Anyone up for a game?

I am happy to be either side. Usual house rules. Email g00dd0ggy@hotmail.com

I am up for a game.

If you are interested, email me - g00dd0ggy@hotmail.com

I have played maybe 10 times now, most as German. Haven't lost one yet, though came close last time.

<t>Another query about 3.3.<br/>
<br/>
It is Dec 14th. I am Axis. Axis losses are about 10,000 squads, Soviet are 60,000 odd.<br/>
<br/>
When I look at the resource pools, I have nearly 12,000 infantry squads sitting there (c 600,000 men).<br/>
<br/>
I can't remember exactly what I would have ...

<t>Just palying a '41 campaign v 3.3 and I was curious about the blizzard rules.<br/>
<br/>
I am Axis, and I've had blizzard turns on 16th Nov and 30th Nov. I've played the game many times, and never seen a blizzard before December. Have the new versions changed the weather rules, or has there ...

Anyone fancy a new game? I am easy about sides, but would prefer Axis, as I think I have palyed Russian the last 5 times...house rules apply.

I'm interested.

Don't care what side. What house rules do you want?

Email me at g00dd0ggy@hotmail.com

Regards,

<t>Can I suggest attrition as a strategy? The only way the Germans can win '43 is if it becomes a mobile war. The only way this can be achieved is by luring the Soviets into committing to the offensive in a manner that opens them up for counterattack (i.e. where the Soviet armour is committed to the ...

<t>The big problem I always had with multiple interdiction was not necessarily the damage caused by the strikes, but the fact that the attacker could repeatedly force the defender's CAP into action, thereby pretty much annihilating it in very short order.<br/>
<br/>
If you had 4 good fighter ...

I am interested. I have played about 5 pbem games in all, so not sure where that places me on your scale!

Not bothered which side i play really.

Email is g00dd0ggy@hotmail.com

<r>You clearly have not read my thread on Soviet strategy <E>:)</E> <br/>
<br/>
Hedgehog doesn't work - nothing does until you reach defensible lines.<br/>
<br/>
These are Leningrad - Novgorod - Demyansk - Vyazma - Rzevh - Orel<br/>
<br/>
Any further west is a waste of men and equipment. Defend in ...

<t>Thegame is tough on the Soviet player, which is why I made the post really.<br/>
<br/>
My main point was it is not possible to make a stand until Leningrad / Moscow. If you try and defend further west it is a wipe out, and you will NOT slow the German advance - that advance is dictated by rail ...

<t>In an idle moment, I thought I might post my musings on Soviet strategy and canvass some opinions on it.<br/>
<br/>
My own feeling is that the ONLY limit on the advance of a decent Axis player at the beginning of the game is rail conversion. Sadly almost any attempt to hold up the advance is ...

Boba,

Can you resend the last turn? I'm back from hols, but hotmail has wiped my account - including your email address.
Cheers

I had a read of this and though the Axis were in serious trouble. 42,000 squads is not too bad......

<t>There's no point going in the snow. The snow turns are really like the heavy frost that occurred historically - the Germans used it to continue their attacks to the gates of Moscow. The Germans aren't at a real disadvantage in the snow - they can keep attacking with alot of success. The Soviets ...

Hi all,

I'm looking for a PBEM opponent - not too picky about which version or which side.

Anyone interested, fire me an email to g00dd0ggy@hotmail.com

Cheers

<t>I suppose you just need to sort your house rules out first. <br/>
<br/>
i never use Hq mules, but in one game where I knew the opponent was using HQ mules, multiple interdictions from 1 hq and various other abuses (as I see it) I had to - otherwise my readiness never got over 40 odd %. It left a ...

<t>As you may know, Schwerpunkt games recently published this title and I wanted to know if anyone else on this board has it.<br/>
<br/>
It is a div/bde level Eastern Front sim, cery much hard core board wargame converted to computer, but it is fun - it reminds me alot of Fire in the East by GDW.<br ...

<t>I understand the point, but I think that it misses the very real problem created. <br/>
<br/>
I say it is fine to use different air groups for different missions (eg use some for anti airfield, some to AT, some to interdict etc.) but the problem arises when you use multiple groups to interdict ...

I'm up for it Magnus...though you may want a new opponent.