<t> I have finally taken the plunge in playing H3 after purchasing some time ago, and I have noticed something that I would like to see improved.<br/>
<br/>
The report screen for contacts only lists what active emissions are detected from a contact (or just acoustic for sonar) and not the ...

How about setting one of your fighter sqd. on escort with the airdrop base as the target?

<t> I bought WITP when it came out, but have never had the time to play it. <br/>
<br/>
I ran accross UV in the PX in '02 and bought it on a whim (I had never heard of it). I have been playing it on and off since then, as the scale is considerably more manageable than WITP.<br/>
<br/>
It is my ...

<t> Just a thought.<br/>
<br/>
Coast watchers a far easier to implement than EW.<br/>
<br/>
Aircraft wouldn’t be limited by the horizon, but I don’t know if WW2 reconnaissance aircraft were capable of using DF for enemy detection. <br/>
<br/>
In any case that could be a whole can of worms to ...

<t> Not necessarily, coast watchers were relying on visual sightings which are far more revealing then simple radio direction finding. I would think DF would be limited by horizon, at least as far as being useful for triangulation.<br/>
<br/>
Also, coast watchers reports may have been better ...

<r> PTO Series, now that brings back some memories....Long before I had a PC, the Sega Genesis was my only means of gaming<SM sm="sad-1361.gif">[sm=sad-1361.gif]</SM>. PTO 2 was the best of them, 4 absolutely sucked. They are all lame compared to UV/WITP, both of which are what the PTO series could ...

Any news would be nice. I think I play UV more then WITP (smaller scale) and would like some info about the status of the patch.

<t> I left the Army in '03 as an E-5 19K(M1 crewman). I decided to go back in (I ship out 11/08) and they let me keep my rank. You have two years from your date of separation, to enlist and keep your rank. I was a little over two years so the recruiting station put in an EIS waiver request, which ...

Now thats a great movie.

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Speedy<br/>
<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Terminus<br/>
<br/>
Even if the 109s and 111s were Spanish.
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
And that makes them not genuine WW2 aircraft?
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
<br/>
Spanish 109's used the British ...

Then it must be Fallschirmjager (that he meant).

ORIGINAL: Terminus

ORIGINAL: m10bob

(The Shirmfalljaeger used them as well..)

Shirmfalljaeger?

I think he means Schutzstaffel (SS).

ORIGINAL: Yamato hugger

pak 75 would be my guess.

I thought PaK meant Panzerabwehrkanone. Which means anti-tank cannon in German. Maybe they really are SS[:D]

<t> I happen to agree that there is definitely a negative outlook in the current press regarding any military action made by the U.S. Does anyone remember the crap from the first gulf war? “Saddams desert veterans are going to make mince meat out of the green armies of America” and so forth. Then ...

<t> I have to second the question. I’ve often felt the most daunting thing when trying to play scen 15 (esp. Japanese) the first time, is trying to understand the current unit organization and strategic posture. Its like Yamamoto or Nimitz starting the war with amnesia. So far I've stuck to the ...

I think he was comparing the losses of a single terrorist attack (9/11) versus the cumulative losses of a war (Iraq), not that Iraq was responsible.

Any word from mods yet about the server?

<r> nice info<br/>
<br/>
<IMG src="https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfiles/13161/95BD9C74D1244D64BBD16E634447F5ED.jpg"><s>[img]</s><URL url="https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfiles/13161/95BD9C74D1244D64BBD16E634447F5ED.jpg"><LINK_TEXT text="https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfi ... 47F5ED ...

I think it's a server issue. I can't download anything from Matrix. I am getting a message that the server refused connection (firefox).

That is great news![:)] Thank you for the clarification. Speaking of patches.........[;)]