...agreed...That's just a blanket statement to cover their worthless hides.
...Like I said before; I wonder who Mr. Rose pissed off perhaps its personal, maybe he whelched on a bet[;)]...
Moderator: maddog986
...agreed...That's just a blanket statement to cover their worthless hides.


ORIGINAL: ravinhood
A bit off topic, but, concerning how baseball has turned into a big business sport instead of just good ole fashioned baseball, I have to say I enjoy every season when the NYY's don't make the playoff's or if they do they get beat out.
6 WS, winning 4 of them (all 4 without being the highest payroll team) It must be a miserable decade in Ravinhood land, what with all the RTS's, Matrix Re-releases and Yankees lol.Spending 100's of millions of dollars to get many of the best players in the league and still lose just makes me laugh.
ORIGINAL: ravinhood
Now, I just need me Texas Rangers to get there.
ORIGINAL: ravinhood
A bit off topic, but, concerning how baseball has turned into a big business sport instead of just good ole fashioned baseball, I have to say I enjoy every season when the NYY's don't make the playoff's or if they do they get beat out. Spending 100's of millions of dollars to get many of the best players in the league and still lose just makes me laugh. Baw haw Haw Steinbrener. lol As far as big business it's really only big business to those that can pariticpate and there's only a handful of teams that can really participate. I do actualy enjoy when the world series is some new teams or teams that haven't won in a 100 years. lol I'm not a Boston fan, but, I was pretty happy for them winning the world series after so many years. Whitesox as well. Even to have lived long enough to see the Astros get in a World series was great. Now, I just need me Texas Rangers to get there.![]()

Wasn't the Pirates cocaine issue part of the late 70's? Even thought the trials were in the 80's it was established they were using going back into the 70'sORIGINAL: robpost3
Yes, waiting in line like everyone else to get their chance to see baseballs greatest...He should be in the Hall.
Bench too...and Morgan.ORIGINAL: sven
Well "everyone lies about gambling!"......
but I digress, frankly when the Red Machine was in swing there were two kinds of fans in my circle....
Rose or Bench.....
I was a Bench fan....
and Hank, man they are classy acts...Imagine all the kids that would be sold out if it was Clemente or Aaron, or Seaver he was squeaky clean...
Side tracking but, the 70's make a good argument forthe last greatest decade in baseball: pound for pound...Maybe it's just the 80's and that whole Flock of Seagulls thing[;)]but with few exceptions iconics and spirit that was last great crop of true ball players...
measured by deed and not commercial success...
Rose is a weed!
ok go down to Walgreens and pick up a couple bottles of anabolic steroids and let's see how legal it is without a perscriptionORIGINAL: Charles_22
ORIGINAL: Knuckles_85
What McGwire and the crew did was worst. What they did was illegal.ORIGINAL: anarchyintheuk
There wasn't any rule against steroids, hgh, etc. when McGwire et al were using them. There was a rule against betting on baseball when Rose was managing.
I wouldn't let him in the hall ever. He voluntarily signed a document divorcing himself from baseball. Don't sign what you don't mean. Fork him.
Ray Fosse's revenge is dish best served cold.
Edited to add gratuitous comment.
I fail to see how it was illegal. There were no prohibitions in baseball to it when most of them started, then when Bobby Bonds starting going wild people started worrying about it and started to want to ban it. Then, of course, none of players wanted to admit it, so they just tried to wean themselves off of them or just kept trying to hide it. I suppose baseball couldn't have cared less unless it was apparent, such as in Bonds case, that their use might just boost performance more than just a little bit.
ORIGINAL: Knuckles_85
Wasn't the Pirates cocaine issue part of the late 70's? Even thought the trials were in the 80's it was established they were using going back into the 70'sORIGINAL: robpost3
Yes, waiting in line like everyone else to get their chance to see baseballs greatest...He should be in the Hall.
Bench too...and Morgan.ORIGINAL: sven
Well "everyone lies about gambling!"......
but I digress, frankly when the Red Machine was in swing there were two kinds of fans in my circle....
Rose or Bench.....
