<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: BBfanboy<br/>
<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Drakanel<br/>
<br/>
So, I backtracked an searched, and last known location of the KB1 was on 29th of may. With a heavy volume radio at truk on the 3rd of june. So, a month ago in-game.<br/>
<br/>
What do ...

<t> So, I backtracked an searched, and last known location of the KB1 was on 29th of may. With a heavy volume radio at truk on the 3rd of june. So, a month ago in-game.<br/>
<br/>
What do you make of it? It seems a very, VERY long time without using KB1 considering that 1942 is the last year where ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: zuluhour<br/>
<br/>
I would like to see the Chittagong Ledo Rangoon box.<br/>
Maybe with a Intel monkey assessment of Rangoon Magwe<br/>
Ledo areas. Typing on my pad sorry for typos.<br/>
<br/>

<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
I concur. I'd like to see a ...

<t> Well, the japanese advance into the "usual targets" seems to be proceeding rather expeditely.<br/>
<br/>
So.... where do you think the hammer will fall?<br/>
I am curious. How do you read the situation? Do you foresee any major invasion outside of the hystorical japanese perimeter? India ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: ny59giants_MatrixForum<br/>
<br/>
A few turns have occurred, but scrolling down the Sink Ships list shows the following lost at Portland:<br/>
46 CVE<br/>
183 xAK<br/>
43 SC<br/>
77 TK<br/>
4 AM<br/>
28 LST<br/>
5 AK<br/>
14 YMS<br/>
3 AKA<br/>
10 APA ...

<t> I have just read your thread, as well as John's. I am a sucker for double AARs, and so I will follow both sides. As such, my comments will be by necessity "neutered" because I know too much. I am not experienced enough anyway, so my hypothetical suggestions would likely be of no value [:D]<br ...

<t> Finally found the time to get up to speed with the thread. Real life commitments... [:D] Hopefully less busy now for a while.<br/>
<br/>
I am amazed at your resilience when facing this situation. Surely Obvert is a competent and aggressive player, but still your defense is certainly spirited ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: John 3rd<br/>
<br/>
Kitakami is taking FOREVER to get Turn Two done. Always kid people that the only thing worse then Turn ONE for Japan is Turn TWO for the Allies. Talk about 'click' fatigue! <br/>

<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
It's the famed "Death by a ...

<r> This is fascinating. I am relatively new to the game and the forums (at least compared to most regulars [:D]), and I have not followed an AAR with a West Coast invasion before. <br/>
<br/>
I will be following this <E>:)</E><br/>
<br/>
Mind if I ask a couple of questions?<br/>
Do you already ...

<t> I read both AARs. Last few turns have been extremely entertaining [8D]<br/>
<br/>
I think you did pretty well all things considered. And the cost to you, for now, is rather low all things considered. I was actually expecting something like this, because you had no sightings of the Ally ...

<t> I had actually foreseen something like this might happen. Since you had been away with your carriers for so long, and his navy was still relatively intact.<br/>
<br/>
I also thought you had some more surface TFs at Shikuka, especially regarding battleships and CAs/CLs. Still, so far the losses ...

Thanks a lot for the AAR. Was a very entertaining read. And hats off to you for seeing it through the end. Never easy to do that...

Congratulations, and thanks a lot for the AAR. It was quite fun though I did not follow it since the beginning.

Curious to see where your game with Obvert will go now.

One or two turns left it seems....

Yeah I know, useless, easy prediction now [:D]

I will be following this. And, forgive me the boldness, hope that your opponent does surprise you with daring and problematic campaigns.

I know, I'm part of the peanut gallery. Good luck [:D]

<r> Or, if you take Singapore, that would almost tip you over the AV threshold by itself <E>:P</E><br/>
<br/>
I don't think it's impossible with what you are moving there. It's a lot of decent troops, and it seems he doens't have tanks to contend against your tanks, not even counting the quality ...

<t> Frankly, I don't see who would criticize you over that.<br/>
One, it makes sense to do it. You have the strength to do it, to fight on all those fronts.<br/>
Two, it's better to have multiple approach vectors instead of just one. Having multiple plans means that even if something does not go ...

Since experienced people have deeemed the assault viable, know this:

The peanut gallery demands an assault on Singapore [:D]

ORIGINAL: jwolf

In fairness, that is fun to do even if it doesn't make strategic sense.

Indeed it is fun.

It is still a game. Wanting to win is normal, but the journey is more important than the destination [:D]

Hrm, so much for trying to defend port Moresby. Ah well, got to draw the line somewhere else [:D]

Btw, it's always hilarious when that happens against a small ship like that

Both Task Forces evade combat

KB + escort is really afraid of AM Whyalla!