I agree completely!

I am using 12.06. The German rail reservation percentage is still there, at the bottom left of the production screen.

Very useful. Thanks.

<t> I'm playing a solitaire head-to-head campaign game updated one turn ago to v1.12.06.<br/>
<br/>
Leningrad and NW Leningrad have been isolated for several turns. At the end of Axis Turn27, an infantry division and Leningrad Front HQ were in NW Leningrad. Launching the Soviet Turn27, NW ...

Problem solved with installation of vcredist_x86.exe as suggested in another thread.

<t> I am attempting to install my game on a new Windows 10 computer. Downloading PC Installer 1.01 results in a functioning game. However, updating with either of the 2 versions of 2.02 that appear in my account /downloads wrecks things. I get a non-functional start menu.<br/>
<br/>
Any ...

In the 43-45 Campaign with additional Air HQs, the CO of the 3rd Bomb Division does not appear in the leaders section of the CR.

Several turns on there is no attempt by the AI to repair the damaged rail sections. Can the Axis player do anything to repair the rails?

Thanks Joel.

In a 43-45 campaign game using the latest beta (.72) I see a couple dozen hexes of 100% rail damage in in southern Italy the turn after Italy surrendered. Is this a consequence of the surrender? I can find no mention of this happening in the living manual.

Good resource. Thanks for the heads-up.

<t> I've noticed that in the 43-45 Campaign game there are 2 Mosquito PR16 squadrons. When one clicks on manual update it appears that the game does not recognize that there are any such aircraft in air groups.<br/>
<br/>
The production screen indicates the Mosquito PR16 doesn't even begin ...

<t> I have returned to the game after some time away and find that some air unit assignments have been changed. One example is the assignment of a gruppe of KG26 torpedo bombers to JagdKorp 2. It thus joins a floatplane group in a unit that AFAIK should be all fighters. What is the point of this ...

<t> On further study the problem appears to be occuring when you attempt to assign to a higher level HQ directive an air unit which is assigned to a lower level HQ. <br/>
<br/>
Thus, for example, assigning units of 2nd, 83rd or 84th Groups to a 2nd Tactical directive, or units of XII Tactical Air ...

<t> I have set up Turn 1 as the Allies in the 43-45 Campaign with Additional air HQs. I have 54 air directives and I am finding that when I run the turn several of the directives which I had selected specific squadrons or groups for have reverted back to auto assignment.<br/>
<br/>
Does anyone ...

<t> Ran a Malwarebytes scan on my computer today and came up with the following:<br/>
<br/>
Registry Keys Detected: 1<br/>
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\Gary Grigsby's War in the East1.00 (PUP.Optional.Surf)<br/>
<br/>
Files Detected: 1<br/>
C:\Windows\Gary Grigsby's ...

<t> I'd like to add a bit more to this story beyond what zuluhour has laid out. In our "daBabes" game IJN surface forces have underperformed from the outset. In July 42 a task force built around a 21 knot Royal Sovereign class battleship intercepted and disabled Zuikaku, in daylight no less, leaving ...

I saw this too a few turns ago in my Babes game with zuluhour. A 52 plane US fighter sweep came in in numerous packets, some as small as 4 planes. I've never seen this before.

Thanks for fixing this. It was annoying, but a minor glitch in the context of all the fantastic work you've done on this game.

Thanks for everything!

Are there any issues with playing the various standard map Babes scenarios, with stacking limits, in conjunction with the latest unofficial public beta fom michaelm?