Quick Question:

Does this version also have the properly LAA-flagged .exe file, or do I still have to apply the .exe patch shown in 936.11 thread? I haven't downloaded 936.11 yet.

Thanks!

<r> Sunburn, thanks for your response.<br/>
<br/>
I gave up axe-murdering a long time ago. There just didn't seem to be much of a future in it, and chain saws are much more effective anyhow. <SM sm="00000055.gif">[sm=00000055.gif]</SM><br/>
<br/>
p.s. The "hostage-ware" title sure wasn't my idea ...

If you generate a Delta template .ini file using the SBR function and apply the file during the deep rebuild process, you can keep any special loadouts, magazines, and fuel states intact. If you do just a straight deep rebuild, you lose any special settings and everything reverts to default.

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Sunburn<br/>
<br/>
I looked into this now.<br/>
<br/>
1) Using a previous build, you added a "Laser Shot (Solid State Fiber)" weapon to the ship "DDG 127 Biddle". If you had attempted to fire this weapon in pre-v1.12 versions, you would have received a "this ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Primarchx<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: tk208<br/>
<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: apache85<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
True it'd be nice if it was all free but I think we can all agree that the constant updates and continuing support do ...

I guess I'm a little disappointed to see new game engine features only available thru paid DLC, but I guess it was inevitable for business reasons.

Thumbs up.....

Just a bump.

Should I put this in the DB3000 request area instead of Tech Support?

<t> Is it possible to have the MALD, MALD-J, and Harpy/Harop loiter/circle at the end of their plotted paths instead of continuing on in whatever direction they were heading until they run out of fuel?<br/>
<br/>
I know that you can generally control the MALD and MALD-J to zig zag back and forth ...

<r> Not exactly "Breaking News", but I thought it was an interesting read:<br/>
<br/>
<URL url="http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/how-one-very-special-us-submarine-ravaged-japan-during-world-19746"><LINK_TEXT text="http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-bu ... orld-19746">http ...

<t> I don't have a save game for this, because the behavior resets on game save/restart. But here is how to re-create.<br/>
<br/>
1. Create a launch order for a weapon that is BOL-capable, but don't progress the game past that (i.e. don't let the platform fire)<br/>
<br/>
2. Save the game, exit ...

Thanks, glad you are enjoying it.

One BIG mistake I made was to have all of the PAK-FA's blaring out their radars, shouting "I'm right here!" I think having most of them in stealth mode would make a big difference.

<t> I should probably revisit and revise that scenario. With all the recent System and Database changes, it could probably use some tweaking....like some random events so repeat players will still be challenged [:D]<br/>
<br/>
But I do have a question, what were your results/losses the FIRST time ...

<t> Yeah, basically all of the Antelope and Centurion CIWS had a LaWS system added on. Some bases had up to 3 of these systems, and some were guarding radar installations and protecting certain missile units as well. Once they were activated in the latest Build...it was clearly WAY too much. Blue ...

<t> Now that lasers are active in the final SR7 Build, I can see that I have been way to aggressive in deploying LaWS systems onto CIWS units for the blue side, making blue-side facilities and airbases pretty close to invulnerable. I will need to take some of them out and re-think this issue in the ...

<t> Fair enough, I'll wait for awhile after SR7 Public version is released before adding to Community Pack. Yes, the current version is SR7 Build 906.20, but the Public version will have the lasers re-activated so the player action will change.<br/>
<br/>
I'm in no hurry, I'll just move on to my ...

I'm going to be making some final tweaks/changes to this one over the coming weekend and will put it in the Community Scenario Pack folder on the forum.

If anyone has any comments or suggestions, let me know.

Thanks!

Thanks for the heads up. The scenario I mentioned uses the LaWS, so I'm glad I didn't delete them yet.

I saw the change log for Build 906.21. Was it intended that all red-side airbases now show as individual components (runways, access points, ammo dumps, etc.) and not grouped units? The Group/Unit view does not change this.

Thanks.

Yes, there are two other Japanese ships that are the same. I emptied them of the Hyunmoo missiles on purpose. The only ones you have are on TF Sejong. I'll delete the TF Atago Hyunmoo magazines on the final version.