is that Finns had set up five different border options in 5/41, depending on the German success. (below a short summary)<br/>
1. Russia would be a major force even after the war and would hold Murmansk, therefore the Murmansk ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Jakerson<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
Well this problem can be solved to allow Finnish troops to attack over the no attack line but suffer big moral penalty from fighting other side of line. This makes Finnish troops less likely to be able to penetrate and decent defenses ...

<t> <br/>
Also consider the numerous Soviet Siniavino offensives to raise the Leningrad blockade that took place in swamps... Or Staraya Russa area offensives or Volkhov... In all these battles terrain that was mostly marshlands greatly favoured the defender and Soviets took terrible losses for ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Budman<br/>
<br/>
Some of my reading indicates that the Germans simply were not comfortable fighting in woods, swamps, etc. because they had no (or very few) areas where they could effectively practice this skill - the forests in Germany being 'new' forests (ie ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Klydon<br/>
<br/>
Part of the issue is the rail line going across the Svir river is tied into the Finnish rail net when in fact this was not the case. The rail line comes down from Murmansk and served no real purpose to the Finns there from a logistics stand ...

<t> <br/>
<br/>
Well I think we should not consider every "swamp" hex actually a swamp...there are so many different types of them out there in the nature. I consider it just difficult terrain area with non-existent or very sparse/poor roadnetwork. Hard to go through with motorized force ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Navodchik<br/>
<br/>
However, I think that when Russo-Finnish "Continuation War" ended in september 1944, it released huge amount of Soviet forces, who now were capable to fight against Germans. Does this show in the game in any way? I do not know the excact ...

<t> <br/>
Excellent work. I too am used to use NATO symbology and I think I'll keep with that. However, this raise one idea: currently WitE has only one kind of HQ symbol - the HQ. I would propose the "flag" sort of symbol for higher HQs. It would help to recognize Army Group and especially Army ...

<t> <br/>
Yes I fully agree about the map! It has been "cut" at totally wrong place. I doubt this will be changed though - too much work for too little gains I guess.<br/>
<br/>
Yes it needs to be understood that Finnish economy, politics etc were not supporting continuous offensive over the stop ...

<t> <br/>
I just finished this scenario against normal Soviet AI and lost. The AI got a minor victory. Though, had I got one more turn I would have taken Vyazma and Bryansk....just one more turn! I was at outskirts of both cities by the last turn. Don't have figured out yet how to take a screenshot ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: BigAnorak<br/>
<br/>
I think it was design decision to reflect the lesser tactical/operational flexibility of the Axis Allies compared to the German tactical doctrines, but maybe a developer can comment on the design decision
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br ...