Search found 61 matches

by NimitsTexan
Mon Jun 01, 2020 11:56 pm
Forum: Scourge of War: Waterloo
Topic: NSD Website - New Address
Replies: 6
Views: 1995

RE: NSD Website - New Address

Anyway to enable my user account to log into the forums over there? I have an account (same name as here), but it keeps telling my I do not have access to the site's private area.
by NimitsTexan
Sat May 30, 2020 5:37 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Matrix Game Site Down?
Replies: 8
Views: 478

RE: Matrix Game Site Down?

The store, at least, is still down.
by NimitsTexan
Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:11 am
Forum: Carriers At War
Topic: Carrier Ratings
Replies: 31
Views: 635

RE: Carrier Ratings

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Troutie_SSG<br/>
<br/>
I'll try to answer all of your questions, Joe.<br/>
3. The presence of arming/fueling planes on deck has a huge effect on the spread of fire and permanent damage. If you strike the Akagi when her decks are clear and ordnance stowed, I ...
by NimitsTexan
Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:00 am
Forum: Carriers At War
Topic: Nagumo has too many Zeros?
Replies: 40
Views: 588

RE: Nagumo has too many Zeros?

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Joe D.<br/>
<br/>
Removing (all) the 6th Ku Zeros and shifting the random clouds to an East/West axis along Midway should help balance this scenario, and that's all I'm asking.
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
Well, again, I would not recommend removing all of ...
by NimitsTexan
Mon Sep 24, 2007 2:09 am
Forum: Carriers At War
Topic: Nagumo has too many Zeros?
Replies: 40
Views: 588

RE: Nagumo has too many Zeros?

<t> Arguably, removing the 6th Kokutai from play could also be ahistorical, since those Zeros were available for duty. That more were not launched had probably more to do with IJN doctrine and the generally fouled up condition of the IJN organization and intelligence&nbsp;in the hour or two prior to ...
by NimitsTexan
Sun Sep 23, 2007 1:02 pm
Forum: Carriers At War
Topic: Nagumo has too many Zeros?
Replies: 40
Views: 588

RE: Nagumo has too many Zeros?

Actually, if you read Shattered Sword and look at the Fighter Operations timline in the back, at least 3 of the 6th Kokutai Zeros were launched from Akagi.
by NimitsTexan
Wed Jul 04, 2007 5:38 pm
Forum: Carriers At War
Topic: (Some) Zeros Search Qualified in Santa Cruz Scn
Replies: 8
Views: 148

RE: (Some) Zeros Search Qualified in Santa Cruz Scn

<t> Towards the end of the Solomons campaign, the IJN were starting to use mixed Zero/Val groups for armed recon/search missions, and (though I can't remember the exact reference at the moment) I am pretty sure I recall land-based Zeros being sent on search missions in the Solomons&nbsp;in 1942. I ...
by NimitsTexan
Sat Jun 30, 2007 8:36 am
Forum: Carriers At War
Topic: AA fire
Replies: 25
Views: 679

RE: AA fire

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Gregor_SSG<br/>
<br/>
Well, I think you're making too big a deal about this. Especially early in the war, it didn't matter what your AA doctrine was, AA was simply not going to make a huge difference to the outcome of a strike. As the war progressed, both sides ...
by NimitsTexan
Sun Jun 24, 2007 3:21 pm
Forum: Carriers At War
Topic: surface combat - what am I missing?
Replies: 13
Views: 321

RE: surface combat - what am I missing?

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Adam Parker<br/>
<br/>
[I was going to ask if this could be factored into the game?<br/>
<br/>
I caught an episode of "Dogfights" on the History Channel last night showing the battle of Taffy 3 with its CVE's vs the Yamato surface group at Leyte and smoke ...
by NimitsTexan
Sat Jun 23, 2007 7:25 am
Forum: Carriers At War
Topic: Hitting DD's with air launched "fish"?
Replies: 7
Views: 186

RE: Hitting DD's with air launched "fish"?

