I played some turns of the 1939 Campaign of CEAW - GS 4.0, as the Allies. The AI player declared war on Poland, and took 6 or 7 turns to capture Warsaw.
It also declared war on Belgium on turn 1, but did not invade until turn 7 or 8 - in the winter. The surprise bonus was therefore wasted. It did ...

I have installed CEAW Gold. I have found my old install file for CEAW - GS 4.0.
I am interested in getting back into the game, but the old CEAW AI was not that great.
I understand that CEAW-Gold has had some AI tweaks. Did CEAW - GS 4.0 have similar AI tweaks?
Which game version has the best AI code ...

Great new, Hubert and Team!

It is time for another strategic-level Pacific Theatre wargame.

I still play SC3 WWII War in Europe and World at War regularly.

I am a Civil War history buff and gamer. I have played most of the existing ACW board and PC games.
Before I purchase this game, I wish to know how this game models the indecision and inactivity of Union generals - such as McLellan - for the first few years of the War.

Do generals have an ...

How do unit advancements work?

I have an Axis armoured unit with 1941 Heavy Armour advancement.
My tech has increased to 1942 Heavy Armour.
I am not allowed to change my armoured unit advancement to 1942 Heavy Armour.
Is this because the unit will now automatically upgrade to 1942 Heavy Armour ...

In my game as Axis, I have cut the rail line from Murmansk to the rest of the USSR.

Will the Allied AI player's lend lease convoys now be routed to Archangelsk, but not in winter months - when the White Sea is frozen?

Doe the AI player save up all the PPs that cannot be sent to Archangelsk in the ...

I like simple solutions! Thanks for checking, Alvaro.

Alvaro, could you award an extra considerable (100 VP?) one-time VP bonus to the side which captures VP hexes?

<r> Japan<br/>
<br/>
<IMG src="https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfiles/103/4274180A82D5441D85AFF3A7687A6EC2.jpg"><s>[img]</s><URL url="https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfiles/103/4274180A82D5441D85AFF3A7687A6EC2.jpg"><LINK_TEXT text="https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfi ... 7A6EC2.jpg ...

<r> USSR<br/>
<br/>
<IMG src="https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfiles/103/CA3A96C969954D32BB50E3FE6F38E3BA.jpg"><s>[img]</s><URL url="https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfiles/103/CA3A96C969954D32BB50E3FE6F38E3BA.jpg"><LINK_TEXT text="https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfi ... 38E3BA.jpg ...

<r> China<br/>
<br/>
<IMG src="https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfiles/103/056346ADAE48435E976AD19DCAA7382A.jpg"><s>[img]</s><URL url="https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfiles/103/056346ADAE48435E976AD19DCAA7382A.jpg"><LINK_TEXT text="https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfi ... A7382A.jpg ...

<r> Alvaro, the whole game, for the US, I put 4-6 points into assault, LR Subs, carrier Ops, naval air, interceptors and amphib.<br/>
I put 9 points into SB the whole game, as I was testing to see if I could achieve SB 45 by game end.<br/>
It seems unusual that I could never achieve any level 45 ...

Thanks for fixing this issue, Alvaro

<t> I agree. Tinian was the base that the Enola Gay bomber took off, with the A bomb. <br/>
Tinian/Saipan is out of range of Hiroshima and Nagasaki until the US can achieve the SB 45 advancement (with a +10 range bonus). <br/>
In my recent game as the US, it was not possible, even with the maximum ...

<t> HK is a 9 Port Supply city with 180 supply, not a Main Supply city as are Japanese Home cities.<br/>
<br/>
Alvaro - can Hong Kong be successfully interdicted for supply purposes, by enemy naval ships?<br/>
<br/>
Also, please fix Canton, as it cannot be interdicted by enemy naval ships, by ...

In my game, I just moved a Tac Group with SB specialty (range 14) from Okinawa to NW Borneo = 27 hexes, and a Tac Group with a NA specialty (range 8) from South Japan to North Japan = 15 hexes.

<r> I just finished my first 1942 campaign as Allies. Here is the final VP screen.<br/>
<br/>
The USA had conquered all the Pacific VP locations: Rabaul, Truk, the Philippines, Okinawa, Guam, Saipan, Kwajalein, Iwo Jima.<br/>
The USA only lost 2 CVs and 4 BBs. Therefore it deserved a 'Individual ...

<t> The fact is, that even with 5, 6 or 9 chits invested in (for example) Assault, Carrier Ops, LR Subs and Strat Bombing, at the end of my game - Sept 1, 1945, none of these advancements are even close to being achievable, even if the game went to the end of 1945.<br/>
Therefore something is ...

<t> Thanks for that information, Alvaro.<br/>
<br/>
The issue still remains that it is impossible for the US to acheive the SB 45 advancement by anywhere close to game end.<br/>
<br/>
Therefore I am suggesting that the SB 44 advancement, which is achievable in late 1944, have the range bonus ...

<r> I had previously posted that I considered the base SB range and/or its advancement range bonus a historically too short.<br/>
<br/>
I just finished my first 1942 campaign as the Allies. At the start, I assigned the maximum number of chits into the SB category for the US. At the end of the game ...