I was a Bench fan....
and Hank, man they are classy acts...Imagine all the kids that would be sold out if it was Clemente or Aaron, or Seaver he was squeaky clean...
Side tracking but, the 70's make a good argument forthe last greatest decade in baseball: pound for pound...Maybe it's just the 80's and that whole Flock of Seagulls thing[;)]but with few exceptions iconics and spirit that was last great crop of true ball players...
measured by deed and not commercial success...
Rose is a weed!
I grew up in Chicago and was always a Frank Thomas, Black Jack McDowell, Carlton Fisk fan. I stopped watching for a long time after that strike year. Actually what got me back watching baseball again was I became a fan of Jon Lieber on the Northside. Now I'm a fan of both teams (even though I lean heavily toward the Sox). By the way old Comiskey wasn't as great as people try to make it out to be. Tearing it down was just another reason to vilify RiesendorfORIGINAL: sven
ORIGINAL: robpost3
Rose is a weed!
absolutely but hey "everybody lies about *insert whatever we were lowering the bar for back in the '90s*"....
I liked Morgan and Griffey the elder as well.....
I grew up an hour north of Cincy Pete and Johnny were the cat's meow but hell I have yet to see a team better than the BRM at its peak....
Baseball died for me when they killed the World Series....
I go to minor league parks.
The fact that you can get it as a prescription shows it's legal. It's just a matter of convincing a doctor to go along. It's just that getting it as a prescription makes it a little more difficult to obtain. A really illegal drug would not be available by prescription at all. Despite what the law might technically say about it, if I can get something from a doctor it isn't illegal, at least as long as I get it through him, or if I were a pro athlete that I got it from a trainer who got it from a doctor. If you are getting a drug from some punk on the corner, that a clue it's might be illegal, though such a punk selling steroids, if in fact they do, doesn't automatically discount the fact that said drug may be legal. There are a number of drugs purchased by such means simply because some people are trying to cheat the system and are trying to get higher dosages than the doctor allows.ORIGINAL: Knuckles_85
ok go down to Walgreens and pick up a couple bottles of anabolic steroids and let's see how legal it is without a perscriptionORIGINAL: Charles_22
ORIGINAL: Knuckles_85
What McGwire and the crew did was worst. What they did was illegal.
I fail to see how it was illegal. There were no prohibitions in baseball to it when most of them started, then when Bobby Bonds starting going wild people started worrying about it and started to want to ban it. Then, of course, none of players wanted to admit it, so they just tried to wean themselves off of them or just kept trying to hide it. I suppose baseball couldn't have cared less unless it was apparent, such as in Bonds case, that their use might just boost performance more than just a little bit.
ORIGINAL: Fredk
Using performance enhancing drugs violates the sanctity of the statistics.
No it is not. Doctors lose their licenses and go to jail for writing fake prescriptions because it's a controlled substance. If all you had to do was find a physician that will write a prescription then Todd Sauerbraun's physician wouldn't be in jail nor would the Steelers team doctor would be under indictment.The fact that you can get it as a prescription shows it's legal. It's just a matter of convincing a doctor to go along.
Because with both of those you still have to do the work. You are not introducing a foreign substance into your system.ORIGINAL: James Ward
ORIGINAL: Fredk
Using performance enhancing drugs violates the sanctity of the statistics.
How is using a performance enhancing drug different than hiring a personal trainer and dietician to keep you in top shape? Aren't both methods something other than the athelete doing it all by himself?
ORIGINAL: Knuckles_85
Because with both of those you still have to do the work. You are not introducing a foreign substance into your system.ORIGINAL: James Ward
ORIGINAL: Fredk
Using performance enhancing drugs violates the sanctity of the statistics.
How is using a performance enhancing drug different than hiring a personal trainer and dietician to keep you in top shape? Aren't both methods something other than the athelete doing it all by himself?
That depends on what you're use to eating!
Certainly both give you an edge over those who don't hire a trainer or take drugs.
If you would do it on your own, why would you pay a trainer and dietician? In effect with a personal trainer and dietician are you 'buying' an edge over others who either don't think of it or can't afford it.
There are similarities.