Thanks, unfortunately is only a very allied centric update.
Was there no Japanese team member to fix the issues in Japanese side?


Which issues need to be fixed?

The option to massively increase the aircraft production way beyond the historical levels? ;)

The unthinkable Army-Navy ...

Thanks, unfortunately is only a very allied centric update.
Was there no Japanese team member to fix the issues in Japanese side?

I spent a year in high school checking the mailbox every day waiting for a mail order Campaigns for North Africa to come in, and of course it was over a year late. Thanks SPI.


I'm still waiting for my copy of Jutland from Avalon Hill. I wonder if the money order I paid with is still valid ...

These are not outliers. If they were i would not complain.

Even if it will come i am not optimistic it will fix things like the very high chance of torpedo bombers hitting ships with bombs instead of torpedoes at 5000-10000ft, even one aircraft putting 2 bombs into a ship. Level bombers with torpedoes not attacking cargo and troops ships with 99 morale and ...

So, any prediction?

The problem is know what is the the "balance" when the player is waging an alternate story. Japan did not made hunter killer teams afaik , we don't know how much aerial search resources Japan deployed to fight submarines. instead if we can devote more resources , which will mean more "interceptions ...

In general the number of DC racks/firing channels, distributed by stern and sides is a measure of ASW ship effectiveness in this game. Things are more complicated in Allies since there are different DC types but for Japan that is a straightforward evolution typ 95 > typ 96-2 > typ 2 . There i an AS ...

Concur, thanks Chris.

This could be in the Set Home Port field, instead of base it will be a TF. I am ware of the issues of meeting with patrol.

Don't know if it was on the list, but a TF base to return to should can also be another TF. That way you can send a build a mini TF from main TF that will return to the main TF.

What you can do is change the starting port size in the editor (you will have to save the changed database as a new scenario). And if you change the SPS for the port as well you can make it easier to build or enlarge the port.

I know that, but not what i want. Thanks anyway. I want to dock ...

Is the whole "Disband TF confirmation button" really necessary though? We already go through so many clicks in the game and now they want to add even more clicks to that LOL.

Because accidental disbandment causes way more clicks and grief than one extra click to confirm the disbandment. At ...

Currently a port 1 size allows a 6000t ship to dock , it is also its capacity overall. I think that too big for the smallest port and think also as the port are decreasing in size the more difficult for bigger ships to dock.
Is it hard coded or it it possible to change in editor?

Thanks but that is a lot of clicks.

What options i have to not be pestered by the "Disband TF" and even worse do not allow me to click in it ?

Read about it here. With 3 types of units

https://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USN/re ... index.html

Those are Army not Navy.

On another example i was not expecting to see duplicated units still in the game = Japanese 43 Construction Co.

Another pet peeve of mine is also that IJN AA do not move around. It is basically stuck into base force concept regardless of more or less threats in some area.

Thank you Sardaukar.

More questions about mods, any historical mod that corrected data mistakes. Like Thalia (sorry mean Theresa too short legs in official game) range, floatplanes and patrol aircraft without cameras, missing ship classes etc?