You mean like he made it possible for 150mm+ artillery in non artillery units capable of reducing fortifications? :lol:


Have no idea what you are talking about. Just trying to provide a solution.

Neither do I. But, when the Supply Module (next) is completed, we will have discrete supply ...

I've been stuck on this problem for a while: I found that the last version I posted couldn't read most older files. (Shown as bug #13 below). I've now got this fixed so that it can. Now I can finally get back to the legacy bugs. :roll:

Moral: Making scenario files backwards compatible is a real ...

I've been stuck on this problem for a while: I found that the last version I posted couldn't read most older files. (Shown as bug #13 below). I've now got this fixed so that it can. Now I can finally get back to the legacy bugs. :roll:

Moral: Making scenario files backwards compatible is a real ...

rhinobones wrote: Sun Oct 12, 2025 5:44 pm It’s time for you to be proactive and get a firm date for beta release.

I addressed that earlier:

https://forums.matrixgames.com/viewtopi ... 5#p5231715

In other words Eric's reply is: See Steel TIgers. Same verbage. That one has been on the back burner for such a long time the fire has gone out, the gas line has been disconnected and the house it was in has been torn down.

I don't think anybody has even coded anything on Steel Tigers yet. TOAW ...

Last word from Erik:

https://forums.matrixgames.com/viewtopi ... 3#p5231473

heppy1972 wrote: Thu Oct 09, 2025 1:29 am What does the AT represent? I tried to find this info in the manual, but I couldn't find any reference, and even when I went to the section that was referenced it still wasn't clear to me... I was about to create this post question when I saw it was already asked...

AT = Anti-Tank

73

Started in 1974 (Senior in college) with SPI. First of SPI's was Leipzig.

First PC game was Aces of the Pacific in 1992 (Flight sim) along with Task Force 1942 in 1992 (Naval sim).
First true PC wargame was Battleground Gettysburg in 1995. Edit: Actually, Pacific War (1992) and War in Russia ...

Good to see you back, Stefan!

One aspect of supply distribution under the new supply rules to bear in mind is that clear (or arid) terrain gain no supply distribution advantage from roads ... unless mud or snow is present. Lesson here is that maps with lots of clear terrain hexes tend to easily distribute supply during fair ...

Seems to me these special units should be able to ignore zones of control while exerting none of their own.

To do SEALs right, at a minimum they would need five icons: Amphibious, Mountain, Airborne, Airmobile, and Guerrilla. Guerrilla probably should have some of the above. Someday.

But, just ...

Gotta have mountain ability to climb Major Escarpments on the coast.


If there are major escarpments on the coast, simple, don't land there.

If there are no geographical obstacles, SEALs aren't needed => the hex is a beach (anchorage). Just send regular infantry in a landing craft. For this ...

Nevertheless, I've never been happy with units disembarking into deep water hexes so I'm going to finally revise the game so that is no longer possible with one exception:
I'm going to allow it for what I'll define as "SEAL units": A unit with both the "Amphbious and Mountain Icons ...

I updated the Overview attachment to reflect this new SEAL feature in 3 f. Also added 2 d ii.

Even waiting till the next turn so that the unit hasn't been moved, it still can't disembark:

Now, one of the non-SEAL units is adjacent to a qualifying location, but it can't disembark:

And another one (next to jungle and bocage):

And another (next to alpine and hills):

Another qualifying location (next to mountain coastal hexes):

Here's another qualifying location with disembark ability for SEAL units: