blu3s wrote: Tue Feb 25, 2025 6:52 am Mmm that sounds like an issue with the dateformat, have you selected the correct one that match your locale configuration?

Yeah, that is exactly the issue, good UI, thanks!

So I noticed a weird thing, I finished the deployment, I clicked on continue and it just says "THE SCENARIO HAS ENDED
Blue Strategic Win" ...? Here's my save file.

What I have found is that a hit, even a minor hit is enough to deflect the RV away far enough to not be a threat. The odds are still greater than zero of the RV hitting something, but its very dependent on what intel says about expected threats.


So a hit that does not destroy the fireball will ...

Not sure why but I can not open the scen file, can you check if the missiles datalink is connected to a submarine? Submarines can not update the target location for the missile.

See here: https://command.matrixgames.com/?p=4076 (Section "ABM Warhead Modifiers")


I see, thanks for the answer! So looks like it's because RVs are fast and are sort of non-aerodynamic targets. Then I have some other questions: For RVs with sensors, when destructions doesn't happen, should we ...

Hello, I know we have a chance of destruction calculation for non-HTK warheads vs RVs and it's based on real-life scenarios. My questions are
1. Why is this happening? Because RVs are fast? Or it's because RVs are tough?
2. If it's because of the speed, should we also add this check for other fast ...

thewood1 wrote: Mon Jun 26, 2023 10:29 pm Not sure if you meant to quote me. I never addressed or mentioned the dive.

NVM quoted you by mistake sry about that.

The overshooting might be an issue, but the sharp dive should be WAD. https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/view ... 1&t=396293 this is mentioned in the latest update log.

Dimitris wrote: Tue Nov 22, 2022 11:03 am Anything on this ?

Hello Dimitris, so I just got it triggered again. I opened the game and played some scens yesterday, and now I see the burn time being different again. I am very sure that it changes, but I just don't know exactly how to repro it.

Dimitris wrote: Mon Nov 14, 2022 5:22 am Same database version?

Yes as said in the title, v497.

Seem that the missiles(like r-77m or aim-120d) burning time is not a stable number? Somehow it changes when I restart the game or create a new scenario. E.g: for now the R-77M's burning time is 48sec in this pic, but I remember clearly it was 52 or 49 initially. I don't have a scen for that since I ...

To clarify:

There is a known DB issue with the motor type of the AIM-120D & AIM-260, they should be "Rocket - Long Burn" instead of the current "Rocket - Boost/Coast". The current erroneous type gives them an unrealistically low boost time (and thus low speed at edge-of-envelope shots). However ...

In the attached scenario we can see that even though the target is already within half of the entire range, we still get an "out of DLZ range" if we try to manually fire the missile, and after we finally reached the range and fired the missile the motors only burn for like 4 sec.

gennyo wrote: Tue Oct 18, 2022 2:28 pm 1283 seems like fixed this, OP could have a try.

Just did a test and I don't think it's fully fixed, will start another post.

In the attached scenario we can see that even the target is already within 20nm, we still get a out of DLZ range if we try to manually fire the missile, and after we fired the missile the motors only burn for like 2 sec.

Hi all, I tried to do a test using sm-6 against fighters (480kt, 36000ft with radar off, regular proficiency, heading towards the ship), And then I realized that the missile always got outrun by the target that is out of 25 nm, also as the distance decreases the missile actually flies slower. (I did ...

https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/view ... 1&t=379426 If it's a DB related issue please use the database request tracker.

I think your point on the speed of the shooter is spot on, but its actually closure rate to the target thats most important. All of these numbers are based on so many variables as to be impossible to have one static number. Coming back to the point of this thread, and several other recent threads ...

While not detailed, I thought the below graphic from one of the links shows a good representation of the Meteor compared to other AAMs.

1_UBhwWHV-HWIXlRcJ-tY9Yw.jpeg


Haven't looked through all the articles but I have something I would like to say. First, IIRC the officially claimed range ...

Based on looking at NEZs for modern rocket-only missiles like the 120C/D, 15-20 nm is not too far off. But so many people complained about the short NEZ, that I think the devs overcorrected.

And a 4+++ gen fighter with AWACS support is a worst case scenario for an NEZ. I think some of this might ...