Do you meant those from 13 MAY 2005 ? [X(]

I am looking foward PBEM game!!

oppppsss i did not read the whole topic ... [:D]

Great news Matrix take into account TMR.

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: NeverMan<br/>
<br/>
So, let me get this straight, every leader can carry up to 10 corps without any penalties?<br/>
<br/>
OK, now I am definitely NOT buying this game. It's sad to see such a great game continue to go down the tubes due to poor advised "tweaks ...

<t> Uhmmm a good game... that's the point ..<br/>
I´ve been playing wargames for 20 years (hope it becames 60 more [:'(]) and it is hard too say whats a good game ...<br/>
To me a good game is the one that every time you play it, the game changes, i mean, i dont like linear games where you have to ...

<t> I do agree with Strategy...<br/>
EiA rules couldn´t cover an Ancient world game ... but i good like to see a game were Romans and Carthaginians cnat see face each other... [X(] or Greece would have something to say ... <br/>
<br/>
Taking a look at older games could game a good idea to develop ...

LOL Yohan ... give me a (1) [:'(]

Please Mr. Ellis, would be lovely, great, fabulous more of those AAR's wich make us dream ... [:D]

<t> I agree with you, Forward_March, Russia has a distend situation in game, but not that much ...<br/>
If Russia starts to rush Prussia or Austria, will give a winning status to France, and that's something Great Britain , should not allowed... I have seen a powerfull Great Britain (1809-1810 ...

<t> This that I think about how the rules try to simulate reality:<br/>
When in campaing, armys used to take little battles all along the month, in an area, as armies moved back and foward in an area along one month, so, how to to this in a game,<br/>
and make a game playable ??? a player moves ...

<t> the pop of the question should be ... why are you attacking NAPO !!!!!!!!!!<br/>
<br/>
Now , not kidding, probe is good is you are defending , even if attacker doesnt take Outflank ... and you have better morale ... but if, you attack, and the defender is a high strategic valued general ...

LOL i played this one as a home rule .... [;)]

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: mattbirra<br/>
<br/>
if my memory doesnt play with me, when invading you are captured when retreating , but you are absolutely rigth ... how the game is implemented in this issue !!!!!!
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
<br/>
well .. finally i decided to check ...

thx Pippin, great news detalled rules comes with game... [:)]

if my memory doesnt play with me, when invading you are captured when retreating , but you are absolutely rigth ... how the game is implemented in this issue !!!!!!

<t> So , if an unload from ship with a depot you have to retreat to ship ??? ...<br/>
then how those troops should get the ship ... should them be destroyed or captured ????? [&:]<br/>
or you can move towards a depot in England ... uhmmmm ... too hard to believe ... so then again ...<br/>
Should ...

ok tahx for answers mates, didnt remember the rule [;)]

yeah, its like sacrifice guard to give army time to retreat, by holding the back of the retreat army.
Why not ?????

i havent play board game long ago but capturing an army is only possible when witdrawing in an unload from ship
Am I rigth ?

<r> I would like to know how is implemented next issue:<br/>
Lets suppose, we have Napo with one corp in Vienna at war with Austria an Russia, and, in a adjacent area, there is a stack of , say, 15 corps with Charles (it’s an crazy example, but what matters is the fact [:D]),<br/>
Austria moves ...