Did not G4Ms torpedo the USN destroyer Jarvis off Guadalcanal?&nbsp;
&nbsp;
I also know some IJN DDs were hit by TBMs in the last 12-18 months of the war.
by NimitsTexan
Fri Jun 22, 2007 3:45 pm
Forum: Carriers At War
Topic: Short Midway AAR
Replies: 2
Views: 62

Short Midway AAR

<t> So on my second time through the Battle of Midway (after losing all three carrier in exchange for only 2 IJN flattops), I finally felt I knew what I was doing. Mimicing Fletcher and Spruance, I decided to keep my flattops NE of Midway and out of range of any IJN strikes until the Japanese had ...
by NimitsTexan
Mon Jun 18, 2007 9:10 pm
Forum: Carriers At War
Topic: Some points of discussion
Replies: 31
Views: 306

RE: Some points of discussion

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Prince of Eckmühl<br/>
<br/>
A couple of points about damage in the game:<br/>
<br/>
U.S. carriers go down more often than their Japanese counterparts because they take more hits. While they should be able to absorb more punishment because they were better ...
by NimitsTexan
Mon Jun 18, 2007 8:58 pm
Forum: Carriers At War
Topic: Dual role of the Dauntless
Replies: 3
Views: 57

RE: Dual role of the Dauntless

<t> For example, if you were to play Midway "historically" as the USN, you would turn off all the search sectors for the Enterprise/Hornet group, and leave on only the Northeasterlt sectors for Yorktown to prevent an ambush, letting PBY's do most of the spotting. By 1942, the terms "Scouting ...
by NimitsTexan
Mon Jun 18, 2007 12:30 am
Forum: Carriers At War
Topic: Why you don't launch at dusk
Replies: 33
Views: 344

RE: Why you don't launch at dusk

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: walterlzw<br/>
<br/>
Read Toland's book, too. The Manchurian faction of the Japanese Army happen to be responsible for most of the attrocities in China. I guess lofty ideals and big guns don't mix.<br/>
<br/>

<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
Toland is too ...
by NimitsTexan
Sat Jun 16, 2007 4:14 pm
Forum: Carriers At War
Topic: CAP benefit from Radar
Replies: 19
Views: 190

RE: CAP benefit from Radar

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Prince of Eckmühl<br/>
<br/>
Well, here's another one, from Midway again. The Allied CAP was 52, strong, all pre-designated for TG defense, and scored no kills against the incoming strike a/c.<br/>
<br/>
PoE (aka ivanmoe)<br/>

<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br ...
by NimitsTexan
Thu Jun 14, 2007 11:03 am
Forum: Carriers At War
Topic: B17@Midway
Replies: 12
Views: 175

RE: B17@Midway

There should be a mix of B-17Ds and B-17Es (mostly Es) at Midway. But that is not the only error. The Wake Island Scenario has G4Ms, when in reality they should be G3Ms.
by NimitsTexan
Tue Jun 12, 2007 7:58 am
Forum: Carriers At War
Topic: Pranged?
Replies: 7
Views: 121

RE: Pranged?

Aussie slang for American vs. Japanese carrier ops . . .?
&nbsp;
Oh well . . .
by NimitsTexan
Tue Jun 12, 2007 7:28 am
Forum: Carriers At War
Topic: Can yout TF or TG shoot down enemy search planes
Replies: 4
Views: 111

RE: Can yout TF or TG shoot down enemy search planes

Well, hopefully CAP has at least a small chance of preventing a sighting report. There were a few cases where US fighters downed IJN search planes before the latter relayed any (useful) information.
by NimitsTexan
Mon Jun 11, 2007 7:16 am
Forum: Carriers At War
Topic: Where are the USMMC F2As on the Sara?
Replies: 2
Views: 31

RE: Where are the USMMC F2As on the Sara?

Something else that maybe needs correction for the Wake Island Scenarios:

The IJN bombers used to bomb Wake were (with one possible exception) G3Ms, not G4Ms.
by NimitsTexan
Fri Jun 08, 2007 11:01 pm
Forum: Carriers At War
Topic: How many aircraft could the Shinano hold?
Replies: 12
Views: 543

RE: How many aircraft could the Shinano hold?

<t> In actual wartime combat operations, the most any IJN heavy flattop ever carried was 81 (Kaga for the Pearl Harbor Operation), and standard loads were 54-63 aircraft. I do not believe the Shokaku class ever carried more than 70, while the Hiryu/Soryu airgroups never exceeded 63 (again at Pearl ...

Go to advanced search